BACKGROUND: There is increasing interest on whether the current global economic uncertainties have an influence on the population's mental health. In this paper, we examined the association of negative socioeconomic changes, job loss and household income reductions with incident mental disorders. The moderating effect of gender was assessed. METHODS: Data come from the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study-2 (NEMESIS-2), a representative population-based, longitudinal study. Individuals with a paid job and without a 12-month mental disorder at baseline were selected and reassessed 3 years later (2007-2009/2010-2012). Substantial household income reductions and not being at a paid job anymore were self-reported at follow-up. Multivariate logistic models were utilised to investigate the association between these negative socioeconomic changes and the incidence of mood, anxiety and substance use Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-IV disorders assessed by the Composite International Diagnostic Interview 3.0. RESULTS: After 3 years, 6% had lost their job, 11% had a substantial household income reduction and 12.2% had developed a mental disorder. Household income reductions increased the risk of any mental disorder (aOR=1.77), particularly the risk of mood (aOR=2.24). Job loss increased the risk of mood disorders (aOR=2.02). Gender modified the relationship: job loss increased the risk of any mental disorder among men (aOR=3.04) and household income reductions did so among women (aOR=2.32). CONCLUSIONS: Negative socioeconomic changes occurring within a short time period significantly increased the risk of incident mental disorders, particularly of mood disorders. Effective interventions to alleviate the public mental health impact of negative socioeconomic changes on men and women are needed. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
BACKGROUND: There is increasing interest on whether the current global economic uncertainties have an influence on the population's mental health. In this paper, we examined the association of negative socioeconomic changes, job loss and household income reductions with incident mental disorders. The moderating effect of gender was assessed. METHODS: Data come from the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study-2 (NEMESIS-2), a representative population-based, longitudinal study. Individuals with a paid job and without a 12-month mental disorder at baseline were selected and reassessed 3 years later (2007-2009/2010-2012). Substantial household income reductions and not being at a paid job anymore were self-reported at follow-up. Multivariate logistic models were utilised to investigate the association between these negative socioeconomic changes and the incidence of mood, anxiety and substance use Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-IV disorders assessed by the Composite International Diagnostic Interview 3.0. RESULTS: After 3 years, 6% had lost their job, 11% had a substantial household income reduction and 12.2% had developed a mental disorder. Household income reductions increased the risk of any mental disorder (aOR=1.77), particularly the risk of mood (aOR=2.24). Job loss increased the risk of mood disorders (aOR=2.02). Gender modified the relationship: job loss increased the risk of any mental disorder among men (aOR=3.04) and household income reductions did so among women (aOR=2.32). CONCLUSIONS: Negative socioeconomic changes occurring within a short time period significantly increased the risk of incident mental disorders, particularly of mood disorders. Effective interventions to alleviate the public mental health impact of negative socioeconomic changes on men and women are needed. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Entities:
Keywords:
MENTAL HEALTH; SOCIAL EPIDEMIOLOGY; SOCIO-ECONOMIC
Authors: Siu-Ming Chan; Linda Chiu-Wa Lam; Wing-Yan Law; Se-Fong Hung; Wai-Chi Chan; Eric Yu-Hai Chen; Gary Ka-Ki Chung; Yat-Hang Chan; Roger Yat-Nork Chung; Hung Wong; Eng-Kiong Yeoh; Jean Woo Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-06-09 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Kimmo Suokas; Anna-Maija Koivisto; Christian Hakulinen; Riittakerttu Kaltiala; Reijo Sund; Sonja Lumme; Olli Kampman; Sami Pirkola Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2020-03-01 Impact factor: 25.911
Authors: Juan Antonio Córdoba-Doña; Antonio Escolar-Pujolar; Miguel San Sebastián; Per E Gustafsson Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2016-03-15 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Fernando C Barros; Alicia Matijasevich; Iná S Santos; Bernardo L Horta; Bruna Gonçalves C da Silva; Tiago N Munhoz; Seena Fazel; Alan Stein; Rebecca M Pearson; Luciana Anselmi; Luis Augusto Rohde Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2018-05-02 Impact factor: 4.328