| Literature DB >> 25202531 |
Yuzu Sakata1, Shingo Kaneko2, Azusa Hayano3, Miho Inoue-Murayama3, Takayuki Ohgushi4, Yuji Isagi1.
Abstract
PREMISE OF THE STUDY: Microsatellite markers were developed in the perennial herb Solidago altissima from populations within its introduced range in Japan to assess its population structure and to facilitate tracking of invasion expansion. • METHODS ANDEntities:
Keywords: 454 sequencing; Asteraceae; Solidago altissima; invasion; polyploidy
Year: 2013 PMID: 25202531 PMCID: PMC4105288 DOI: 10.3732/apps.1200313
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Appl Plant Sci ISSN: 2168-0450 Impact factor: 1.936
Characteristics of 16 microsatellite primers developed in Solidago altissima. All values are based on 70 samples representing Japanese populations located in Hokkaido, Hyogo, and Kagoshima (N = 22–24 for each).
| Locus | Primer sequences (5′–3′) | Fluorescent label | Repeat motif | Allele size (bp) | GenBank accession no. | |
| Salt1 | F: ACTACTGGCGGCGTAACAG | NED | (ATT)15 | 57 | 180–250 | AB724096 |
| R: CCGCCGGTTTCAATGTTGG | ||||||
| Salt2 | F: TGCATGGTTATTGGTTTCAAATGG | VIC | (AAT)6 | 57 | 185–200 | AB724097 |
| R: CACCCTCACTAGGAGAAACTTG | ||||||
| Salt3 | F: GAAGAAGAGCTTCGGATGTTGT | FAM | (ATT)14 | 57 | 150–230 | AB724098 |
| R: CGCCTAAATTGACTTGACACAG | ||||||
| Salt4 | F: CAGAAGAAACCGCCGGAAG | VIC | (AAC)6 | 57 | 275–305 | AB724099 |
| R: GAGCAATGCAGTGGCAGAC | ||||||
| Salt5 | F: GGCGAAGAAGGGTCGTTTG | FAM | (TGA)8 | 57 | 280–320 | AB724100 |
| R: CCGGAAAGCGTTTGATGGG | ||||||
| Salt6 | F: ACATCTTACCTCCCGGCTC | NED | (GTT)7 | 57 | 305–340 | AB724101 |
| R: CAGCTGACCAGATCAATCACC | ||||||
| Salt7 | F: GGGACAAGGTCCATCAAATCC | FAM | (GAT)6 | 57 | 365–380 | AB724102 |
| R: ACTCCTCTTCTTCTTTGATAACCG | ||||||
| Salt8 | F: ATAGAAGTGGGTCGGCTCC | VIC | (GGT)6 | 57 | 400–415 | AB724103 |
| R: CCCGACTAAGCCCATTTCC | ||||||
| Salt9 | F: TCTTGCTTGTCTTCAGTGGG | NED | (AAT)8 | 57 | 400–500 | AB724104 |
| R: GCGTAACTTCAGTCGCCTC | ||||||
| Salt13 | F: TGAAATTCCAACGTGGCAG | FAM | (AAT)8 | 57 | 270–300 | AB724105 |
| R: GCCAAATGACACCCAACCG | ||||||
| Salt14 | F: CTGGTCACACTCCTAAAGCC | VIC | (AAT)8 | 57 | 260–280 | AB724106 |
| R: ATCGGAAGTCGGGACAAGC | ||||||
| Salt16 | F: CAACGACAGCACATTCGGG | VIC | (AAT)6 | 57 | 315–325 | AB724107 |
| R: CGACACGTCATCAATCGCC | ||||||
| Salt17 | F: GCACCTTCTCCAAATGCCG | FAM | (ACC)8 | 57 | 370–390 | AB724108 |
| R: TGTCCGCTGATACCAGTCC | ||||||
| Salt18 | F: CCTCCACAAACCTTCCGTC | VIC | (ATC)6 | 57 | 315–355 | AB724109 |
| R: AATCTGGGAAACACGTCGC | ||||||
| Salt19 | F: GTACCATTCCACCAAGCCG | NED | (TTG)8 | 57 | 270–340 | AB724110 |
| R: GGCCGACTTGAACCCATTC | ||||||
| Salt21 | F: TCCTTCCTTGTCGAATCGGG | FAM | (AT)8 | 57 | 190–200 | AB724111 |
| R: AAACAAGGCTCCCAGTTGC |
Note: Ta = annealing temperature.
Sequence of the fluorescent labels: FAM = CACGACGTTGTAAAACGAC; NED = CTATAGGGCACGCGTGGT; VIC = TGTGGAATTGTGAGCGG.
Results for primer screening of all samples of 16 microsatellite loci from three populations of Solidago altissima.
| Hokkaido ( | Hyogo ( | Kagoshima ( | ||||||||
| Locus | ||||||||||
| Salt1 | 8 | 0.91 | 0.84 | 17 | 0.99 | 0.90 | 12 | 0.97 | 0.89 | 0.008 |
| Salt2 | 4 | 0.91 | 0.74 | 7 | 0.99 | 0.77 | 4 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 0.13 |
| Salt3 | 12 | 0.99 | 0.90 | 22 | 0.96 | 0.95 | 14 | 0.80 | 0.92 | 0.006 |
| Salt4 | 7 | 0.96 | 0.83 | 8 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 8 | 0.88 | 0.77 | 0.09 |
| Salt5 | 11 | 0.95 | 0.86 | 13 | 0.92 | 0.88 | 10 | 1.00 | 0.88 | 0.19 |
| Salt6 | 8 | 0.71 | 0.77 | 11 | 0.96 | 0.87 | 7 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.05 |
| Salt7 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 5 | 0.88 | 0.69 | 4 | 0.91 | 0.67 | 0.27 |
| Salt8 | 8 | 1.00 | 0.84 | 7 | 0.96 | 0.77 | 5 | 0.96 | 0.72 | 0.05 |
| Salt9 | 15 | 1.00 | 0.90 | 17 | 1.00 | 0.88 | 9 | 0.91 | 0.86 | 0.01 |
| Salt13 | 6 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 10 | 0.96 | 0.81 | 10 | 0.96 | 0.81 | 0.09 |
| Salt14 | 4 | 0.77 | 0.56 | 6 | 0.98 | 0.77 | 5 | 0.86 | 0.70 | 0.09 |
| Salt16 | 5 | 0.32 | 0.52 | 3 | 0.42 | 0.50 | 3 | 0.21 | 0.31 | 0.48 |
| Salt17 | 7 | 0.93 | 0.78 | 10 | 0.96 | 0.81 | 10 | 0.90 | 0.81 | 0.05 |
| Salt18 | 11 | 1.00 | 0.89 | 9 | 0.96 | 0.84 | 7 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.08 |
| Salt19 | 8 | 0.90 | 0.82 | 10 | 0.92 | 0.87 | 7 | 0.95 | 0.81 | 0.08 |
| Salt21 | 3 | 0.94 | 0.64 | 7 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 6 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.05 |
| Average | 7.38 | 0.83 | 0.73 | 10.13 | 0.93 | 0.80 | 7.56 | 0.88 | 0.76 | 0.09 |
Note: A = number of alleles; He = expected heterozygosity; Ho = gametic heterozygosity; N = sample size; PID = probability of identity.