Literature DB >> 25202195

Effect of Vibration Frequency on Serratus Anterior Muscle Activity during Performance of the Push-up Plus with a Redcord Sling.

Eui-Ryong Kim1, Jae-Seop Oh2, Won-Gyu Yoo2.   

Abstract

[Purpose] We investigated the effect of vibration at various frequencies on serratus anterior (SA) muscle activity. [Subjects] Ten male subjects were recruited. [Methods] The subjects performed the push-up plus exercise supported by straps above the surface and vertical ropes in the Redcord sling. During the push-up plus, vibrations of 0, 30, 50, or 90 Hz were applied to the Redcord sling using a mechanical vibration apparatus attached to the rope. SA muscle activity was recorded using electromyography.
[Results] SA muscle activity at the 50 Hz vibration frequency was significantly higher than that of no vibration.
[Conclusion] Performing the push-up plus using a Redcord sling with mechanical vibration of 50 Hz effectively increased SA muscle activity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mechanical vibration; Push-up plus; Serratus anterior

Year:  2014        PMID: 25202195      PMCID: PMC4155234          DOI: 10.1589/jpts.26.1275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci        ISSN: 0915-5287


INTRODUCTION

The push-up plus, an axial load exercise, is a closed kinetic chain exercise (CKCE) because the position of the hands on the wall or chair and floor is fixed1,2,3). CKCE to increase activation of the shoulder musculature has been investigated while throwing a baseball3), on unstable and oscillating unstable surfaces2), and using a suspension rope4). The push-up plus strengthens the scapulothoracic musculature, which is critical for smooth motion and stability of the shoulder girdle complex in the efficient movement of the glenohumeral joint1). The serratus anterior (SA) muscle stabilizes the scapula, which is responsible for scapular position and movement1, 2, 4). SA muscle weakness alters scapular movement through insufficient muscle recruitment, which leads to shoulder impingement and pain syndrome2). The SA muscles can be strengthened using a stable surface, such as the floor or hand bar, or an unstable surface, such as a Swiss ball and suspension rope, or an oscillating unstable surface2, 4, 5). Furthermore, exercises performed on an unstable surface have been shown to be more effective at recruiting stabilizing muscles than those performed on a stable surface5, 6). Recently, the Neurac (neuromuscular activation) treatment system, comprising a Redcord sling and mechanical vibration device, was developed to facilitate neuromuscular control of the trunk7) and increase tonic contraction8). We investigated the effect of various vibration frequencies on SA muscle activity during the push-plus performed with a Redcord sling.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

We recruited 10 male volunteers (age, 24.1 ± 3.2 years; weight, 69.3 ± 13.6 kg; height, 173.6 ± 5.3 cm). Exclusion criteria were any history of upper extremity trauma within the last 6 months, previous surgery, cervical spine injury, or continuous pain. Our study was approved by the Inje University Faculty of Health Science Human Ethics Committee, and the subjects provided their written informed consent before participation. A wireless electromyography (EMG) system (TrignoTM Wireless, Delsys, Boston, MA, USA) was used. EMG signals were sampled at 2,000 Hz, amplified, and band-pass filtered (20–450 Hz), and the root mean square (RMS) was calculated. Electrodes were placed on the SA muscle along the midaxillary line on the fifth rib of the participants’ dominant side. Maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) was performed for normalization of the SA muscle. The participants were positioned in the Redcord sling with the straps and vertical rope 10 cm above the surface. Vibration stimuli were applied using a Redcord Stimula (Redcord AS, Staubø, Norway) attached to the vertical ropes above the head of the participant. Prior to commencement of the exercise, the examiner adjusted the vibrator frequency and released the pedal switch on the Redcord Stimula. Participants were then instructed to perform the push-up plus for 5 s (Fig. 1). During the push-up plus exercise, vibration frequencies of 0, 30, 50, and 90 Hz were applied to the Redcord sling using the mechanical vibration apparatus. High force amplitude with low frequency may be dangerous. Type Ia afferents are most sensitive to vibrations at 80–100 Hz, whereas type II afferents are most sensitive to vibrations around 50 Hz9). Thus, we investigated the effect of vibration at 0 (no vibration), 30, 50, and 90 Hz. The push-up plus exercise was performed with the hands placed shoulder-width apart, the elbows fully extended, a straight body alignment, and with the feet placed pelvis-width apart. The participants were instructed to perform maximum scapular protraction and hold it for 5 s. The trial order was randomized across frequencies for each participant, and each trial was repeated five times with a 3-min rest between trials. All statistical analyses were using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), and the effect of the various vibration frequencies on SA muscle activity during the push-up plus exercise were assessed using the repeated measures General Linear Model with the Bonferroni post hoc test. P values <0.05 were deemed to indicate statistical significance.
Fig. 1.

Push-up plus performed with the Redcord sling and Redcord stimuli device

Push-up plus performed with the Redcord sling and Redcord stimuli device

RESULTS

Our results show that SA muscle activity increased significantly during stimulation at 50 Hz (85.6 ± 18.8%) compared with no vibration (64.8 ± 16.7%; p < 0.05). However, SA muscle activities at 30 (76.5 ± 15.6%) and 90 (66.1 ± 17.6%) Hz frequencies were not significantly different from that under the no vibration (64.8 ± 16.7%; p > 0.05) condition.

DISCUSSION

Mechanical vibration applied to the muscle and tendon triggers the tonic vibration reflex, which activates the muscle spindles and evokes the stretch-reflex loop8). Muscular activity that depends on vibration frequency shows a variable EMG response9, 10). The body’s muscular tuning mechanism adjusts mechanical vibration through changes in muscle activity excitatory frequency ranging from 10–65 Hz occurring in the human body. Thus, when the body is exposed to the same vibration frequency, this mechanism is activated to increase muscle activity and minimize resonance10). Di Giminiani et al.9) reported a higher isometric squat EMG response during whole-body vibration at 50 Hz than at 30 Hz. A vibration frequency of 50 Hz stimulated higher muscle activity in the proximal musculature. We found that SA muscle activity was significantly lower during vibration at 90 Hz than at vibrations of 30 and 50 Hz, suggesting that high frequency vibration (>90 Hz) may effectively inhibit or alleviate pain by decreasing muscle activity. Further evidence that our findings were elicited by neural factors affecting muscle activity is that the muscle-tendon unit may increase excitatory inflow, thereby demonstrating an increase in the EMG response. When maximum tension is reached, inhibitory inflow is activated to reduce muscle activity9, 10). Thus, the shape of parabolic indicates a neuromuscular pattern of mechanical vibration9). Four levels of muscle activation have been defined: low (<20% MVIC), moderate (20–40% MVIC), high (41–60% MVIC), and very high (>60% MVIC)11). Our findings indicate that the push-up plus exercise performed using the Redcord system with mechanical vibration at 50 Hz increases SA muscle activity. Thus, we recommend this protocol for effective shoulder and scapula rehabilitation.
  11 in total

1.  Muscle activity damps the soft tissue resonance that occurs in response to pulsed and continuous vibrations.

Authors:  James M Wakeling; Benno M Nigg; Antra I Rozitis
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2002-09

2.  An unstable support surface does not increase scapulothoracic stabilizing muscle activity during push up and push up plus exercises.

Authors:  Gregory J Lehman; Danielle Gilas; Ushma Patel
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2007-07-20

3.  Serratus anterior muscle activation during knee push-up plus exercise performed on static stable, static unstable, and oscillating unstable surfaces in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Si-hyun Kim; Oh-yun Kwon; Su-jung Kim; Kyue-nam Park; Sung-dae Choung; Jong-hyuck Weon
Journal:  Phys Ther Sport       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 2.365

4.  Shoulder muscle activation levels during four closed kinetic chain exercises with and without Redcord slings.

Authors:  Kristof De Mey; Lieven Danneels; Barbara Cagnie; Dorien Borms; Zilke TʼJonck; Eline Van Damme; Ann M Cools
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  An electromyographic analysis of the upper extremity in pitching.

Authors:  N M Digiovine; F W Jobe; M Pink; J Perry
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2009-02-02       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  The interaction between body position and vibration frequency on acute response to whole body vibration.

Authors:  Riccardo Di Giminiani; Francesco Masedu; Jozsef Tihanyi; Renato Scrimaglio; Marco Valenti
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 2.368

7.  Differential effects on tonic and phasic reflex mechanisms produced by vibration of muscles in man.

Authors:  P De Gail; J W Lance; P D Neilson
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1966-02       Impact factor: 10.154

8.  Shoulder kinematics during the wall push-up plus exercise.

Authors:  Jason B Lunden; Jonathan P Braman; Robert F Laprade; Paula M Ludewig
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 3.019

9.  The effect of the neurac sling exercise on postural balance adjustment and muscular response patterns in chronic low back pain patients.

Authors:  Ji Hae Kim; Young Eok Kim; Sea Hyun Bae; Kyung Yoon Kim
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2013-09-20

10.  Surface EMG during the Push-up plus Exercise on a Stable Support or Swiss Ball: Scapular Stabilizer Muscle Exercise.

Authors:  Sung-Hwa Seo; In-Ho Jeon; Yong-Ho Cho; Hyun-Gi Lee; Yoon-Tae Hwang; Jee-Hun Jang
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2013-08-20
View more
  5 in total

1.  Serratus Anterior and Upper Trapezius Electromyographic Analysis of the Push-Up Plus Exercise: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Fu-Jie Kang; Hsiang-Ling Ou; Kun-Ying Lin; Jiu-Jenq Lin
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Effects of the Neurac(®) technique in patients with acute-phase subacromial impingement syndrome.

Authors:  Soo-Yong Kim; Min-Hyeok Kang; Dong-Kyu Lee; Jae-Seop Oh
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-05-26

3.  The effects of exercise type and elbow angle on vertical ground reaction force and muscle activity during a push-up plus exercise.

Authors:  Jun G San Juan; David N Suprak; Sean M Roach; Marc Lyda
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  The effects of wall slide and sling slide exercises on scapular alignment and pain in subjects with scapular downward rotation.

Authors:  Tae-Ho Kim; Jin-Yong Lim
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2016-09-29

5.  Muscle activity of Bulgarian squat. Effects of additional vibration, suspension and unstable surface.

Authors:  Joan Aguilera-Castells; Bernat Buscà; Jose Morales; Mònica Solana-Tramunt; Azahara Fort-Vanmeerhaeghe; Fernando Rey-Abella; Jaume Bantulà; Javier Peña
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.