OBJECTIVE: To determine whether hand hygiene adherence is influenced by peer effects and, specifically, whether the presence and proximity of other healthcare workers has a positive effect on hand hygiene adherence. DESIGN: An observational study using a sensor network. SETTING: A 20-bed medical intensive care unit at a large university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Hospital staff assigned to the medical intensive care unit. METHODS: We deployed a custom-built, automated, hand hygiene monitoring system that can (1) detect whether a healthcare worker has practiced hand hygiene on entering and exiting a patient's room and (2) estimate the location of other healthcare workers with respect to each healthcare worker exiting or entering a room. RESULTS: We identified a total of 47,694 in-room and out-of-room hand hygiene opportunities during the 10-day study period. When a worker was alone (no recent healthcare worker contacts), the observed adherence rate was 20.85% (95% confidence interval [CI], 19.78%-21.92%). In contrast, when other healthcare workers were present, observed adherence was 27.90% (95% CI, 27.48%-28.33%). This absolute increase was statistically significant (P < .01). We also found that adherence increased with the number of nearby healthcare workers but at a decreasing rate. These results were consistent at different times of day, for different measures of social context, and after controlling for possible confounding factors. CONCLUSIONS: The presence and proximity of other healthcare workers is associated with higher hand hygiene rates. Furthermore, our results also indicate that rates increase as the social environment becomes more crowded, but with diminishing marginal returns.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether hand hygiene adherence is influenced by peer effects and, specifically, whether the presence and proximity of other healthcare workers has a positive effect on hand hygiene adherence. DESIGN: An observational study using a sensor network. SETTING: A 20-bed medical intensive care unit at a large university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Hospital staff assigned to the medical intensive care unit. METHODS: We deployed a custom-built, automated, hand hygiene monitoring system that can (1) detect whether a healthcare worker has practiced hand hygiene on entering and exiting a patient's room and (2) estimate the location of other healthcare workers with respect to each healthcare worker exiting or entering a room. RESULTS: We identified a total of 47,694 in-room and out-of-room hand hygiene opportunities during the 10-day study period. When a worker was alone (no recent healthcare worker contacts), the observed adherence rate was 20.85% (95% confidence interval [CI], 19.78%-21.92%). In contrast, when other healthcare workers were present, observed adherence was 27.90% (95% CI, 27.48%-28.33%). This absolute increase was statistically significant (P < .01). We also found that adherence increased with the number of nearby healthcare workers but at a decreasing rate. These results were consistent at different times of day, for different measures of social context, and after controlling for possible confounding factors. CONCLUSIONS: The presence and proximity of other healthcare workers is associated with higher hand hygiene rates. Furthermore, our results also indicate that rates increase as the social environment becomes more crowded, but with diminishing marginal returns.
Authors: Tim Eckmanns; Jan Bessert; Michael Behnke; Petra Gastmeier; Henning Ruden Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2006-08-22 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Vicki Erasmus; Thea J Daha; Hans Brug; Jan Hendrik Richardus; Myra D Behrendt; Margreet C Vos; Ed F van Beeck Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Thomas R Talbot; James G Johnson; Claudette Fergus; John Henry Domenico; William Schaffner; Titus L Daniels; Greg Wilson; Jennifer Slayton; Nancye Feistritzer; Gerald B Hickson Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2013-09-23 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Sandra M Swoboda; Karen Earsing; Kevin Strauss; Stephen Lane; Pamela A Lipsett Journal: Am J Infect Control Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 2.918
Authors: Thomas Hornbeck; David Naylor; Alberto M Segre; Geb Thomas; Ted Herman; Philip M Polgreen Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2012-10-08 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Richard T Ellison; Constance M Barysauskas; Elke A Rundensteiner; Di Wang; Bruce Barton Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis Date: 2015-08-26 Impact factor: 3.835