Literature DB >> 25207093

Abdominal wall endometrioma: ultrasonographic features and correlation with clinical findings.

Aynur Solak1, Berhan Genç1, Seyhan Yalaz2, Neslin Sahin1, Taylan Özgür Sezer3, Ilhami Solak3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of abdominal wall endometrioma (AWE) is often confused with other surgical conditions. Certain factors relating to knowledge of the clinical history of the disease make correct diagnosis and treatment difficult. AIMS: To present the clinical findings and ultrasonographic (US) features of AWE with special emphasis on size-related features. STUDY
DESIGN: This study reviewed abdominal wall endometriomas during a 2-year period in the Radiology Department of Sifa University Hospital, Izmir.
METHODS: Eleven women (mean age 32.6 years) with 12 scar endometriomas (mean diameter 29.2 mm) were consecutively evaluated by US and Colour Doppler examination (CDUS) prior to surgery. Lesions were grouped into large (≥3 cm) and small nodules. Vascularisation was classified as location (central, peripheral and mixed) and severity (absent, moderately vascular and hypervascular). In each patient, the nature of pain (absent, cyclic: associated with menstruation and continuous), historical and clinical data were documented. Four patients underwent Magnetic Resonance Imaging and their findings were presented. Fisher's exact test, χ(2) test for categorical data and the unpaired T-test for continuous variables were used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: In all the women, US of the AWE showed the presence of a solid hypoechoic mass (less echogenic than the surrounding hyperechoic fat) within the abdominal wall. There was a significant correlation between AWE sizes with repeated caesareans and the mean time between the last operation and admission to hospital (p<0.05). Large endometriomas showed increased central vascularity (p<0.05). Cyclic pain was more frequent in small lesions, whereas continuous pain was more commonly found in patients with larger lesions (p<0.05).
CONCLUSION: AWE is often misdiagnosed clinically because endometriosis may occur years after the caesarean section, the pain is often non-cyclic in nature, and there is not always a palpable tender mass. The sonographic and Doppler findings, along with proper correlation with clinical data, may substantially contribute to the correct diagnosis of endometrioma.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abdominal wall endometriosis; cyclic pain; ultrasonography

Year:  2013        PMID: 25207093      PMCID: PMC4115979          DOI: 10.5152/balkanmedj.2012.102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Balkan Med J        ISSN: 2146-3123            Impact factor:   2.021


  24 in total

1.  Subcutaneous abdominal wall masses: radiological reasoning.

Authors:  Lauren Stein; Khaled M Elsayes; Nicolaus Wagner-Bartak
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Three-dimensional sonographic diagnosis of abdominal wall endometriosis: a useful tool?

Authors:  Anne Picard; Marie-Noelle Varlet; Francois Guillibert; Micha Srour; Alix Clemenson; Abir Khaddage; Pierre Seffert; Gautier Chene
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2010-06-20       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Reliable clinical and sonographic findings in the diagnosis of abdominal wall endometriosis near cesarean section scar.

Authors:  Giampiero Francica
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2012-04-28

4.  Sonographic depiction of intratumoral vascularity with 2- and 3-dimensional color Doppler techniques.

Authors:  Arthur C Fleischer; Michael R Milam; Marta A Crispens; Heidi W Shappell
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  Abdominal wall endometriosis in the cesarean section surgical scar: a potential diagnostic pitfall.

Authors:  Leyla Ozel; Julide Sagiroglu; Aysun Unal; Ethem Unal; Pembegul Gunes; Erdem Baskent; Nurettin Aka; M Izzet Titiz; E Can Tufekci
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 1.730

6.  Endometriosis following cesarean section: ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Anja Randriamarolahy; Hubert Perrin; Jean Michel Cucchi; Françoise Fuerxer; Philippe Brunner; Jean Noël Bruneton
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.605

7.  Incidence of endometriosis by study population and diagnostic method: the ENDO study.

Authors:  Germaine M Buck Louis; Mary L Hediger; C Matthew Peterson; Mary Croughan; Rajeshwari Sundaram; Joseph Stanford; Zhen Chen; Victor Y Fujimoto; Michael W Varner; Ann Trumble; Linda C Giudice
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Endometriosis on laparotomy scar. A three-case report.

Authors:  L Roncoroni; R Costi; V Violi; R Nunziata
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.344

9.  Clear cell adenocarcinoma arising from abdominal wall endometriosis mimicking urachal tumor.

Authors:  Harutake Sawazaki; Hirofumi Goto; Noriyasu Takao; Yoji Taki; Hideo Takeuchi
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Abdominal wall endometriomas.

Authors:  Ray G Blanco; Vellore S Parithivel; Ajay K Shah; Milton A Gumbs; Moshe Schein; Paul H Gerst
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  4 in total

1.  A Rare Cause of Abdominal Pain: Scar Endometriosis.

Authors:  Banu Karapolat; Hatice Kucuk
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 1.112

2.  Resection and Abdominal Wall Reconstruction for Cesarean Scar Endometriosis.

Authors:  Kento Takaya; Hirokazu Shido; Shun Yamazaki
Journal:  Case Rep Med       Date:  2022-04-29

3.  Abdominal wall mass suspected of endometriosis: clinical and pathologic features.

Authors:  HeeKyoung Song; SangHee Lee; Min Jeong Kim; Jae Eun Shin; Dae Woo Lee; Hae Nam Lee
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2020-03-19

4.  Parietal Mass: Two Case Reports of Rare Cesarean Scar Endometriosis.

Authors:  Abdelbassir Ramdani; Kaoutar Rais; Obed Rockson; Badr Serji; Tijani El Harroudi
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-02-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.