Literature DB >> 25204237

The 5th National Audit Project (NAP5) on accidental awareness during general anaesthesia: patient experiences, human factors, sedation, consent and medicolegal issues.

T M Cook1, J Andrade, D G Bogod, J M Hitchman, W R Jonker, N Lucas, J H Mackay, A F Nimmo, K O'Connor, E P O'Sullivan, R G Paul, J H MacG Palmer, F Plaat, J J Radcliffe, M R J Sury, H E Torevell, M Wang, J Hainsworth, J J Pandit.   

Abstract

The 5th National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland into accidental awareness during general anaesthesia yielded data related to psychological aspects from the patient, and the anaesthetist, perspectives; patients' experiences ranged from isolated auditory or tactile sensations to complete awareness. A striking finding was that 75% of experiences were for < 5 min, yet 51% of patients (95% CI 43-60%) experienced distress and 41% (95% CI 33-50%) suffered longer-term adverse effect. Distress and longer-term harm occurred across the full range of experiences but were particularly likely when the patient experienced paralysis (with or without pain). The patient's interpretation of what is happening at the time of the awareness seemed central to later impact; explanation and reassurance during suspected accidental awareness during general anaesthesia or at the time of report seemed beneficial. Quality of care before the event was judged good in 26%, poor in 39% and mixed in 31%. Three quarters of cases of accidental awareness during general anaesthesia (75%) were judged preventable. In 12% of cases of accidental awareness during general anaesthesia, care was judged good and the episode not preventable. The contributory and human factors in the genesis of the majority of cases of accidental awareness during general anaesthesia included medication, patient and education/training. The findings have implications for national guidance, institutional organisation and individual practice. The incidence of 'accidental awareness' during sedation (~1:15 000) was similar to that during general anaesthesia (~1:19 000). The project raises significant issues about information giving and consent for both sedation and anaesthesia. We propose a novel approach to describing sedation from the patient's perspective which could be used in communication and consent. Eight (6%) of the patients had resorted to legal action (12, 11%, to formal complaint) at the time of reporting. The 5th National Audit Project methodology provides a standardised template that might usefully inform the investigation of claims or serious incidents related to accidental awareness during general anaesthesia.
© 2014 by the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland. This article is being published jointly in Anaesthesia and the British Journal of Anaesthesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25204237     DOI: 10.1111/anae.12827

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  11 in total

Review 1.  Accidental awareness under general anaesthesia: Incidence, risk factors, and psychological management.

Authors:  M C Kim; G L Fricchione; O Akeju
Journal:  BJA Educ       Date:  2021-01-21

Review 2.  Anaesthesia for the parturient with obesity.

Authors:  S D Patel; A S Habib
Journal:  BJA Educ       Date:  2021-02-17

3.  Assessing anesthetic activity through modulation of the membrane dipole potential.

Authors:  Benjamin Michael Davis; Jonathan Brenton; Sterenn Davis; Ehtesham Shamsher; Claudia Sisa; Ljuban Grgic; M Francesca Cordeiro
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 5.922

4.  Intraoperative awareness and experience with a ketamine-based anaesthesia package to support emergency and essential surgery when no anaesthetist is available.

Authors:  Sarah Villegas; Sebastian Suarez; Joseph Owuor; Gabriella M Wuyke; Brett D Nelson; Javan Imbamba; Debora Rogo; Khama Rogo; Thomas F Burke
Journal:  Afr J Emerg Med       Date:  2018-07-26

Review 5.  Smooth Extubation and Smooth Emergence Techniques: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Tiffany H Wong; Garret Weber; Apolonia E Abramowicz
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2021-01-15

Review 6.  Neuromuscular blockade in the elderly patient.

Authors:  Luis A Lee; Vassilis Athanassoglou; Jaideep J Pandit
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 3.133

7.  The measurement of adult blood pressure and management of hypertension before elective surgery: Joint Guidelines from the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland and the British Hypertension Society.

Authors:  A Hartle; T McCormack; J Carlisle; S Anderson; A Pichel; N Beckett; T Woodcock; A Heagerty
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2016-01-17       Impact factor: 6.955

8.  Recommendations for standards of monitoring during anaesthesia and recovery 2015: Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland.

Authors:  M R Checketts; R Alladi; K Ferguson; L Gemmell; J M Handy; A A Klein; N J Love; U Misra; C Morris; M H Nathanson; G E Rodney; R Verma; J J Pandit
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 6.955

9.  Nurse anaesthetist students' experiences of patient dignity in perioperative practice-a hermeneutic study.

Authors:  Berit T Valeberg; Ingrid Liodden; Bergsvein Grimsmo; Lillemor Lindwall
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2017-11-30

10.  Are We Meeting the Current Standards of Consent for Anesthesia? An International Survey of Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Tomas Jovaisa; Ieva Norkiene; Juri Karjagin; Iveta Golubovska; Lukas Gambickas; Migle Kalinauskaite; Evaldas Kauzonas; Dhuleep Wijayatilake
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-10-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.