Literature DB >> 25201663

A comparison of hospital administrative costs in eight nations: US costs exceed all others by far.

David U Himmelstein1, Miraya Jun2, Reinhard Busse3, Karine Chevreul4, Alexander Geissler5, Patrick Jeurissen6, Sarah Thomson7, Marie-Amelie Vinet8, Steffie Woolhandler9.   

Abstract

A few studies have noted the outsize administrative costs of US hospitals, but no research has compared these costs across multiple nations with various types of health care systems. We assembled a team of international health policy experts to conduct just such a challenging analysis of hospital administrative costs across eight nations: Canada, England, Scotland, Wales, France, Germany, the Netherlands, and the United States. We found that administrative costs accounted for 25.3 percent of total US hospital expenditures--a percentage that is increasing. Next highest were the Netherlands (19.8 percent) and England (15.5 percent), both of which are transitioning to market-oriented payment systems. Scotland and Canada, whose single-payer systems pay hospitals global operating budgets, with separate grants for capital, had the lowest administrative costs. Costs were intermediate in France and Germany (which bill per patient but pay separately for capital projects) and in Wales. Reducing US per capita spending for hospital administration to Scottish or Canadian levels would have saved more than $150 billion in 2011. This study suggests that the reduction of US administrative costs would best be accomplished through the use of a simpler and less market-oriented payment scheme. Project HOPE—The People-to-People Health Foundation, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cost of Health Care; Developed World < International/global health studies; Financing Health Care; Health Economics; Hospitals

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25201663     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.1327

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  28 in total

1.  Measuring, Reporting, and Rewarding Quality of Care in 5 Nations: 5 Policy Levers to Enhance Hospital Quality Accountability.

Authors:  Christoph Pross; Alexander Geissler; Reinhard Busse
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.911

Review 2.  What is Single-Payer Health Care? A Review of Definitions and Proposals in the U.S.

Authors:  Jodi L Liu; Robert H Brook
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  The Growing Executive-Physician Wage Gap in Major US Nonprofit Hospitals and Burden of Nonclinical Workers on the US Healthcare System.

Authors:  Jerry Y Du; Alexander S Rascoe; Randall E Marcus
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Drug Company Compensated Physicians Role in Causing America's Deadly Opioid Epidemic: When Will We Learn?

Authors:  Arthur H Gale
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug

5.  The Hospital as a Factory and the Physician as an Assembly Line Worker.

Authors:  Arthur H Gale
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb

6.  Waitzkin Responds.

Authors:  Howard Waitzkin
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 7.  Devolution and health in the UK: policy and its lessons since 1998.

Authors:  Scott L Greer
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 4.291

8.  It Is Time to Liberate Hospitals from Profit-Centered Care.

Authors:  Sidney M Wolfe; Steffie Woolhandler; David U Himmelstein
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Administrative Costs Associated With Physician Billing and Insurance-Related Activities at an Academic Health Care System.

Authors:  Phillip Tseng; Robert S Kaplan; Barak D Richman; Mahek A Shah; Kevin A Schulman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  California Universal Health Care Bill: an economic stimulus and life-saving proposal.

Authors:  Alison P Galvani; David P Durham; Sten H Vermund; Meagan C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2017-09-17       Impact factor: 79.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.