Literature DB >> 25202839

Localized metabolic and t2 changes induced by voluntary and evoked contractions.

Marc Jubeau1, Yann LE Fur, Guillaume Duhamel, Jennifer Wegrzyk, Sylviane Confort-Gouny, Christophe Vilmen, Patrick J Cozzone, Jean Pierre Mattei, David Bendahan, Julien Gondin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study compared the metabolic and activation changes induced by electrically evoked (neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES)) and voluntary (VOL) contractions performed at the same submaximal intensity using P chemical shift imaging (CSI) and T2 mapping investigations.
METHODS: Fifteen healthy subjects were asked to perform both NMES and VOL protocols with the knee extensors (i.e., 232 isometric contractions at 30% of maximal force) inside a 3-T scanner for two experimental sessions. During the first session, metabolic variations, i.e., phosphocreatine (PCr), inorganic phosphate (Pi), and pH, were recorded using localized P CSI. During a second session, T2 maps of the knee extensors were obtained at rest and immediately after each exercise. Voxels of interest were selected from the directly stimulated vastus lateralis and from the nondirectly stimulated rectus femoris/vastus intermedius muscles.
RESULTS: PCr depletion recorded throughout the NMES session was significantly larger in the vastus lateralis as compared with the rectus femoris/vastus intermedius muscles for both conditions (VOL and NMES). A higher occurrence of Pi splitting and a greater acidosis was found during NMES as compared with VOL exercise, illustrating the heterogeneous activation of both slow and fast muscle fibers. T2 changes were greater after NMES as compared with VOL for both muscles but were not necessarily related to the localized metabolic demand.
CONCLUSION: We provided direct evidence that the metabolic demand was strongly related to both the exercise modality and the site of stimulation. On the basis of the occurrence of Pi splitting, we suggested that NMES can activate fast muscle fibers even at low force levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25202839     DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000491

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  5 in total

1.  Effects of training intensity in electromyostimulation on human skeletal muscle.

Authors:  Toshiharu Natsume; Hayao Ozaki; Ryo Kakigi; Hiroyuki Kobayashi; Hisashi Naito
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Local Muscle Metabolic Demand Induced by Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation and Voluntary Contractions at Different Force Levels: A NIRS Study.

Authors:  Makii Muthalib; Graham Kerr; Kazunori Nosaka; Stephane Perrey
Journal:  Eur J Transl Myol       Date:  2016-06-13

3.  Stability and sensitivity of water T2 obtained with IDEAL-CPMG in healthy and fat-infiltrated skeletal muscle.

Authors:  Christopher D J Sinclair; Jasper M Morrow; Robert L Janiczek; Matthew R B Evans; Elham Rawah; Sachit Shah; Michael G Hanna; Mary M Reilly; Tarek A Yousry; John S Thornton
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 4.044

4.  Hip and Knee Joint Angles Determine Fatigue Onset during Quadriceps Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation.

Authors:  Jonathan Galvão Tenório Cavalcante; Álvaro de Almeida Ventura; Leandro Gomes de Jesus Ferreira; Alessandra Martins Melo de Sousa; Ivo Vieira de Sousa Neto; Rita de Cássia Marqueti; Nicolas Babault; João Luiz Quagliotti Durigan
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 1.664

5.  Responders to Wide-Pulse, High-Frequency Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Show Reduced Metabolic Demand: A 31P-MRS Study in Humans.

Authors:  Jennifer Wegrzyk; Alexandre Fouré; Yann Le Fur; Nicola A Maffiuletti; Christophe Vilmen; Maxime Guye; Jean-Pierre Mattei; Nicolas Place; David Bendahan; Julien Gondin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.