| Literature DB >> 25206417 |
Sheng Wang1, Rong Zeng2, Limin Lei2, Jinsong Huang2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between angiotensinogen gene M235T polymorphism and ischemic stroke in East Asians. DATA RETRIEVAL: A computer-based online search was conducted in PubMed, Google scholar, China National Knowledge lnfrastructure database between January 1990 and April 2012 for relevant studies. The key words were angiotensinogen or AGT, polymorphism or genetic and ischemic stroke or cerebral infarction. SELECTION CRITERIA: Case-controlled studies addressing the correlation between angiotensinogen gene M235T polymorphism and ischemic stroke in East Asians were included. The distribution of genotypes in the included studies was tested for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Quality evaluation of the included studies was conducted by two physicians. Statistical analyses were carried out using Stata 12.0 software for meta-analysis. Heterogeneity tests, sensitivity analysis and publication bias were also conducted. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The association between angiotensinogen gene M235T polymorphism and ischemic stroke risk in East Asians was assessed.Entities:
Keywords: East Asians; angiotensinogen; brain injury; cerebral infarction; cerebrovascular disease; genetic polymorphism; grants-supported paper; ischemic stroke; meta-analysis; neural regeneration; neuroregeneration; risk factor
Year: 2013 PMID: 25206417 PMCID: PMC4107611 DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5374.2013.13.008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neural Regen Res ISSN: 1673-5374 Impact factor: 5.135
Figure 1Flow diagram of study searching and selection process.
Characteristics of the included studies for meta-analysis
Summary odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of the included studies for meta-analysis
Figure 2Association of M235T polymorphism with the risk for ischemic stroke in East Asians (T vs. M).
Figure 6Association of M235T polymorphism with the risk for ischemic stroke in East Asians (recessive model: TT + MT vs. MM).
Figure 7Begg's funnel plot of the comparison of T vs. M to determine publication bias.
The results showed that there was no publication bias.