Literature DB >> 25204572

Clinical practice guidelines for identification, screening and follow-up of individuals at high risk of primary cutaneous melanoma: a systematic review.

C G Watts1, M Dieng, R L Morton, G J Mann, S W Menzies, A E Cust.   

Abstract

Understanding how individuals at high-risk of primary cutaneous melanoma are best identified, screened and followed up will help optimize melanoma prevention strategies and clinical management. We conducted a systematic review of international clinical practice guidelines and documented the quality of supporting evidence for recommendations for clinical management of individuals at high risk of melanoma. Guidelines published between January 2000 and July 2014 were identified from a systematic search of Medline, Embase and four guideline databases; 34 guidelines from 20 countries were included. High-risk characteristics that were consistently reported included many melanocytic naevi, dysplastic naevi, family history, large congenital naevi, and Fitzpatrick Type I and II skin types. Most guidelines identify risk factors and recommend that individuals at high risk of cutaneous melanoma be monitored, but only half of the guidelines provide recommendations for screening based on level of risk. There is disagreement in screening and follow-up recommendations for those with an increased risk of future melanoma. High-level evidence supports long-term screening of individuals at high risk and monitoring using dermoscopy. Evidence is low for defining screening intervals and duration of follow-up, and for skin self-examination, although education about skin self-examination is widely encouraged. Clinical practice guidelines would benefit from a dedicated section for identification, screening and follow-up of individuals at high risk of melanoma. Guidelines could be improved with clear definitions of multiple naevi, family history and frequency of follow-up. Research examining the benefits and costs of alternative management strategies for groups at high risk will enhance the quality of recommendations.
© 2014 British Association of Dermatologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25204572     DOI: 10.1111/bjd.13403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Dermatol        ISSN: 0007-0963            Impact factor:   9.302


  24 in total

1.  Factors in Early Adolescence Associated With a Mole-Prone Phenotype in Late Adolescence.

Authors:  Haoming Xu; Michael A Marchetti; Stephen W Dusza; Esther Chung; Maira Fonseca; Alon Scope; Alan C Geller; Marilyn Bishop; Ashfaq A Marghoob; Allan C Halpern
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 10.282

2.  Communication about melanoma and risk reduction after melanoma diagnosis.

Authors:  Vivian M Rodríguez; Marianne Berwick; Jennifer L Hay
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 3.894

3.  Associations between benign cutaneous nevi and risk of Type 2 diabetes mellitus in men and women: results from two prospective cohort studies.

Authors:  H Dai; Q Sun; C Zhang; X Zhang; W-Q Li; J E Manson; F B Hu; Y Song
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 4.359

4.  Early Detection of New Melanomas by Patients With Melanoma and Their Partners Using a Structured Skin Self-examination Skills Training Intervention: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  June K Robinson; Jeffrey D Wayne; Mary C Martini; Brittney A Hultgren; Kimberly A Mallett; Rob Turrisi
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 10.282

5.  Prevalence and Correlates of Skin Cancer Screening Among Indoor Tanners and Nontanners.

Authors:  Carolyn J Heckman; Elizabeth Handorf; Melissa V Auerbach
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 10.282

6.  A risk prediction model for the development of subsequent primary melanoma in a population-based cohort.

Authors:  A E Cust; C Badcock; J Smith; N E Thomas; L E Haydu; B K Armstrong; M H Law; J F Thompson; P A Kanetsky; C B Begg; Y Shi; A Kricker; I Orlow; A Sharma; S Yoo; S F Leong; M Berwick; D W Ollila; S Lo
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 9.302

7.  Conflicts and contradictions in current skin cancer screening guidelines.

Authors:  K Y Wojcik; L A Escobedo; K A Miller; M Hawkins; O Ahadiat; S Higgins; A Wysong; Myles Cockburn
Journal:  Curr Dermatol Rep       Date:  2017-11-04

8.  Investigation of skin self-examination and sunscreen use in adolescents in northern Cyprus.

Authors:  Didem Mullaaziz; Aslı Kaptanoğlu; Evren Hınçal; Emel Erdal Çalıkoğlu
Journal:  Postepy Dermatol Alergol       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 1.837

9.  Early Phase of Primary Melanoma Growth from the Patient Point of view: A Prospective Cross Sectional Study on Melanoma over 1 mm in Thickness.

Authors:  Nausicaa Malissen; Safia Abed; Nicolas Macagno; Florent Amatore; Anderson Loundou; Florent Grange; Caroline Gaudy-Marqueste; Jean-Jacques Grob
Journal:  Acta Derm Venereol       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 3.875

10.  Proposal for an annual skin examination by a general practitioner for patients at high risk for melanoma: a French cohort study.

Authors:  Cédric Rat; Charlotte Grimault; Gaelle Quereux; Maelenn Dagorne; Aurélie Gaultier; Amir Khammari; Brigitte Dreno; Jean-Michel Nguyen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.