Akio Nagaki1, Masahisa Onoguchi, Norikazu Matsutomo. 1. aDepartment of Radiological Technology, Kurashiki Central Hospital bDepartment of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University, Ishikawa cDepartment of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Accurate estimation of radiopharmaceutical uptake in the brain is difficult because of count statistics, low spatial resolution, and smoothing filter. The aim of this study was to assess the counting rate performance of PET scanners and the image quality with different combinations of high-resolution image reconstruction algorithms in brain F-2-fluorodeoxy-D-glucose (F-FDG)-PET. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using 23 patient studies, we analyzed the coincidence rates of true and random, random fraction, and the noise equivalent counts per axial length (NECpatient) in brain and liver bed positions. The reconstruction algorithms were combined with baseline ordered subsets expectation maximization, Gaussian filter (GF), point spread function (PSF), and time-of-flight (TOF). The image quality of the brain cortex was quantitatively evaluated with respect to spatial resolution, contrast, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). RESULTS: The true coincidence rate in the brain was higher by 1.86 times and the random coincidence rate was lower by 0.61 times compared with that in the liver. In the brain, random fraction was lower and NECpatient was higher than that of the liver. Although GF improved the SNR, spatial resolution and contrast were reduced by 12 and 11%, respectively (P<0.01). PSF improved spatial resolution and SNR by 11 and 53%, respectively (P<0.01), and TOF improved SNR by ∼23% (P<0.01). CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated that a high-resolution image reconstruction algorithm for brain F-FDG-PET is promising without the use of a GF because of high true coincidence counts and that combined with PSF and TOF is optimal for obtaining a better SNR of the image.
OBJECTIVES: Accurate estimation of radiopharmaceutical uptake in the brain is difficult because of count statistics, low spatial resolution, and smoothing filter. The aim of this study was to assess the counting rate performance of PET scanners and the image quality with different combinations of high-resolution image reconstruction algorithms in brain F-2-fluorodeoxy-D-glucose (F-FDG)-PET. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using 23 patient studies, we analyzed the coincidence rates of true and random, random fraction, and the noise equivalent counts per axial length (NECpatient) in brain and liver bed positions. The reconstruction algorithms were combined with baseline ordered subsets expectation maximization, Gaussian filter (GF), point spread function (PSF), and time-of-flight (TOF). The image quality of the brain cortex was quantitatively evaluated with respect to spatial resolution, contrast, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). RESULTS: The true coincidence rate in the brain was higher by 1.86 times and the random coincidence rate was lower by 0.61 times compared with that in the liver. In the brain, random fraction was lower and NECpatient was higher than that of the liver. Although GF improved the SNR, spatial resolution and contrast were reduced by 12 and 11%, respectively (P<0.01). PSF improved spatial resolution and SNR by 11 and 53%, respectively (P<0.01), and TOF improved SNR by ∼23% (P<0.01). CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated that a high-resolution image reconstruction algorithm for brain F-FDG-PET is promising without the use of a GF because of high true coincidence counts and that combined with PSF and TOF is optimal for obtaining a better SNR of the image.
Authors: Chih-Yang Hsu; Mike Doubrovin; Chia-Ho Hua; Omar Mohammed; Barry L Shulkin; Sue Kaste; Sara Federico; Monica Metzger; Matthew Krasin; Christopher Tinkle; Thomas E Merchant; John T Lucas Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-03-02 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Silvia Morbelli; Giuseppe Esposito; Javier Arbizu; Henryk Barthel; Ronald Boellaard; Nico I Bohnen; David J Brooks; Jacques Darcourt; John C Dickson; David Douglas; Alexander Drzezga; Jacob Dubroff; Ozgul Ekmekcioglu; Valentina Garibotto; Peter Herscovitch; Phillip Kuo; Adriaan Lammertsma; Sabina Pappata; Iván Peñuelas; John Seibyl; Franck Semah; Livia Tossici-Bolt; Elsmarieke Van de Giessen; Koen Van Laere; Andrea Varrone; Michele Wanner; George Zubal; Ian Law Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2020-05-09 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: D D N Wimalarathne; Weiwei Ruan; Xun Sun; Fang Liu; Yongkang Gai; Qingyao Liu; Fan Hu; Xiaoli Lan Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Date: 2022-03-02