| Literature DB >> 25202564 |
Wei-Xin Jiang1, Wen-Ju Zhang2, Yu-Long Ding1.
Abstract
PREMISE OF THE STUDY: Polymorphic microsatellite markers were developed for Phyllostachys edulis (Poaceae), an ecologically and economically important bamboo species in China, to evaluate the genetic diversity and population genetic structure of P. edulis and other Phyllostachys species. • METHODS ANDEntities:
Keywords: Phyllostachys edulis; Poaceae; bamboo; microsatellite; population genetics
Year: 2013 PMID: 25202564 PMCID: PMC4103127 DOI: 10.3732/apps.1200012
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Appl Plant Sci ISSN: 2168-0450 Impact factor: 1.936
Voucher specimens of Phyllostachys edulis used in this study. All vouchers are deposited in the Herbarium of Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
| Code | Collection locality | Latitude | Longitude | Voucher no. |
| RH | Renhua, Guangdong Province | 25°7′–21′N | 113°48′–58′E | PheRH201106 |
| JO | Jianou, Fujian Province | 26°58′–27°9′N | 118°13′–18′E | PheJO201108 |
| XN | Qian Mountain, Hubei Province | 29°37′–48′N | 114°10′–18′E | PheXN201107 |
Characteristics of 20 polymorphic microsatellite loci for Phyllostachys edulis.
| Locus | Primer sequences (5′–3′) | Repeat motif | Fluorescent label | Allele size (bp) | GenBank accesssion no. |
| Phe01 | F: CACCTCTTTCGTCATCAACC | (AG)29 | 6-FAM | 219–255 | FP093322 |
| R: ATCTAACGGCCCAAATGC | |||||
| Phe10 | F: TAAGGCCCACGTTGCCAG | (AG)19 | 6-FAM | 191–227 | FP095585 |
| R: CGCTGAAATCCACCCAGAAG | |||||
| Phe13 | F: TCGCCATCCCTTATCCAC | (CT)17 | 6-HEX | 160–178 | FP096712 |
| R: GCAACGACGCACCTCCTA | |||||
| Phe23 | F: CCCCATGTTTACCTATCCC | (TC)14 | 6-HEX | 365–389 | FP091611 |
| R: GCATCCTCTTGCGCTTAC | |||||
| Phe24 | F: ACATACCCGCACCACCAA | (AG)14 | 6-HEX | 119–125 | FP092058 |
| R: CGACCACCTCGCAAACAA | |||||
| Phe28 | F: CCTCCGATGAAGCTGAAC | (TC)14 | 6-FAM | 243–261 | FP096429 |
| R: CGGGTCCTTGGACAAACT | |||||
| Phe32 | F: CCTCAAGGCCAGGGTAAG | (CT)13 | 6-FAM | 96–112 | FP092440 |
| R: CTCCGTTTCTTTGGTTTGTT | |||||
| Phe34 | F: GTCGCTCCTCAGTCCTCACA | (AG)13 | 6-HEX | 159–171 | FP096264 |
| R: TCCTGCTCCAGGTATTCGTAA | |||||
| Phe35 | F: AACCACCTCATCACCCACA | (AG)12 | 6-HEX | 212–226 | FP093046 |
| R: GCTTTGCACCCTTTATTGCT | |||||
| Phe37 | F: GCTCTTCGCCAAGTGCTAC | (CT)12 | 6-HEX | 196–213 | FP094642 |
| R: GGGACCCATGCCTGTTCTA | |||||
| Phe40 | F: AGGTTCGTGTTCCGTGGGT | (GA)12 | 6-FAM | 107–111 | FP097227 |
| R: TTAGGCGCAGGAAGGTTGG | |||||
| Phe44 | F: ACTGCGAGGTTCGTGTTC | (GA)12 | 6-FAM | 152–166 | FP099997 |
| R: GTAAAGGTTTGACGGGTAGA | |||||
| Phe51 | F: GTCGCCGTCTCAAGGAGT | (CT)11 | 6-HEX | 158–168 | FP093298 |
| R: GTTGCACCATCGGGATTA | |||||
| Phe98 | F: TCTCCATGCGAATGTGAT | (CCA)8 | 6-FAM | 168–189 | FP094032 |
| R: CGTCTAGTGCTAGGGTTTGT | |||||
| Phe100 | F: GACATTAGGCGAGGTTCGG | (CTT)8 | 6-HEX | 189–204 | FP094809 |
| R: GGGAGATGGACAGGTTTGCT | |||||
| Phe139 | F: TTCCTTCTCGCCGCAAAT | (GCC)7 | 6-FAM | 168–195 | FP096112 |
| R: GGCTTGGGATTGAGACTGG | |||||
| Phe141 | F: AGGCCATAAGGAACTGCT | (CGT)7 | 6-HEX | 321–336 | FP096517 |
| R: GCTTCCAAACCTCCCATC | |||||
| Phe163 | F: CTAACAAAACAAATCCCCATC | (CGC)7 | 6-FAM | 110–125 | FP099798 |
| R: TCCATCGCGTATTCCACC | |||||
| Phe167 | F: AACAGCGAAACCACAGACC | (CCTG)7 | 6-FAM | 151–163 | FP100624 |
| R: AGCAGGATGAGACGAGCC | |||||
| Phe185 | F: TGTAAGTACCCTGCCTCCG | (CAAT)5 | 6-HEX | 145–163 | FP097509 |
| R: GCTGTCTCCCTTCTTCCTG |
All loci were amplified with the same touchdown protocol with initial annealing temperature of 62°C and final annealing temperature of 52°C.
Polymorphism analyses using 20 markers in three geographically disparate populations of Phyllostachys edulis.
| Locus | RH ( | JO ( | XN ( | |||||||||
| Phe01 | 4 | 0.652 | 0.676* | 1.234 | 4 | 0.417 | 0.481* | 0.888 | 6 (2) | 0.125 | 0.364* | 0.836 |
| Phe10 | 6 (2) | 0.130 | 0.612* | 1.233 | 4 (1) | 0.042 | 0.261* | 0.555 | 5 (2) | 0.042 | 0.511* | 1.004 |
| Phe13 | 5 (1) | 0.000 | 0.571* | 1.119 | 3 | 0.042 | 0.284* | 0.513 | 4 | 0.042 | 0.350* | 0.679 |
| Phe23 | 5 | 0.217 | 0.538* | 1.092 | 3 | 0.042 | 0.081* | 0.202 | 6 | 0.125 | 0.332* | 0.779 |
| Phe24 | 4 (1) | 0.130 | 0.339* | 0.702 | 2 | 0.000 | 0.080* | 0.173 | 3 | 0.083 | 0.226* | 0.456 |
| Phe28 | 4 | 0.304 | 0.559* | 1.022 | 4 | 0.042 | 0.228* | 0.503 | 4 | 0.083 | 0.490* | 0.882 |
| Phe32 | 7 (4) | 0.087 | 0.672* | 1.443 | 2 | 0.000 | 0.080* | 0.173 | 3 (1) | 0.042 | 0.155* | 0.334 |
| Phe34 | 3 (1) | 0.000 | 0.510* | 0.876 | 3 | 0.042 | 0.081* | 0.202 | 4 (1) | 0.083 | 0.435* | 0.752 |
| Phe35 | 5 (3) | 0.130 | 0.489* | 1.011 | 1 | — | — | — | 3 (1) | 0.042 | 0.227* | 0.463 |
| Phe37 | 3 | 0.609 | 0.631 | 1.047 | 3 | 1.000 | 0.520* | 0.780 | 3 | 1.000 | 0.569* | 0.918 |
| Phe40 | 3 | 0.087 | 0.355* | 0.632 | 3 | 0.042 | 0.254* | 0.475 | 1 | — | — | — |
| Phe44 | 2 | 0.217 | 0.194 | 0.344 | 1 | — | — | — | 2 | 0.042 | 0.041 | 0.101 |
| Phe51 | 4 (2) | 0.000 | 0.427* | 0.838 | 2 | 0.000 | 0.153* | 0.287 | 3 (1) | 0.000 | 0.226* | 0.456 |
| Phe98 | 4 (1) | 0.043 | 0.542* | 0.982 | 3 | 0.042 | 0.155* | 0.334 | 4 | 0.042 | 0.157* | 0.373 |
| Phe100 | 5 | 0.435 | 0.583* | 1.175 | 4 | 0.125 | 0.228* | 0.503 | 5 | 0.167 | 0.326* | 0.698 |
| Phe139 | 2 | 0.696 | 0.454 | 0.646 | 3 | 1.000 | 0.520 | 0.780 | 5 (2) | 0.917 | 0.554 | 0.946 |
| Phe141 | 4 (1) | 0.391 | 0.578* | 1.032 | 4 (2) | 1.000 | 0.540* | 0.866 | 3 | 0.958 | 0.539* | 0.837 |
| Phe163 | 2 (1) | 0.130 | 0.122 | 0.241 | 2 | 0.042 | 0.041 | 0.101 | 3 (1) | 0.042 | 0.119* | 0.274 |
| Phe167 | 2 | 0.696 | 0.454 | 0.646 | 2 | 0.958 | 0.499* | 0.692 | 2 | 0.833 | 0.486* | 0.679 |
| Phe185 | 3 (1) | 0.739 | 0.509 | 0.771 | 3 | 1.000 | 0.520* | 0.780 | 3 | 0.917 | 0.515 | 0.774 |
Note: — = monomorphic loci; A = number of different alleles; He = expected heterozygosity; Ho = observed heterozygosity; I = Shannon’s information index; pA = number of private alleles per population.
*Significant Hardy–Weinberg disequilibrium (P < 0.005).
All populations located in China, see Appendix 1 for locality information.