Literature DB >> 25204436

Therapy response monitoring of the early effects of a new BRAF inhibitor on melanoma xenograft in mice: evaluation of (18) F-FDG-PET and (18) F-FLT-PET.

Edwin J W Geven1, Stefan Evers2, Tapan K Nayak3, Mats Bergström3, Fei Su4, Danny Gerrits1, Gerben M Franssen1, Otto C Boerman1.   

Abstract

Inhibition of the V600E mutated BRAF kinase gene (BRAF(V600E) ) is an important and effective approach to treating melanomas. A new specific small molecule inhibitor of BRAF(V600E) , PLX3603, showed potent melanoma growth-inhibiting characteristics in preclinical studies and is currently under clinical investigation. In this study we investigated the feasibility of (18) F-FDG and (18) F-FLT-PET to monitor the early effects of the BRAF(V600E) inhibitor in mice with melanoma xenografts. SCID/beige mice with subcutaneous (s.c.) A375 melanoma xenografts, expressing BRAF(V600E) , received the BRAF(V600E) inhibitor twice daily orally (0, 25, 50 and 75 mg/kg). At 1, 3 and 7 days after start of therapy, the uptake of (18) F-FDG and (18) F-FLT in the tumor and normal tissues was determined in ex vivo tissue samples. Serial (18) F-FDG and (18) F-FLT-PET scans were acquired of animals at 1 day before and 1, 3 and 7 days after start of treatment with 75 mg/kg BRAF(V600E) inhibitor. A dose-dependent decrease in (18) F-FDG uptake in the A375 tumors was observed by ex vivo biodistribution analysis. Administration of 75 mg/kg BRAF inhibitor for 1, 3 and 7 days resulted in a significantly decreased (18) F-FDG uptake in A375 tumors (41, 35 and 51%, respectively). (18) F-FLT uptake in the A375 tumors was low at baseline and no significant changes in (18) F-FLT uptake were observed at any of the doses administered. These effects were corroborated by serial in vivo (18) F-FDG and (18) F-FLT-PET imaging. These data demonstrate that (18) F-FDG-PET can be used as an imaging biomarker to noninvasively evaluate the early effects of PLX3603.
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRAF inhibitor; FDG-PET; FLT-PET; biomarker; therapy response monitoring

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25204436     DOI: 10.1002/cmmi.1619

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1555-4309            Impact factor:   3.161


  4 in total

1.  18F-FLT and 18F-FDG PET-CT imaging in the evaluation of early therapeutic effects of chemotherapy on Walker 256 tumor-bearing rats.

Authors:  Weina Xu; Shupeng Yu; Jun Xin; Qiyong Guo
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 2.  Integration of Mitochondrial Targeting for Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

Authors:  Philippe Marchetti; Pierre Guerreschi; Laurent Mortier; Jerome Kluza
Journal:  Int J Cell Biol       Date:  2015-12-02

3.  Vemurafenib plus cobimetinib in unresectable stage IIIc or stage IV melanoma: response monitoring and resistance prediction with positron emission tomography and tumor characteristics (REPOSIT): study protocol of a phase II, open-label, multicenter study.

Authors:  Bernies van der Hiel; John B A G Haanen; Marcel P M Stokkel; Daniel S Peeper; Connie R Jimenez; Jos H Beijnen; Bart A van de Wiel; Ronald Boellaard; Alfons J M van den Eertwegh
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  18F-FDG-PET/CT and diffusion-weighted MRI for monitoring a BRAF and CDK 4/6 inhibitor combination therapy in a murine model of human melanoma.

Authors:  Ralf S Eschbach; Philipp M Kazmierczak; Maurice M Heimer; Andrei Todica; Heidrun Hirner-Eppeneder; Moritz J Schneider; Georg Keinrath; Olga Solyanik; Jessica Olivier; Wolfgang G Kunz; Maximilian F Reiser; Peter Bartenstein; Jens Ricke; Clemens C Cyran
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 3.909

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.