| Literature DB >> 25202356 |
Shinjiro Kobayashi1, Hiroshi Nakano1, Nobuyuki Ooike2, Masaki Oohashi3, Satoshi Koizumi1, Takehito Otsubo1.
Abstract
An undifferentiated carcinoma with osteoclast-like giant cell tumors (UC-OGC) is a rare type of tumor, which predominantly occurs in the pancreas. Due to the rarity of UC-OGC, sufficient clinical data are not available and its prognosis following surgical resection remains unclear. In the current report the case of a 37-year-old female is presented, in whom an UC-OGC of the pancreas was removed and following this, a second carcinoma of the remnant pancreas was removed during a second surgical procedure. At the patient's initial admission, the preoperative images demonstrated a well-demarcated mass with a marked cystic component at the pancreatic head. The patient underwent a pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy. The final pathological diagnosis was UC-OGC of the pancreas and the tumor was considered to have been curatively resected based on the histopathological findings. Four years after the initial surgery, a small mass was detected in the remnant pancreas and a partial resection of the remnant pancreas was subsequently performed. Histopathologically, the tumor consisted of a poorly differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma. A retrospective pathological analysis showed a segment of a poorly differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma in the initial resected specimen. Therefore, the final diagnosis was considered to be an intra-pancreatic recurrence of UC-OGC. The patient survived 66 months following the initial surgery and 18 months since the second resection. A meta-analysis was performed in the current study by comparing UC-OGC patients who survived more than two years following surgical resection (long-term survivors) with those who succumbed less than one year following surgical resection (short-term survivors). The characteristics of the short-term survivors were patients of an older age, males, and those exhibiting smaller tumors, positive lymph node metastasis, and concomitant components of ductal adenocarcinoma, as well as pleomorphic giant cell carcinoma. The concomitant component of mucinous cystic neoplasm was not considered to be a prognostic factor. To the best of our knowledge, the patient in the current report is the first five-year survivor following a curative second resection.Entities:
Keywords: intra-pancreatic metastasis; long-term survivor; osteoclast-like giant cells; second resection; undifferentiated pancreatic carcinoma
Year: 2014 PMID: 25202356 PMCID: PMC4156164 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2014.2325
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncol Lett ISSN: 1792-1074 Impact factor: 2.967
Figure 1Enhanced abdominal computed tomography on admission demonstrating a tumor containing a cyst-like low-density area and an enhanced septum (arrow).
Figure 2Endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography demonstrating an elliptical filling defect in the main pancreatic duct of the pancreatic body (arrow).
Figure 3Gross findings of the cut surface of the tumor. The tumor was covered with a relatively thick capsule, and internal bleeding and necrosis were observed (arrow).
Figure 4Histopathological features of the tumor. Notable multinucleated giant cells resembling osteoclasts were observed (arrow). (A) The tumor consisted of slightly atypical medium-sized or small round cells and spindle cells. (B) Furthermore, there was a concomitant component of well-differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma.
Figure 5Enhanced abdominal computed tomography conducted four years following the initial surgery revealed a mass (diameter, 2 cm) in the remnant pancreas (arrow).
Figure 6(A) Histopathological findings of the second tumor. (B) The histopathological diagnosis of the second tumor of the remnant pancreas was poorly differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma.
Literature review regarding patients exhibiting undifferentiated carcinoma with osteoclast-like giant cell tumors, who survived for two year or more and those who succumbed within one year following resection.
| A, Short-term survivors | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||||
| Year | First author (ref) | Age, years/Gender | Pancreatic location | Max. diameter, cm | Surgery | Lymph node metastasis | Survival, months | Second surgery | Pathological features |
| 1990 | Lewandrowski ( | 60/M | Tail | 13.0 | DP+S | Negative | 4 | No | PGC |
| 1994 | Martin ( | 57/M | Tail | 7.0 | DP+S | Negative | 4 | Yes | PGC and DAC |
| 1995 | Gatteschi ( | 72/M | Head | 6.0 | PD | Negative | 4 | No | PGC |
| 1997 | Watanabe ( | 76/M | Head | 5.0 | PD | Negative | 3 | No | PGC and DAC |
| 1998 | Molberg ( | 62/F | Head | 6.0 | PD | Nm | 11 | No | Nm |
| 1998 | Molberg ( | 43/F | Tail | 7.0 | DP+S | Nm | 8 | No | Nm |
| 1998 | Molberg ( | 88/F | Tail | 14.0 | DP+S | Nm | 2 | No | Nm |
| 1998 | Molberg ( | 63/M | Head | 5.0 | PD | Nm | 11 | No | Nm |
| 1998 | Molberg ( | 85/F | Head | 3.5 | PD | Nm | 6 | No | Nm |
| 2005 | Nai1 ( | 69/M | Head | 4.7 | PD | Positive | 12 | No | MCN and DAC |
| 2010 | Singhal ( | 42/M | Tail | 14.0 | DP+S | Positive | 4 | No | PGC and DAC |
| 2011 | Hur ( | 77/M | Tail | 10.0 | DP+S | Negative | 3 | No | Nm |
| 2011 | Wada ( | 59/M | Tail | 20.0 | DP+S+TG | Positive | 4 | No | MCN |
|
| |||||||||
| B, Long-term survivors | |||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Year | First author (ref) | Age, years/Gender | Pancreatic location | Max. diameter, cm | Surgery | Lymph node metastasis | Survival, months | Second surgery | Pathological features |
|
| |||||||||
| 1966 | Shamblin ( | 49/M | Head | 8.0 | TP | Negative | 180 | No | Nm |
| 1987 | Baniel ( | 65/F | Tail | 23.0 | DP, distal gastrectomy | Negative | 72 | No | Nm |
| 1993 | Scott ( | 63/M | Head | 24.0 | Local resection | Negative | 24 | Yes | Nm |
| 1993 | Dworak ( | 44/F | Tail | 13.0 | DP | Negative | 40 | Yes | Nm |
| 1998 | Molberg ( | 58/F | Head | 13.0 | PD | Nm | 168 | No | Nm |
| 2001 | Suda ( | 35/F | Tail | 11.0 | DP+S Positive 168 | No | MCC | ||
| 2002 | Shiozawa ( | 45/F | Tail | 4.0 | DP+S | Negative | 30 | No | Nm |
| 2004 | Osaka ( | 57/M | Tail | 20.0 | DP+S+TG | Negative | 36 | No | Nm |
| 2005 | Sedivy ( | 44/F | Tail | 12.0 | DP+S | Negative | 48 | No | MCC |
| 2006 | Lukas ( | 27/M | Head | 22.0 | PD | Negative | 30 | No | PGC |
| 2006 | Lukas ( | 59/F | Head | 8.0 | PD | Negative | 40 | No | PGC |
| 2006 | Sautot-Vial ( | 74/M | Head | 10.0 | PD | Negative | 26 | No | Nm |
| 2009 | Burkadze ( | 34/F | Tail | 11.0 | DP+S | Negative | 48 | No | MCN |
| 2011 | Maksymov ( | 68/F | Head | 2.0 | PD | Negative | 36 | No | PGC |
| 2012 | Present case | 37/F | Head | 4.0 | PpPD | Negative | 66 | Yes | DAC |
M, male; F, female; TP, total pancreatectomy; DP, distal pancreatectomy; PD, pancreaticoduodenectomy; Nm, not mentioned individually; S, splenectomy; TG, total gastrectomy; MCC, mucinous cystadenocarcinoma; PGC, pleomorphic giant cell carcinoma; MCN, mucinous cystic neoplasm; PpPD, pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy; DAC, ductal adenocarcinoma.