Jamie A Davies1, Peter Hohenstein2, C-Hong Chang3, Rachel Berry4. 1. University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9XB, UK. jamie.davies@ed.ac.uk. 2. The Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, UK. Peter.Hohenstein@roslin.ed.ac.uk. 3. University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9XB, UK. C.Chang-19@sms.ed.ac.uk. 4. The Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK. rachel.berry@igmm.ed.ac.uk.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Glandular organs require the development of a correctly patterned epithelial tree. These arise by iterative branching: early branches have a stereotyped anatomy, while subsequent branching is more flexible, branches spacing out to avoid entanglement. Previous studies have suggested different genetic programs are responsible for these two classes of branches. RESULTS: Here, working with the urinary collecting duct tree of mouse kidneys, we show that the transition from the initial, stereotyped, wide branching to narrower later branching is independent from previous branching events but depends instead on the proximity of other branch tips. A simple computer model suggests that a repelling molecule secreted by branches can in principle generate a well-spaced tree that switches automatically from wide initial branch angles to narrower subsequent ones, and that co-cultured trees would distort their normal shapes rather than colliding. We confirm this collision-avoidance experimentally using organ cultures, and identify BMP7 as the repelling molecule. CONCLUSIONS: We propose that self-avoidance, an intrinsically error-correcting mechanism, may be an important patterning mechanism in collecting duct branching, operating along with already-known mesenchyme-derived paracrine factors.
BACKGROUND: Glandular organs require the development of a correctly patterned epithelial tree. These arise by iterative branching: early branches have a stereotyped anatomy, while subsequent branching is more flexible, branches spacing out to avoid entanglement. Previous studies have suggested different genetic programs are responsible for these two classes of branches. RESULTS: Here, working with the urinary collecting duct tree of mouse kidneys, we show that the transition from the initial, stereotyped, wide branching to narrower later branching is independent from previous branching events but depends instead on the proximity of other branch tips. A simple computer model suggests that a repelling molecule secreted by branches can in principle generate a well-spaced tree that switches automatically from wide initial branch angles to narrower subsequent ones, and that co-cultured trees would distort their normal shapes rather than colliding. We confirm this collision-avoidance experimentally using organ cultures, and identify BMP7 as the repelling molecule. CONCLUSIONS: We propose that self-avoidance, an intrinsically error-correcting mechanism, may be an important patterning mechanism in collecting duct branching, operating along with already-known mesenchyme-derived paracrine factors.
Authors: Victoria M Bedell; Sang-Yeob Yeo; Kye Won Park; Jeffrey Chung; Pankaj Seth; Venkatesha Shivalingappa; Jinhua Zhao; Tomoko Obara; Vikas P Sukhatme; Iain A Drummond; Dean Y Li; Ramani Ramchandran Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-04-22 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Sunny Hartwig; Darren Bridgewater; Valeria Di Giovanni; Jason Cain; Yuji Mishina; Norman D Rosenblum Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Simon D Harding; Chris Armit; Jane Armstrong; Jane Brennan; Ying Cheng; Bernard Haggarty; Derek Houghton; Sue Lloyd-MacGilp; Xingjun Pi; Yogmatee Roochun; Mehran Sharghi; Christopher Tindal; Andrew P McMahon; Brian Gottesman; Melissa H Little; Kylie Georgas; Bruce J Aronow; S Steven Potter; Eric W Brunskill; E Michelle Southard-Smith; Cathy Mendelsohn; Richard A Baldock; Jamie A Davies; Duncan Davidson Journal: Development Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 6.868
Authors: Elisabeth G Rens; Mathé T Zeegers; Iraes Rabbers; András Szabó; Roeland M H Merks Journal: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Date: 2020-07-27 Impact factor: 6.237
Authors: Edouard Hannezo; Colinda L G J Scheele; Mohammad Moad; Nicholas Drogo; Rakesh Heer; Rosemary V Sampogna; Jacco van Rheenen; Benjamin D Simons Journal: Cell Date: 2017-09-21 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Bryan A Nerger; Jacob M Jaslove; Hader E Elashal; Sheng Mao; Andrej Košmrlj; A James Link; Celeste M Nelson Journal: Curr Biol Date: 2021-03-10 Impact factor: 10.834
Authors: Ben Lambert; Adam L MacLean; Alexander G Fletcher; Alexander N Combes; Melissa H Little; Helen M Byrne Journal: J Math Biol Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 2.259