Literature DB >> 25205590

A review of global potentially available cropland estimates and their consequences for model-based assessments.

David A Eitelberg1, Jasper van Vliet, Peter H Verburg.   

Abstract

The world's population is growing and demand for food, feed, fiber, and fuel is increasing, placing greater demand on land and its resources for crop production. We review previously published estimates of global scale cropland availability, discuss the underlying assumptions that lead to differences between estimates, and illustrate the consequences of applying different estimates in model-based assessments of land-use change. The review estimates a range from 1552 to 5131 Mha, which includes 1550 Mha that is already cropland. Hence, the lowest estimates indicate that there is almost no room for cropland expansion, while the highest estimates indicate that cropland could potentially expand to over three times its current area. Differences can largely be attributed to institutional assumptions, i.e. which land covers/uses (e.g. forests or grasslands) are societally or governmentally allowed to convert to cropland, while there was little variation in biophysical assumptions. Estimates based on comparable assumptions showed a variation of up to 84%, which originated mainly from different underlying data sources. On the basis of this synthesis of the assumptions underlying these estimates, we constructed a high, a medium, and a low estimate of cropland availability that are representative of the range of estimates in the reviewed studies. We apply these estimates in a land-change model to illustrate the consequences on cropland expansion and intensification as well as deforestation. While uncertainty in cropland availability is hardly addressed in global land-use change assessments, the results indicate a large range of estimates with important consequences for model-based assessments.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  agricultural intensification; cropland expansion; land availability; land reserve; land use; land-change model

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25205590     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12733

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  10 in total

1.  Representing responses to climate change in spatial land system models.

Authors:  Žiga Malek; Peter H Verburg
Journal:  Land Degrad Dev       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 4.377

2.  Demarcation of Prime Farmland Protection Areas around a Metropolis Based on High-Resolution Satellite Imagery.

Authors:  Nan Xia; YaJun Wang; Hao Xu; YueFan Sun; Yi Yuan; Liang Cheng; PengHui Jiang; ManChun Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Global projections of future cropland expansion to 2050 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon storage.

Authors:  Amy Molotoks; Elke Stehfest; Jonathan Doelman; Fabrizio Albanito; Nuala Fitton; Terence P Dawson; Pete Smith
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 10.863

4.  Mapping global development potential for renewable energy, fossil fuels, mining and agriculture sectors.

Authors:  James R Oakleaf; Christina M Kennedy; Sharon Baruch-Mordo; James S Gerber; Paul C West; Justin A Johnson; Joseph Kiesecker
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 6.444

5.  Comparing the impact of future cropland expansion on global biodiversity and carbon storage across models and scenarios.

Authors:  Amy Molotoks; Roslyn Henry; Elke Stehfest; Jonathan Doelman; Petr Havlik; Tamás Krisztin; Peter Alexander; Terence P Dawson; Pete Smith
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Identifying Agricultural Frontiers for Modeling Global Cropland Expansion.

Authors:  Felix Eigenbrod; Michael Beckmann; Sebastian Dunnett; Laura Graham; Robert A Holland; Patrick Meyfroidt; Ralf Seppelt; Xiao-Peng Song; Rebecca Spake; Tomáš Václavík; Peter H Verburg
Journal:  One Earth       Date:  2020-10-23

7.  Global inventory of suitable, cultivable and available cropland under different scenarios and policies.

Authors:  Julia M Schneider; Florian Zabel; Wolfram Mauser
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2022-08-27       Impact factor: 8.501

8.  Simulation of winter wheat response to variable sowing dates and densities in a high-yielding environment.

Authors:  Sibylle Dueri; Hamish Brown; Senthold Asseng; Frank Ewert; Heidi Webber; Mike George; Rob Craigie; Jose Rafael Guarin; Diego N L Pequeno; Tommaso Stella; Mukhtar Ahmed; Phillip D Alderman; Bruno Basso; Andres G Berger; Gennady Bracho Mujica; Davide Cammarano; Yi Chen; Benjamin Dumont; Ehsan Eyshi Rezaei; Elias Fereres; Roberto Ferrise; Thomas Gaiser; Yujing Gao; Margarita Garcia-Vila; Sebastian Gayler; Zvi Hochman; Gerrit Hoogenboom; Kurt C Kersebaum; Claas Nendel; Jørgen E Olesen; Gloria Padovan; Taru Palosuo; Eckart Priesack; Johannes W M Pullens; Alfredo Rodríguez; Reimund P Rötter; Margarita Ruiz Ramos; Mikhail A Semenov; Nimai Senapati; Stefan Siebert; Amit Kumar Srivastava; Claudio Stöckle; Iwan Supit; Fulu Tao; Peter Thorburn; Enli Wang; Tobias Karl David Weber; Liujun Xiao; Chuang Zhao; Jin Zhao; Zhigan Zhao; Yan Zhu; Pierre Martre
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 7.298

9.  A spatially explicit representation of conservation agriculture for application in global change studies.

Authors:  Reinhard Prestele; Annette L Hirsch; Edouard L Davin; Sonia I Seneviratne; Peter H Verburg
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2018-06-03       Impact factor: 10.863

10.  Predicted wind and solar energy expansion has minimal overlap with multiple conservation priorities across global regions.

Authors:  Sebastian Dunnett; Robert A Holland; Gail Taylor; Felix Eigenbrod
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 12.779

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.