Literature DB >> 25204619

Molecular determinants of the recognition of ulipristal acetate by oxo-steroid receptors.

I Petit-Topin1, M Fay1, M Resche-Rigon2, A Ulmann2, E Gainer2, M-E Rafestin-Oblin1, J Fagart3.   

Abstract

The human progesterone receptor (PR) plays a key role in reproductive function in women. PR antagonists have numerous applications in female health care including regular and emergency contraception, and treatment of hormone-related pathological conditions such as breast cancer, endometriosis, and leiomyoma. The main factor limiting their long-term administration is the fact that they cross-bind to other oxo-steroid receptors. Ulipristal acetate (UPA), a highly potent PR antagonist, has recently come onto the market and is much more selective for PR than the other oxo-steroid receptors (androgen, AR, glucocorticoid, GR, and mineralocorticoid, MR receptors) and, remarkably, it displays lower GR-inactivating potency than RU486. We adopted a structural approach to characterizing the binding of UPA to the oxo-steroid receptors at the molecular level. We solved the X-ray crystal structure of the ligand-binding domain (LBD) of the human PR complexed with UPA and a peptide from the transcriptional corepressor SMRT. We used the X-ray crystal structure of the GR in its antagonist conformation to dock UPA within its ligand-binding cavity. Finally, we generated three-dimensional models of the LBD of androgen and mineralocorticoid receptors (AR and MR) in an antagonist conformation and docked UPA within them. Comparing the structures revealed that the network of stabilizing contacts between the UPA C11 aryl group and the LBD is responsible for its high PR antagonist potency. It also showed that it is the inability of UPA to contact Gln642 in GR that explains why it has lower potency in inactivating GR than RU486. Finally, we found that the binding pockets of AR and MR are too small to accommodate UPA, and allowed us to propose that the extremely low sensitivity of MR to UPA is due to inappropriate interactions with the C11 substituent. All these findings open new avenues for designing new PR antagonist compounds displaying greater selectivity.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antagonist; Crystal; Nuclear receptor; Progesterone receptor; Reproduction; Selectivity; Steroids; structure

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25204619     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2014.08.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol        ISSN: 0960-0760            Impact factor:   4.292


  11 in total

1.  Nestorone® as a Novel Progestin for Nonoral Contraception: Structure-Activity Relationships and Brain Metabolism Studies.

Authors:  Narender Kumar; Jerôme Fagart; Philippe Liere; Scott J Mitchell; Alanah R Knibb; Isabelle Petit-Topin; Marion Rame; Martine El-Etr; Michael Schumacher; Jeremy J Lambert; Marie-Edith Rafestin-Oblin; Regine Sitruk-Ware
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 4.736

Review 2.  Third-generation Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists: Why Do We Need a Fourth?

Authors:  Elise P Gomez-Sanchez
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.105

3.  The Plasminogen Activator System, Glucocorticoid, and Mineralocorticoid Receptors in the Primate Endometrium During Artificial Menstrual Cycles.

Authors:  Esra Demirel; Reem Sabouni; Neelima Chandra; Ov D Slayden; David F Archer
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 3.060

4.  Anti-Tumoral Effects of Anti-Progestins in a Patient-Derived Breast Cancer Xenograft Model.

Authors:  Nathalie Esber; Clément Cherbonnier; Michèle Resche-Rigon; Abdallah Hamze; Mouad Alami; Jérôme Fagart; Hugues Loosfelt; Marc Lombès; Nathalie Chabbert-Buffet
Journal:  Horm Cancer       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 3.869

5.  The Selective Progesterone Receptor Modulator Ulipristal Acetate Inhibits the Activity of the Glucocorticoid Receptor.

Authors:  Benjamin Small; Charles E F Millard; Edwina P Kisanga; Andreanna Burman; Anika Anam; Clare Flannery; Ayman Al-Hendy; Shannon Whirledge
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 5.958

6.  Mechanism of Telapristone Acetate (CDB4124) on Progesterone Receptor Action in Breast Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Batzaya Davaadelger; Alina R Murphy; Susan E Clare; Oukseub Lee; Seema A Khan; J Julie Kim
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 4.736

7.  Novel RU486 (mifepristone) analogues with increased activity against Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis Virus but reduced progesterone receptor antagonistic activity.

Authors:  Aaron DeBono; David R Thomas; Lindsay Lundberg; Chelsea Pinkham; Ying Cao; J Dinny Graham; Christine L Clarke; Kylie M Wagstaff; Sharon Shechter; Kylene Kehn-Hall; David A Jans
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  A molecular switch regulating transcriptional repression and activation of PPARγ.

Authors:  Jinsai Shang; Sarah A Mosure; Jie Zheng; Richard Brust; Jared Bass; Ashley Nichols; Laura A Solt; Patrick R Griffin; Douglas J Kojetin
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Exploring Flexibility of Progesterone Receptor Ligand Binding Domain Using Molecular Dynamics.

Authors:  Liangzhen Zheng; Valerie Chunling Lin; Yuguang Mu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Synthesis, Characterization, and Preliminary In Vitro Cytotoxic Evaluation of a Series of 2-Substituted Benzo [d] [1,3] Azoles.

Authors:  Ozvaldo Linares-Anaya; Alcives Avila-Sorrosa; Francisco Díaz-Cedillo; Luis Ángel Gil-Ruiz; José Correa-Basurto; Domingo Salazar-Mendoza; Adrian L Orjuela; Jorge Alí-Torres; María Teresa Ramírez-Apan; David Morales-Morales
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 4.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.