Literature DB >> 25205360

Assessing the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 5. Improved docking performance using high solute dielectric constant MM/GBSA and MM/PBSA rescoring.

Huiyong Sun1, Youyong Li, Mingyun Shen, Sheng Tian, Lei Xu, Peichen Pan, Yan Guan, Tingjun Hou.   

Abstract

With the rapid development of computational techniques and hardware, more rigorous and precise theoretical models have been used to predict the binding affinities of a large number of small molecules to biomolecules. By employing continuum solvation models, the MM/GBSA and MM/PBSA methodologies achieve a good balance between low computational cost and reasonable prediction accuracy. In this study, we have thoroughly investigated the effects of interior dielectric constant, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, and the number of top-scored docking poses on the performance of the MM/GBSA and MM/PBSA rescoring of docking poses for three tyrosine kinases, including ABL, ALK, and BRAF. Overall, the MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA rescoring achieved comparative accuracies based on a relatively higher solute (or interior) dielectric constant (i.e. ε = 2, or 4), and could markedly improve the 'screening power' and 'ranking power' given by Autodock. Moreover, with a relatively higher solute dielectric constant, the MM/PBSA or MM/GBSA rescoring based on the best scored docking poses and the multiple top-scored docking poses gave similar predictions, implying that much computational cost can be saved by considering the best scored docking poses only. Besides, compared with the rescoring based on the minimized structures, the rescoring based on the MD simulations might not be completely necessary due to its negligible impact on the docking performance. Considering the much higher computational demand of MM/PBSA, MM/GBSA with a high solute dielectric constant (ε = 2 or 4) is recommended for the virtual screening of tyrosine kinases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25205360     DOI: 10.1039/c4cp03179b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys        ISSN: 1463-9076            Impact factor:   3.676


  92 in total

1.  In-silico modeling studies of G-quadruplex with soy isoflavones having anticancerous activity.

Authors:  Jyoti Singh Tomar
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2015-07-12       Impact factor: 1.810

2.  Effect of mutations on binding of ligands to guanine riboswitch probed by free energy perturbation and molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Jianzhong Chen; Xingyu Wang; Laixue Pang; John Z H Zhang; Tong Zhu
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Structural insight into the serotonin (5-HT) receptor family by molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulation and systems pharmacology analysis.

Authors:  Yuan-Qiang Wang; Wei-Wei Lin; Nan Wu; Si-Yi Wang; Mao-Zi Chen; Zhi-Hua Lin; Xiang-Qun Xie; Zhi-Wei Feng
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 6.150

4.  Evaluating the performance of MM/PBSA for binding affinity prediction using class A GPCR crystal structures.

Authors:  Mei Qian Yau; Abigail L Emtage; Nathaniel J Y Chan; Stephen W Doughty; Jason S E Loo
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Exploring the stability of ligand binding modes to proteins by molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Kai Liu; Etsurou Watanabe; Hironori Kokubo
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Computational identification of novel entry inhibitor scaffolds mimicking primary receptor CD4 of HIV-1 gp120.

Authors:  Alexander M Andrianov; Ivan A Kashyn; Alexander V Tuzikov
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 1.810

7.  Molecular modeling study, synthesis and biological evaluation of combretastatin A-4 analogues as anticancer agents and tubulin inhibitors.

Authors:  Yang Ping Quan; Li Ping Cheng; Tian Chi Wang; Wan Pang; Fan Hong Wu; Jin Wen Huang
Journal:  Medchemcomm       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 3.597

8.  Assessing the performance of docking scoring function, FEP, MM-GBSA, and QM/MM-GBSA approaches on a series of PLK1 inhibitors.

Authors:  Chunlan Pu; Guoyi Yan; Jianyou Shi; Rui Li
Journal:  Medchemcomm       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 3.597

9.  Comparison of affinity ranking using AutoDock-GPU and MM-GBSA scores for BACE-1 inhibitors in the D3R Grand Challenge 4.

Authors:  Léa El Khoury; Diogo Santos-Martins; Sukanya Sasmal; Jérôme Eberhardt; Giulia Bianco; Francesca Alessandra Ambrosio; Leonardo Solis-Vasquez; Andreas Koch; Stefano Forli; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 3.686

10.  Aromatic interactions at the ligand-protein interface: Implications for the development of docking scoring functions.

Authors:  Michal Brylinski
Journal:  Chem Biol Drug Des       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 2.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.