Literature DB >> 25203268

The impact of extended warm ischemia time on late renal function after robotic partial nephrectomy.

Homayoun Zargar1, Oktay Akca, Daniel Ramirez, Luis Felipe Brandao, Humberto Laydner, Jayram Krishnan, Robert J Stein, Jihad H Kaouk.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of warm ischemia time (WIT) on late renal function in patients undergoing robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2009 to June 2013, patients with tumors ≤7 cm (cT1) undergoing RPN at our center with at least 1-year renal function data were included. Patients with deterioration of renal function due to coexisting medical conditions and patients with a solitary kidney were excluded from the analysis. We compared our cohort based on three WIT groups, namely, zero ischemia (WIT=0 minutes), limited ischemia (WIT ≤30 minutes), and extended ischemia (WIT >30 minutes).
RESULTS: From the 665 patients undergoing RPN, 266 met our inclusion criteria. Median follow up for evaluation of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 24 months. Zero ischemia group had the highest percentage of renal function preservation (92.9%) followed by WIT ≤30 group (89.2%) and WIT >30 group (83.2%). On univariable analysis, pre-existing eGFR, tumor size, RENAL score, and WIT were significant predictors of degree of late eGFR preservation. On multivariable analysis, tumor size, pre-existing eGFR, and WIT grouping remained the only significant predictors of late renal function. There was no statistical significance in degree of late eGFR preservation between zero ischemia and WIT ≤30 groups. However, WIT >30 minutes was a negative predictor of late eGFR preservation when compared to WIT ≤30 minutes.
CONCLUSIONS: WIT >30 minutes, preoperative eGFR, and tumor size were independent predictors of late eGFR deterioration after RPN in our series. With increase in the use of RPN in more complex tumors, the prolonged WIT associated with resection and reconstruction of such tumors needs to be mitigated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25203268     DOI: 10.1089/end.2014.0557

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  9 in total

Review 1.  Zero ischaemia partial nephrectomy: a call for standardized nomenclature and functional outcomes.

Authors:  Ahmad Alenezi; Giacomo Novara; Alexander Mottrie; Salah Al-Buheissi; Omer Karim
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Organ-sparing procedures in GU cancer: part 1-organ-sparing procedures in renal and adrenal tumors: a systematic review.

Authors:  Raouf Seyam; Mahmoud I Khalil; Mohamed H Kamel; Waleed M Altaweel; Rodney Davis; Nabil K Bissada
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Off-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy does not benefit short-term renal function: a matched cohort analysis.

Authors:  Barrett G Anderson; Aaron M Potretzke; Kefu Du; Joel Vetter; R Sherburne Figenshau
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-08-31

4.  Effect of ulinastatin on postoperative renal function in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Bora Lee; Sook Young Lee; Na Young Kim; Koon Ho Rha; Young Deuk Choi; Sujung Park; So Yeon Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Evaluation of oncological outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy according to the type of hilar control approach (On-clamp vs Off-clamp), a multicentric study of the French network of research on kidney cancer-UROCCR 58-NCT03293563.

Authors:  Adil Mellouki; Imad Bentellis; Arnoult Morrone; Nicolas Doumerc; Jean-Baptiste Beauval; Morgane Roupret; François-Xavier Nouhaud; Cedric Lebacle; Jean-Alexandre Long; Daniel Chevallier; Brannwel Tibi; Aysha Shaikh; L Imbert de la Phalecque; Pierre Pillot; Xavier Tillou; Jean-Christophe Bernhard; Matthieu Durand; Youness Ahallal
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy is safe and effective for complex renal masses when performed by experienced surgeons.

Authors:  Tristan S Juvet; R Houston Thompson; Aaron M Potretzke
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-12

7.  Robot-Assisted versus Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy for Giant Sporadic Renal Angiomyolipomas of ≥7 cm: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

Authors:  Yunqiang Xiong; Wen Deng; Ru Chen; Xiaoqiang Liu; Ke Zhu; Jiayao Wang; Jiahui Long; Haoxin Jiang; Luyao Chen; Bin Fu
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 4.375

Review 8.  New imaging technologies for robotic kidney cancer surgery.

Authors:  Stefano Puliatti; Ahmed Eissa; Enrico Checcucci; Pietro Piazza; Marco Amato; Stefania Ferretti; Simone Scarcella; Juan Gomez Rivas; Mark Taratkin; Josè Marenco; Ines Belenchon Rivero; Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski; Giovanni Cacciamani; Ahmed El-Sherbiny; Ahmed Zoeir; Abdelhamid M El-Bahnasy; Ruben De Groote; Alexandre Mottrie; Salvatore Micali
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2022-06-01

9.  Comparison of Renal Function between Robot-Assisted and Open Partial Nephrectomy as Determined by Tc 99m-DTPA Renal Scintigraphy.

Authors:  Chanwoo Lee; Taekmin Kwon; Sangjun Yoo; Jaeyoon Jung; Chunwoo Lee; Dalsan You; In Gab Jeong; Choung-Soo Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 2.153

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.