Literature DB >> 25203688

The Ingestion of 39 or 64 g·h(-1) of Carbohydrate is Equally Effective at Improving Endurance Exercise Performance in Cyclists.

Michael L Newell1, Angus M Hunter, Claire Lawrence, Kevin D Tipton, D R Galloway S.   

Abstract

In an investigator-blind, randomized cross-over design, male cyclists (mean± SD) age 34.0 (± 10.2) years, body mass 74.6 (±7.9) kg, stature 178.3 (±8.0) cm, peak power output (PPO) 393 (±36) W, and VO2max 62 (±9) ml·kg-1·min(-1) training for more than 6 hr/wk for more than 3y (n = 20) completed four experimental trials. Each trial consisted of a 2-hr constant load ride at 95% of lactate threshold (185 ± 25 W) then a work-matched time trial task (~30 min at 70% of PPO). Three commercially available carbohydrate (CHO) beverages, plus a control (water), were administered during the 2-hr ride providing 0, 20, 39, or 64 g·hr-1 of CHO at a fluid intake rate of 1L·hr(-1). Performance was assessed by time to complete the time trial task, mean power output sustained, and pacing strategy used. Mean task completion time (min:sec ± SD) for 39 g·hr(-1) (34:19.5 ± 03:07.1, p = .006) and 64 g·hr(-1) (34:11.3 ± 03:08.5 p = .004) of CHO were significantly faster than control (37:01.9 ± 05:35.0). The mean percentage improvement from control was -6.1% (95% CI: -11.3 to -1.0) and -6.5% (95% CI: -11.7 to -1.4) in the 39 and 64 g·hr(-1) trials respectively. The 20 g·hr(-1) (35:17.6 ± 04:16.3) treatment did not reach statistical significance compared with control (p = .126) despite a mean improvement of -3.7% (95% CI -8.8-1.5%). No further differences between CHO trials were reported. No interaction between CHO dose and pacing strategy occurred. 39 and 64 g·hr-1 of CHO were similarly effective at improving endurance cycling performance compared with a 0 g·hr(-1) control in our trained cyclists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25203688     DOI: 10.1123/ijsnem.2014-0134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab        ISSN: 1526-484X            Impact factor:   4.599


  5 in total

Review 1.  Post-exercise Ingestion of Carbohydrate, Protein and Water: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis for Effects on Subsequent Athletic Performance.

Authors:  Danielle McCartney; Ben Desbrow; Christopher Irwin
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Carbohydrate hydrogel beverage provides no additional cycling performance benefit versus carbohydrate alone.

Authors:  Daniel A Baur; Harrison R Toney; Michael J Saunders; Katherine G Baur; Nicholas D Luden; Christopher J Womack
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Meta-Analysis of Carbohydrate Solution Intake during Prolonged Exercise in Adults: From the Last 45+ Years' Perspective.

Authors:  Dimitrios I Bourdas; Athanasios Souglis; Emmanouil D Zacharakis; Nickos D Geladas; Antonios K Travlos
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 5.717

4.  Metabolic Responses to Carbohydrate Ingestion during Exercise: Associations between Carbohydrate Dose and Endurance Performance.

Authors:  Michael L Newell; Gareth A Wallis; Angus M Hunter; Kevin D Tipton; Stuart D R Galloway
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 5.  International society of sports nutrition position stand: nutrient timing.

Authors:  Chad M Kerksick; Shawn Arent; Brad J Schoenfeld; Jeffrey R Stout; Bill Campbell; Colin D Wilborn; Lem Taylor; Doug Kalman; Abbie E Smith-Ryan; Richard B Kreider; Darryn Willoughby; Paul J Arciero; Trisha A VanDusseldorp; Michael J Ormsbee; Robert Wildman; Mike Greenwood; Tim N Ziegenfuss; Alan A Aragon; Jose Antonio
Journal:  J Int Soc Sports Nutr       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 5.150

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.