Literature DB >> 25204513

Temporal dynamics of action perception: differences on ERP evoked by object-related and non-object-related actions.

Yannick Wamain1, Ewa Pluciennicka2, Solène Kalénine3.   

Abstract

While neuropsychological dissociations suggest that distinct processes are involved in execution or perception of transitive (object-related) and intransitive (non-object-related) actions, the few neuroimaging studies that directly contrasted the brain activations underlying transitive and intransitive gesture perception failed to find substantial differences between the two action types. However, the distinction could be visible on brain activity timing within the fronto-parietal network. In this study, we used Event-Related Potential (ERP) method to assess the temporal dynamics of object-related and non-object-related action processing. Although both meaningful, only object-related actions involve object motor features. Accordingly, perception of the two action types would show distinct neural correlates. Participants were presented with four movie types (ORA, Object-Related Action, NORA: Non-Object-Related Action and 2 control movies) and were instructed to perform tasks that required explicit or implicit action recognition (specific action recognition or color change detection). Movies were presented as Point-Light Display (PLD) and thus provided only information about gesture kinematics regardless of action type. ERP were computed during movie visual perception and analyzed as a function of movie type and task. The main result revealed a difference between ORA and NORA on the amplitude of the P3a component in the fronto-parietal region. The difference observed around 250 ms after movie onset do not likely origin from variation in low-level visual features or attention resource allocation. Instead, we suggest that it reflects incidental recruitment of object attributes during object-related action perception. The exact nature of these attributes is discussed.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Action perception; EEG; Object knowledge; Point Light Display; Transitive and Intransitive Action

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25204513     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.08.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  6 in total

1.  Sensory and semantic activations evoked by action attributes of manipulable objects: Evidence from ERPs.

Authors:  Chia-Lin Lee; Hsu-Wen Huang; Kara D Federmeier; Laurel J Buxbaum
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-11-26       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Social-affective features drive human representations of observed actions.

Authors:  Diana C Dima; Tyler M Tomita; Christopher J Honey; Leyla Isik
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 8.713

Review 3.  A Cognitive Overview of Limb Apraxia.

Authors:  Angela Bartolo; Heidi Stieglitz Ham
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 4.  Towards a unified perspective of object shape and motion processing in human dorsal cortex.

Authors:  Gennady Erlikhman; Gideon P Caplovitz; Gennadiy Gurariy; Jared Medina; Jacqueline C Snow
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2018-05-18

5.  ERPs Differentially Reflect Automatic and Deliberate Processing of the Functional Manipulability of Objects.

Authors:  Christopher R Madan; Yvonne Y Chen; Anthony Singhal
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Neural dynamics of grip and goal integration during the processing of others' actions with objects: An ERP study.

Authors:  Jérémy Decroix; Clémence Roger; Solène Kalénine
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.