Angela Curl1, Ade Kearns1, Phil Mason1, Matthew Egan2, Carol Tannahill3, Anne Ellaway4. 1. Urban Studies, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK. 2. Department of Social and Environmental Health Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. 3. Glasgow Centre for Population Health, Glasgow, UK. 4. MRC Social & Public Health Sciences Unit, Glasgow, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Existing research points towards physical and mental health gains from housing improvements, but findings are inconsistent and often not statistically significant. The detailed characteristics and variability of housing improvement works are problematic and studies are often small, not experimental, with short follow-up times. METHODS: A quasi-experimental design was used to assess the impact on physical health and mental health (using SF-12v2 Physical and Mental health component summary scales) of four types of housing improvement works-central heating, 'Secured By Design' front doors, fabric works, kitchens and bathrooms-both singly and in pairwise combinations. A longitudinal sample of 1933 residents from 15 deprived communities in Glasgow, UK was constructed from surveys carried out in 2006, 2008 and 2011. Sociodemographic characteristics and changes in employment status were taken into account. RESULTS: Fabric works had positive associations with physical health (+2.09, 95% CI 0.13 to 4.04) and mental health (+1.84, 95% CI 0.04 to 3.65) in 1-2 years. Kitchens and bathrooms had a positive association with mental health in 1-2 years (+2.58, 95% CI 0.79 to 4.36). Central heating had a negative association with physical health (-2.21, 95% CI -3.74 to -0.68). New front doors had a positive association with mental health in <1 year (+5.89, 95% CI 0.65 to 11.14) and when provided alongside kitchens and bathrooms (+4.25, 95% CI 1.71 to 6.80). Gaining employment had strong associations with physical health (+7.14, 95% CI 4.72 to 9.55) as well as mental health (+5.50, 95% CI 3.27 to 7.73). CONCLUSIONS: Fabric works may provide insulation benefits and visual amenity benefits to residents. Front doors may provide important security benefits in deprived communities. Economic regeneration is important alongside property-led regeneration. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
BACKGROUND: Existing research points towards physical and mental health gains from housing improvements, but findings are inconsistent and often not statistically significant. The detailed characteristics and variability of housing improvement works are problematic and studies are often small, not experimental, with short follow-up times. METHODS: A quasi-experimental design was used to assess the impact on physical health and mental health (using SF-12v2 Physical and Mental health component summary scales) of four types of housing improvement works-central heating, 'Secured By Design' front doors, fabric works, kitchens and bathrooms-both singly and in pairwise combinations. A longitudinal sample of 1933 residents from 15 deprived communities in Glasgow, UK was constructed from surveys carried out in 2006, 2008 and 2011. Sociodemographic characteristics and changes in employment status were taken into account. RESULTS: Fabric works had positive associations with physical health (+2.09, 95% CI 0.13 to 4.04) and mental health (+1.84, 95% CI 0.04 to 3.65) in 1-2 years. Kitchens and bathrooms had a positive association with mental health in 1-2 years (+2.58, 95% CI 0.79 to 4.36). Central heating had a negative association with physical health (-2.21, 95% CI -3.74 to -0.68). New front doors had a positive association with mental health in <1 year (+5.89, 95% CI 0.65 to 11.14) and when provided alongside kitchens and bathrooms (+4.25, 95% CI 1.71 to 6.80). Gaining employment had strong associations with physical health (+7.14, 95% CI 4.72 to 9.55) as well as mental health (+5.50, 95% CI 3.27 to 7.73). CONCLUSIONS: Fabric works may provide insulation benefits and visual amenity benefits to residents. Front doors may provide important security benefits in deprived communities. Economic regeneration is important alongside property-led regeneration. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Entities:
Keywords:
HEALTH STATUS; HOUSING; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; PUBLIC HEALTH; RECORD LINKAGE
Authors: Charlotte N B Grey; Shiyu Jiang; Christina Nascimento; Sarah E Rodgers; Rhodri Johnson; Ronan A Lyons; Wouter Poortinga Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2017-01-31 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Emma Baker; Andrew Beer; Laurence Lester; David Pevalin; Christine Whitehead; Rebecca Bentley Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2017-05-26 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Sarah E Rodgers; Rowena Bailey; Rhodri Johnson; Damon Berridge; Wouter Poortinga; Simon Lannon; Robert Smith; Ronan A Lyons Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2018-06-20 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Courtney J Wright; Jacinta Colley; Kate Knudsen; Elizabeth Kendall Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-08-07 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Janet Ige; Paul Pilkington; Judy Orme; Ben Williams; Emily Prestwood; D Black; Laurence Carmichael; Gabriel Scally Journal: J Public Health (Oxf) Date: 2019-06-01 Impact factor: 2.341
Authors: Louise Foley; Emma Coombes; Dan Hayman; David Humphreys; Andrew Jones; Richard Mitchell; David Ogilvie Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2018-04-24 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Richard A Sharpe; Tim Taylor; Lora E Fleming; Karyn Morrissey; George Morris; Rachel Wigglesworth Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-10-24 Impact factor: 3.390