Literature DB >> 25201500

Lymph node metastases in patients undergoing surgery for a gallbladder cancer. Extension of the lymph node dissection and prognostic value of the lymph node ratio.

David Jérémie Birnbaum1, Luca Viganò, Nadia Russolillo, Serena Langella, Alessandro Ferrero, Lorenzo Capussotti.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lymph node (LN) status is one of the strongest prognostic factors after gallbladder cancer (GBC) resection. The adequate extension of LN dissection and the stratification of the prognosis in N+ patients have been debated. The present study aims to clarify these issues.
METHODS: A total of 112 consecutive patients who underwent operations for GBC with LN dissection were analyzed. Twenty-five patients (22.3%) had D1 dissection (hepatic pedicle), and 87 (77.7%) had D2 dissection (hepatic pedicle, celiac and retro-pancreatic area). The LN ratio (LNR) was computed as follows: number of metastatic LNs/number of retrieved LNs.
RESULTS: The median number of retrieved LNs was 7 (1-35). Fifty-nine patients (52.7%) had LN metastases (22 N2). D2 dissection allowed the retrieval of more LNs (8 vs. 3, p = 0.0007), with similar short-term outcomes. Common bile duct (CBD) resection (n = 41) did not increase the number of retrieved LNs. In five patients, D2 dissection identified skip LN metastases that otherwise would have been missed. LN metastases negatively impacted survival (5-years survival 57.2% if N0 vs. 12.4% if N+, p < 0.0001), but N1 and N2 patients had similar survival rates. The number of LN+ (1-3 vs. ≥4) did not impact prognosis. An LNR = 0.15 stratified the prognosis of N+ patients: 5-years survival 32.7% if LNR ≤ 0.15 vs. 10.3% if LNR > 0.15 (multivariate analysis p = 0.007).
CONCLUSIONS: A D2 LN dissection is recommended in all patients, because it allows for better staging. CBD resection does not improve LN dissection. An LNR = 0.15, not the site of metastatic LNs, stratified the prognoses of N+ patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25201500     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-4044-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  20 in total

1.  Validation of the prognostic performance in various nodal staging systems for gallbladder cancer: results of a multicenter study.

Authors:  Woohyung Lee; Chi-Young Jeong; Young Hoon Kim; Young Hoon Roh; Myung Hee Yoon; Hyung Il Seo; Jeong-Ik Park; Bo-Hyun Jung; Dong Hoon Shin; Young Il Choi; Je Ho Ryu; Kwang Ho Yang; Chang Soo Choi; Yo-Han Park; Yang Won Nah; Soon-Chan Hong
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Extended Lymphadenectomy Is Required for Incidental Gallbladder Cancer Independent of Cystic Duct Lymph Node Status.

Authors:  Eduardo A Vega; Eduardo Vinuela; Suguru Yamashita; Marcel Sanhueza; Gabriel Cavada; Cristian Diaz; Thomas A Aloia; Yun Shin Chun; Ching-Wei D Tzeng; Masayuki Okuno; Claire Goumard; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Jeffrey E Lee; Claudius Conrad
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Prognostic Implications of Lymph Node Status for Patients With Gallbladder Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Study.

Authors:  Neda Amini; Yuhree Kim; Ana Wilson; Georgios Antonios Margonis; Cecilia G Ethun; George Poultsides; Thuy Tran; Kamran Idrees; Chelsea A Isom; Ryan C Fields; Bradley Krasnick; Sharon M Weber; Ahmed Salem; Robert C G Martin; Charles Scoggins; Perry Shen; Harveshp D Mogal; Carl Schmidt; Eliza Beal; Ioannis Hatzaras; Rivfka Shenoy; Shishir K Maithel; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping of Liver.

Authors:  Hideyuki Wada; Hoon Hyun; Christina Vargas; Elizabeth M Genega; Julien Gravier; Sylvain Gioux; John V Frangioni; Hak Soo Choi
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Prognostic significance of lymph node ratio in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Nana Wang; Yibin Jia; Jianbo Wang; Xintong Wang; Cihang Bao; Qingxu Song; Bingxu Tan; Yufeng Cheng
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-11-21

6.  Long-Term Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Advanced Gallbladder Cancer: Focus on the Advanced T Stage.

Authors:  Chen Chen; Zhimin Geng; Haoxin Shen; Huwei Song; Yaling Zhao; Guanjun Zhang; Wenzhi Li; Li Ma; Lin Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A new nomogram from the SEER database for predicting the prognosis of gallbladder cancer patients after surgery.

Authors:  Zunqiang Xiao; Zhan Shi; Linjun Hu; Yuling Gao; Junjun Zhao; Yang Liu; Qiuran Xu; Dongsheng Huang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-12

8.  External validation of the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for gall bladder carcinoma.

Authors:  Hani Oweira; Arianeb Mehrabi; Anwar Giryes; Aysun Tekbas; Omar Abdel-Rahman
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2018-12

9.  Prognostic significance of metastatic lymph node ratio in squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix.

Authors:  Chen Li; Wenhui Liu; Yufeng Cheng
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Metastatic lymph node ratio demonstrates better prognostic stratification than pN staging in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after esophagectomy.

Authors:  Hongdian Zhang; Huagang Liang; Yongyin Gao; Xiaobin Shang; Lei Gong; Zhao Ma; Ke Sun; Peng Tang; Zhentao Yu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.