Literature DB >> 25201487

Concentration of gynaecology and obstetrics in Germany: is comprehensive access at stake?

Roman Mennicken1, Ingo W K Kolodziej2, Boris Augurzky3, Rolf Kreienberg4.   

Abstract

Financial soundness will become more and more difficult in the future for all types of hospitals. This is particularly relevant for gynaecology and obstetrics departments: while some disciplines can expect higher demand due to demographic changes and progress in medicine and medical technology, the inpatient sector for gynaecology and obstetrics is likely to lose patients in line with these trends. In this paper we estimate future demand for gynaecology and obstetrics in Germany and develop a cost model to calculate the average profitability in this discipline. The number of inpatient cases in gynaecology and obstetrics can be expected to decrease by 3.62% between 2007 and 2020 due to the demographic change and a potential shift from inpatient to outpatient services. Small departments within the fields of gynaecology and obstetrics are already incurring heavy losses, and the anticipated decline in cases should increase this financial distress even more. As such, the further centralisation of services is indicated. We calculate travel times for gynaecology and obstetrics patients and estimate the anticipated changes in travel times by simulating different scenarios for this centralisation process. Our results show that the centralisation of hospital services in gynaecology and obstetrics may be possible without compromising comprehensive access as measured by travel times.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Centralisation of hospital services; Comprehensive access to hospital services; Demographic change

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25201487     DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.07.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  4 in total

1.  The causal effect of delivery volume on severe maternal morbidity: an instrumental variable analysis in Sichuan, China.

Authors:  Nan Chen; Jay Pan
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2022-05

2.  The Volume-Outcome Relationship Revisited: Practice Indeed Makes Perfect.

Authors:  Corinna Hentschker; Roman Mennicken
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Orthopedic workforce planning in Germany - an analysis of orthopedic accessibility.

Authors:  Jan Bauer; Peter Müller; Werner Maier; David A Groneberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Accessibility of general and specialized obstetric care providers in Germany and England: an analysis of location and neonatal outcome.

Authors:  Jan Bauer; David A Groneberg; Werner Maier; Roxanne Manek; Frank Louwen; Dörthe Brüggmann
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 3.918

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.