| Literature DB >> 25202602 |
Rui-Hong Wang1, Chuan Chen2, Qing Ma1, Pan Li1, Cheng-Xin Fu3.
Abstract
PREMISE OF THE STUDY: To elucidate the population genetics and phylogeography of Scrophularia incisa, microsatellite primers were developed. We also applied these microsatellite markers to its closely related species S. dentata and S. kiriloviana. • METHODS ANDEntities:
Keywords: Qinghai–Tibet Plateau; Scrophularia dentata; Scrophularia kiriloviana; genetic diversity; medicinal herb; microsatellite
Year: 2014 PMID: 25202602 PMCID: PMC4103606 DOI: 10.3732/apps.1300077
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Appl Plant Sci ISSN: 2168-0450 Impact factor: 1.936
Information on representative voucher specimens deposited at the Herbarium of Zhejiang University (HZU), Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
| Taxon | Population code | Location | Altitude (m) | Geographic coordinates | Voucher no. |
| MZ | Manzhouli, Inner Mongolia, China | 650 | 49°05′40.07″N, 117°30′36.34″E | CXF100704 | |
| GD | Gandi, Qinghai Province, China | 3066 | 36°22′37.1″N, 100°22′16.9″E | WRH110703 | |
| ZY | Zhangye, Gansu Province, China | 2753 | 38°32′32.46″N, 100°15′00.39″E | LP1109069 | |
| QL | Qilian, Qinghai Province, China | 2985 | 38°10′04.17″N, 100°00′58.06″E | LP1109068 | |
| RK | Xigaze, Tibet, China | 3807 | 29°20′35.47″N, 89°38′01.45″E | LP0907045 | |
| LS | Lhasa, Tibet, China | 3768 | 29°42′32.47″N, 91°09′42.52″E | LP0907046 | |
| WS | Wensu, Xinjiang, China | 2458 | 42°55′23.00″N, 83°39′12.09″E | WRH13070 | |
| TS | Tashkurgan, Xinjiang, China | 3106 | 37°47′12.54″N, 75°13′08.89″E | WRH130706 |
Characteristics of 12 compound microsatellite loci developed for Scrophularia incisa.
| Locus | Repeat motif | Primer sequences (5′–3′) | Allele size range (bp) | GenBank accession no. | ||
| Scin1 | (AC)6(AG)19 | F: (AC)6(AG)5 | 109–128 | 54 | 23 | JQ773338 |
| R: TGAAGACGGAAGAAGAAGG | ||||||
| Scin2 | (AC)6(AG)8 | F: (AC)6(AG)5 | 140–158 | 55 | 20 | JQ773339 |
| R: ACTTGTATGGCGGGCTTG | ||||||
| Scin3 | (AC)6(AG)5 | F: (AC)6(AG)5 | 144–162 | 55 | 18 | JQ773340 |
| R: TTGCAGCATTTTGTTTCC | ||||||
| Scin4 | (AC)6(AG)14 | F: (AC)6(AG)5 | 225–243 | 55 | 26 | JQ773341 |
| R: GTTTCCCGATGACAGACG | ||||||
| Scin5 | (AC)6(AG)15 | F: (AC)6(AG)5 | 291–309 | 54 | 19 | JQ773342 |
| R: GAATGAAGTTGTTGGAGC | ||||||
| Scin6 | (AC)6(AG)14 | F: (AC)6(AG)5 | 113–132 | 54 | 21 | JQ773343 |
| R: CATGGCCTGCTTAAATTAC | ||||||
| Scin7 | (AC)6(AG)14 | F: (AC)6(AG)5 | 183–201 | 56 | 25 | JQ773344 |
| R: TGGTCCGAGGCTTTACAT | ||||||
| Scin8 | (AC)6(AG)10 | F: (AC)6(AG)5 | 107–126 | 56 | 19 | JQ773345 |
| R: TATCATGGGAGAAAGTCGA | ||||||
| Scin9 | (AC)6(AG)10 | F: (AC)6(AG)5 | 110–128 | 55 | 14 | JQ773346 |
| R: CGAGAAACCCAAGGAAAG | ||||||
| Scin10 | (AC)6(AG)16 | F: (AC)6(AG)5 | 144–164 | 54 | 15 | JQ773347 |
| R: TCAGGAATTGGATCAGAAAC | ||||||
| Scin11 | (AC)6(AG)9 | F: (AC)6(AG)5 | 273–294 | 55 | 15 | JQ773348 |
| R: AGTTGTTGGAGCATTGTTTTC | ||||||
| Scin12 | (AC)6(AG)9 | F: (AC)6(AG)5 | 132–162 | 54 | 22 | JQ773349 |
| R: AACAATGGTGGAGAAAGGTA |
Note: A = number of alleles per locus; F = forward primer; R = reverse primer; Ta = optimized annealing temperature.
Results of initial primer screening in four populations of Scrophularia incisa.
| Locus | Population MZ ( | Population GD ( | Population ZY ( | Population QL ( | ||||||||||||
| HWE | HWE | HWE | HWE | |||||||||||||
| Scin1 | 8 | 0.950 | 0.874 | 0.0069** | 7 | 0.800 | 0.695 | 0.2973 | 9 | 0.944 | 0.789 | 0.026* | 8 | 0.750 | 0.787 | 0.1041 |
| Scin2 | 6 | 0.850 | 0.806 | 0.1555 | 7 | 0.900 | 0.803 | 0.9065 | 6 | 0.389 | 0.738 | 0.000** | 4 | 0.800 | 0.746 | 0.0517 |
| Scin3 | 7 | 0.850 | 0.836 | 0.7407 | 10 | 0.950 | 0.903 | 0.8081 | 8 | 0.889 | 0.827 | 0.690 | 4 | 0.450 | 0.642 | 0.1139 |
| Scin4 | 11 | 0.900 | 0.872 | 0.0262* | 12 | 0.950 | 0.921 | 0.8109 | 8 | 0.833 | 0.840 | 0.309 | 11 | 0.850 | 0.897 | 0.0532 |
| Scin5 | 10 | 0.850 | 0.812 | 0.7471 | 11 | 0.900 | 0.786 | 0.5517 | 6 | 0.833 | 0.787 | 0.186 | 7 | 0.800 | 0.646 | 0.9496 |
| Scin6 | 9 | 0.950 | 0.867 | 0.8221 | 9 | 0.950 | 0.821 | 0.9622 | 9 | 0.944 | 0.873 | 0.180 | 8 | 0.800 | 0.873 | 0.4536 |
| Scin7 | 6 | 0.800 | 0.782 | 0.6407 | 12 | 0.800 | 0.901 | 0.0473* | 7 | 0.611 | 0.757 | 0.075 | 6 | 0.550 | 0.786 | 0.0065** |
| Scin8 | 7 | 0.400 | 0.812 | 0.0000*** | 8 | 0.850 | 0.854 | 0.7488 | 8 | 0.944 | 0.817 | 0.673 | 8 | 0.800 | 0.785 | 0.3367 |
| Scin9 | 9 | 0.800 | 0.879 | 0.1291 | 5 | 0.850 | 0.741 | 0.1276 | 7 | 0.833 | 0.783 | 0.861 | 7 | 0.850 | 0.821 | 0.0013** |
| Scin10 | 7 | 0.750 | 0.829 | 0.3720 | 7 | 0.900 | 0.813 | 0.9964 | 9 | 0.778 | 0.879 | 0.157 | 7 | 0.750 | 0.735 | 0.4054 |
| Scin11 | 6 | 0.750 | 0.755 | 0.5172 | 7 | 0.750 | 0.717 | 0.3867 | 6 | 0.722 | 0.743 | 0.193 | 7 | 0.650 | 0.626 | 0.4729 |
| Scin12 | 7 | 0.900 | 0.827 | 0.0946 | 9 | 0.850 | 0.877 | 0.2666 | 10 | 0.833 | 0.851 | 0.837 | 10 | 0.850 | 0.897 | 0.1581 |
| Mean | 7.75 | 0.813 | 0.829 | 8.50 | 0.871 | 0.819 | 7.75 | 0.742 | 0.770 | 7.25 | 0.779 | 0.782 | ||||
Note: A = number of alleles per locus; He = expected heterozygosity; Ho = observed heterozygosity; HWE = Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium; N = sample size for each population.
Locality and voucher information is provided in Appendix 1.
Significant deviations from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium at *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001, respectively.
Results of primer cross-species amplification in Scrophularia dentata and S. kiriloviana.
| Population RK ( | Population LS ( | Population WS ( | Population TS ( | |||||||||||||
| Locus | HWE | HWE | HWE | HWE | ||||||||||||
| Scin1 | 7 | 1.000 | 0.848 | 0.0014** | 5 | 0.600 | 0.800 | 0.2646 | 9 | 0.850 | 0.777 | 0.7851 | 9 | 0.900 | 0.803 | 0.0178* |
| Scin2 | 4 | 0.933 | 0.609 | 0.0008*** | 2 | 0.200 | 0.337 | 0.3065 | 6 | 0.850 | 0.818 | 0.1466 | 13 | 0.550 | 0.873 | 0.0000*** |
| Scin3 | 5 | 0.400 | 0.743 | 0.0000*** | 2 | 0.400 | 0.505 | 0.5732 | 8 | 0.600 | 0.662 | 0.1540 | 5 | 0.550 | 0.574 | 0.1363 |
| Scin4 | 6 | 0.800 | 0.763 | 0.9335 | 4 | 0.500 | 0.695 | 0.2801 | 9 | 0.800 | 0.878 | 0.5637 | 12 | 0.650 | 0.914 | 0.0076** |
| Scin5 | 6 | 0.867 | 0.807 | 0.5949 | 4 | 0.700 | 0.753 | 0.2933 | 9 | 0.850 | 0.895 | 0.0414* | 11 | 0.500 | 0.823 | 0.0003*** |
| Scin6 | 8 | 0.933 | 0.832 | 0.1842 | 3 | 0.400 | 0.689 | 0.0850 | 11 | 0.800 | 0.894 | 0.5252 | 9 | 0.800 | 0.835 | 0.4918 |
| Scin7 | 6 | 0.800 | 0.699 | 0.0861 | 3 | 0.700 | 0.679 | 1.0000 | 6 | 0.700 | 0.773 | 0.0337* | 12 | 0.500 | 0.922 | 0.0000*** |
| Scin8 | 8 | 0.867 | 0.818 | 0.0001*** | 5 | 0.800 | 0.816 | 0.0998 | 10 | 0.900 | 0.796 | 0.9847 | 8 | 0.550 | 0.854 | 0.0053** |
| Scin9 | 8 | 0.933 | 0.832 | 0.0083** | 3 | 0.800 | 0.700 | 0.1293 | 7 | 0.800 | 0.744 | 0.7117 | 8 | 0.700 | 0.838 | 0.3850 |
| Scin10 | 6 | 0.800 | 0.699 | 0.7845 | 3 | 0.600 | 0.674 | 0.8448 | 8 | 0.550 | 0.565 | 0.6567 | 6 | 0.350 | 0.653 | 0.0016** |
| Scin11 | 7 | 0.867 | 0.818 | 0.6091 | 4 | 0.700 | 0.774 | 0.8559 | 8 | 0.900 | 0.842 | 0.0963 | 8 | 0.400 | 0.873 | 0.0000*** |
| Scin12 | 8 | 0.867 | 0.802 | 0.8971 | 4 | 0.600 | 0.726 | 0.5635 | 6 | 0.750 | 0.742 | 0.9295 | 14 | 0.650 | 0.906 | 0.0001*** |
| Mean | 6.58 | 0.839 | 0.773 | 3.50 | 0.583 | 0.679 | 8.08 | 0.779 | 0.782 | 9.58 | 0.592 | 0.822 | ||||
Note: A = number of alleles per locus; He = expected heterozygosity; Ho = observed heterozygosity; HWE = Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium; N = sample size for each population.
Locality and voucher information is provided in Appendix 1.
Significant deviations from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium at *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001, respectively.