Lotten Darlin1, Christer Borgfeldt2, Emelie Widén2, Päivi Kannisto2. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Skane University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden Lotten.Darlin@med.lu.se. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Skane University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Abstract
AIM: To analyze the cervical screening history in women with cervical cancer and their outcome. DESIGN: All women diagnosed with cervical cancer between January 2009 and December 2010 in the South Sweden region were included in the audit. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cervical cancer was registered in 165 women in 2009 and 2010. Their screening history was analyzed, and was classified as normal or imperfect. The method of discovering the cancer was either by symptoms or by screening. The main outcome measured was overall survival in cervical cancer related to cervical screening history. RESULTS: Women above 65 years of age were more frequently diagnosed with advanced-stage disease (The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics II-IV) (n=36 out of 43; 84%) compared to women below 65 years of age (n=35 out of 122; 29%) (p<0.001). All patients diagnosed by the cervical screening program were still alive (30/30) at the median follow-up time (36 months), showing better overall survival compared to women below screening age in whom cancer was discovered due to symptoms (68/98; p<0.001). Cox proportional hazards model showed that women beyond screening age (>65 years old) with normal screening history had a worse prognosis, with a hazard ratio of 4.8 (95% confidence interval=1.9-12.1, p=0.001), and women (>65 years old) who had not followed the screening program had a hazard ratio of 5.9 (95% confidence interval I 2.4-14.6, p<0.001), compared to women under 65 years old who had followed the screening program. CONCLUSION: Cervical cancer in women above the age of 65 years is discovered at advanced stages of the disease and their prognosis is poor. Copyright
AIM: To analyze the cervical screening history in women with cervical cancer and their outcome. DESIGN: All women diagnosed with cervical cancer between January 2009 and December 2010 in the South Sweden region were included in the audit. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Cervical cancer was registered in 165 women in 2009 and 2010. Their screening history was analyzed, and was classified as normal or imperfect. The method of discovering the cancer was either by symptoms or by screening. The main outcome measured was overall survival in cervical cancer related to cervical screening history. RESULTS:Women above 65 years of age were more frequently diagnosed with advanced-stage disease (The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics II-IV) (n=36 out of 43; 84%) compared to women below 65 years of age (n=35 out of 122; 29%) (p<0.001). All patients diagnosed by the cervical screening program were still alive (30/30) at the median follow-up time (36 months), showing better overall survival compared to women below screening age in whom cancer was discovered due to symptoms (68/98; p<0.001). Cox proportional hazards model showed that women beyond screening age (>65 years old) with normal screening history had a worse prognosis, with a hazard ratio of 4.8 (95% confidence interval=1.9-12.1, p=0.001), and women (>65 years old) who had not followed the screening program had a hazard ratio of 5.9 (95% confidence interval I 2.4-14.6, p<0.001), compared to women under 65 years old who had followed the screening program. CONCLUSION:Cervical cancer in women above the age of 65 years is discovered at advanced stages of the disease and their prognosis is poor. Copyright
Authors: Andrzej Nowakowski; Marek Cybulski; Irmina Buda; Iwona Janosz; Katarzyna Olszak-Wąsik; Piotr Bodzek; Andrzej Śliwczyński; Zbigniew Teter; Anita Olejek; Włodzimierz Baranowski Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-05-19 Impact factor: 3.240