Literature DB >> 25206285

Clinical presentations of gastric small gastrointestinal stromal tumors mimics functional dyspepsia symptoms.

Qing-Xiang Yu1, Zhan-Kun He1, Jiang Wang1, Chao Sun1, Wei Zhao1, Bang-Mao Wang1.   

Abstract

AIM: To explore whether clinical presentations of gastric small gastrointestinal tumors (GISTs) mimics gastrointestinal dyspepsia symptoms.
METHODS: The endosonographic data of 167 patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection at the Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, China between 2009 and 2011 were analyzed. GISTs and leiomyomas had a similar intragastric distribution and similar locations within the gastric wall. Therefore, patients with GISTs were chosen as the study group and those with leiomyomas were chosen as the control group. Dyspepsia symptom questionnaires were used to investigate and compare the gastrointestinal symptoms of patients with GISTs and those with gastric leiomyomas before and after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). The questionnaires evaluated symptoms such as epigastric pain, heartburn, regurgitation, epigastric discomfort, nausea and vomiting, abdominal bloating, and eructation. Symptoms were assessed using a four-point scoring scale.
RESULTS: GISTs were the most common gastric submucosal lesion (67 cases, 40.12%), followed by leiomyomas (38 cases, 22.75%). Both groups were similar in terms of gender distribution (P = 0.49), intragastric location (P = 0.525), and originating layer within the gastric wall (P = 0.449), but leiomyomas were more commonly found in the proximal fundus (P < 0.05). Overall, 94.2% of the patients with small GISTs and 93.5% of those with gastric leiomyomas experienced some dyspepsia; however, total symptom scores were significantly lower in the GIST group than in the leiomyoma group (1.34 ± 1.27 vs 2.20 ± 1.70, P < 0.05). Each component of the symptom score demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in the GIST patients after ESD (P < 0.05), including epigastric pain (0.80 ± 0.90 vs 0.13 ± 0.46), heartburn (0.63 ± 1.08 vs 0.13 ± 0.41), regurgitation (0.55 ± 0.87 vs 0.22 ± 0.57), epigastric discomfort (0.70 ± 0.98 vs 0.32 ± 0.47), nausea and vomiting (0.27 ± 0.62 vs 0.05 ± 0.21), abdominal bloating (0.70 ± 0.90 vs 0.27 ± 0.49), and eructation (0.36 ± 0.61 vs 0.21 ± 0.46). For leiomyoma patients, symptoms such as heartburn, nausea, vomiting, and eructation improved after treatment; however, these improvements were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Thus, the pathophysiology of dyspepsia symptoms may be different between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: Symptoms of gastric small GISTs may mimic those of functional dyspepsia. An alternative diagnosis should be considered in patients with functional dyspepsia and treatment failure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical presentation; Endoscopic ultrasonography; Gastric leiomyoma; Gastric small gastrointestinal stromal tumor

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25206285      PMCID: PMC4155371          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i33.11800

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  37 in total

1.  Gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach: a clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic study of 1765 cases with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Markku Miettinen; Leslie H Sobin; Jerzy Lasota
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 2.  Gastrointestinal stromal tumors--definition, clinical, histological, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic features and differential diagnosis.

Authors:  M Miettinen; J Lasota
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  Endoscopic ultrasonography for gastric submucosal lesions.

Authors:  Ioannis S Papanikolaou; Konstantinos Triantafyllou; Anastasia Kourikou; Thomas Rösch
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-05-16

4.  PKC theta, a novel immunohistochemical marker for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), especially useful for identifying KIT-negative tumors.

Authors:  Atsushi Motegi; Shinji Sakurai; Hiroko Nakayama; Takaaki Sano; Tetsunari Oyama; Takashi Nakajima
Journal:  Pathol Int       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.534

Review 5.  Diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A consensus approach.

Authors:  Christopher D M Fletcher; Jules J Berman; Christopher Corless; Fred Gorstein; Jerzy Lasota; B Jack Longley; Markku Miettinen; Timothy J O'Leary; Helen Remotti; Brian P Rubin; Barry Shmookler; Leslie H Sobin; Sharon W Weiss
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.466

6.  Ano1 is a selective marker of interstitial cells of Cajal in the human and mouse gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  Pedro J Gomez-Pinilla; Simon J Gibbons; Michael R Bardsley; Andrea Lorincz; Maria J Pozo; Pankaj J Pasricha; Matt Van de Rijn; Robert B West; Michael G Sarr; Michael L Kendrick; Robert R Cima; Eric J Dozois; David W Larson; Tamas Ordog; Gianrico Farrugia
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 4.052

7.  Risk stratification of patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal stromal tumor.

Authors:  Heikki Joensuu
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.466

8.  Patterns of nestin and other intermediate filament expression distinguish between gastrointestinal stromal tumors, leiomyomas and schwannomas.

Authors:  Maarit Sarlomo-Rikala; Tohru Tsujimura; Urban Lendahl; Markku Miettinen
Journal:  APMIS       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.205

9.  Small bowel Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors can physiologically alter gut motility before causing mechanical obstruction.

Authors:  Manish S Kothari; Vasilis Kosmoliaptsis; John Meyrick-Thomas
Journal:  Int Semin Surg Oncol       Date:  2005-10-26

10.  Ultrastructural studies of gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Authors:  Sung-Hye Park; Min-Kyung Kim; Hanseong Kim; Byung Joo Song; Je G Chi
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.153

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Clinical Presentation of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.

Authors:  Franka Menge; Jens Jakob; Bernd Kasper; Armand Smakic; Timo Gaiser; Peter Hohenberger
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2018-10-13

2.  Efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection for small submucosal tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer in the gastric fundus.

Authors:  Bing Li; Tao Chen; Zhi-Peng Qi; Li-Qing Yao; Mei-Dong Xu; Qiang Shi; Shi-Lun Cai; Di Sun; Ping-Hong Zhou; Yun-Shi Zhong
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Clinical Control Study of Endoscopic Full-thickness Resection and Laparoscopic Surgery in the Treatment of Gastric Tumors Arising from the Muscularis Propria.

Authors:  Cheng-Rong Wu; Liu-Ye Huang; Juan Guo; Bo Zhang; Jun Cui; Cheng-Ming Sun; Li-Xin Jiang; Zhi-Hua Wang; Ai-Hong Ju
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 2.628

4.  Small Bowel Stromal Tumors: Different Clinicopathologic and Computed Tomography Features in Various Anatomic Sites.

Authors:  Gu-sheng Xing; Shuang Wang; Yue-Min Sun; Zheng Yuan; Xin-Ming Zhao; Chun-wu Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.