Literature DB >> 25201358

Oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin versus fluorouracil and leucovorin as adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (ADORE): an open-label, multicentre, phase 2, randomised controlled trial.

Yong Sang Hong1, Byung-Ho Nam2, Kyu-Pyo Kim1, Jeong Eun Kim1, Seong Joon Park1, Young Suk Park3, Joon Oh Park3, Sun Young Kim4, Tae-You Kim5, Jee Hyun Kim6, Joong Bae Ahn7, Seok-Byung Lim8, Chang Sik Yu8, Jin Cheon Kim8, Seong Hyeon Yun9, Jong Hoon Kim10, Jin-Hong Park10, Hee Chul Park11, Kyung Hae Jung1, Tae Won Kim12.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The role of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with rectal cancer is controversial, especially when used after preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Fluoropyrimidine-based adjuvant chemotherapy, including fluorouracil and leucovorin, has been widely used; however, the addition of oxaliplatin to fluorouracil and leucovorin (FOLFOX), a standard adjuvant regimen for colon cancer, has not been tested in rectal cancer. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of adjuvant fluorouracil and leucovorin with that of FOLFOX in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy.
METHODS: In this open-label, multicentre, phase 2, randomised trial, patients with postoperative pathological stage II (ypT3-4N0) or III (ypTanyN1-2) rectal cancer after preoperative fluoropyrimidine-based chemoradiotherapy and total mesorectal excision were recruited and randomly assigned (1:1) via a web-based software platform to receive adjuvant chemotherapy with either four cycles of fluorouracil and leucovorin (fluorouracil 380 mg/m(2) and leucovorin 20 mg/m(2) on days 1-5, every 4 weeks) or eight cycles of FOLFOX (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2), leucovorin 200 mg/m(2), and fluorouracil bolus 400 mg/m(2) on day 1, and fluorouracil infusion 2400 mg/m(2) for 46 h, every 2 weeks). Stratification factors were pathological stage (II vs III) and centre. Neither patients nor investigators were masked to group assignment. The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival, analysed by intention to treat. This study is fully enrolled, is in long-term follow-up, and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00807911.
FINDINGS: Between Nov 19, 2008, and June 12, 2012, 321 patients were randomly assigned to fluorouracil and leucovorin (n=161) and FOLFOX (n=160). 141 (95%) of 149 patients in the fluorouracil plus leucovorin group and 141 (97%) of 146 in the FOLFOX group completed all planned cycles of adjuvant treatment. Median follow-up was 38·2 months (IQR 26·4-50·6). 3-year disease-free survival was 71·6% (95% CI 64·6-78·6) in the FOLFOX group and 62·9% (55·4-70·4) in the fluorouracil plus leucovorin group (hazard ratio 0·657, 95% CI 0·434-0·994; p=0·047). Any grade neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, fatigue, nausea, and sensory neuropathy were significantly more common in the FOLFOX group than in the fluorouracil plus leucovorin group; however, we noted no significant difference in the frequency of these events at grade 3 or 4. The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were neutropenia (38 [26%] of 149 patients in the fluorouracil plus leucovorin group vs 52 [36%] of 146 patients in the FOLFOX group), leucopenia (eight [5%] vs 12 [8%]), febrile neutropenia (four [3%] vs one [<1%]), diarrhoea (four [3%] vs two [1%]), and nausea (one [<1%] vs two [1%]).
INTERPRETATION: Adjuvant FOLFOX improves disease-free survival compared with fluorouracil plus leucovorin in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy and total mesorectal excision, and warrants further investigation. FUNDING: Korea Healthcare Technology R&D Project (South Korean Ministry of Health and Welfare).
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25201358     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70377-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  102 in total

Review 1.  Adjuvant chemotherapy for rectal cancer: Is it needed?

Authors:  Kristijonas Milinis; Michael Thornton; Amir Montazeri; Paul S Rooney
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-12-10

2.  Consensus statement: the 16th Annual Western Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference; Saskatoon, Saskatchewan; September 5-6, 2014.

Authors:  S Ahmed; O Bathe; S Berry; D Buie; J Davies; C Doll; S Dowden; S Gill; V Gordon; P Hebbard; E Jones; H Kennecke; S Koski; M Krahn; D Le; H Lim; C Lund; Y Luo; A Mcffadden; J Mcghie; K Mulder; J Park; F Rashidi; A Sami; K T Tan; R Wong
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 3.  Neoadjuvant Strategies: Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Shahab Ahmed; Cathy Eng
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-11-27

4.  Bone marrow tolerance during postoperative chemotherapy in colorectal carcinomas.

Authors:  Neil B Newman; Rebecca A Moss; Nell Maloney-Patel; Kristen Donohue; Teresa V Brown; Michael J Nissenblatt; Shou-En Lu; Salma K Jabbour
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-06

5.  [Not Available].

Authors:  J Reibetanz; C T Germer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  Thermosensitive Hydrogel Co-loaded with Gold Nanoparticles and Doxorubicin for Effective Chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Tingting Li; Mingfu Zhang; Jianzhen Wang; Tianqi Wang; Yao Yao; Xiaomei Zhang; Cai Zhang; Na Zhang
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 4.009

7.  Hemoglobin level and XRCC1 polymorphisms to select patients with locally advanced rectal cancer candidate for neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with concurrent capecitabine and a platinum salt.

Authors:  Vincenzo Formica; Michaela Benassi; Giovanna Del Vecchio Blanco; Elena Doldo; Laura Martano; Ilaria Portarena; Antonella Nardecchia; Jessica Lucchetti; Cristina Morelli; Emilia Giudice; Piero Rossi; Alessandro Anselmo; Pierpaolo Sileri; Giuseppe Sica; Augusto Orlandi; Riccardo Santoni; Mario Roselli
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 8.  Controversies in the multimodality management of locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Robert Díaz Beveridge; Dilara Akhoundova; Gema Bruixola; Jorge Aparicio
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 9.  Advances and challenges in treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  J Joshua Smith; Julio Garcia-Aguilar
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Contemporary management of locally advanced rectal cancer: Resolving issues, controversies and shifting paradigms.

Authors:  Aeris Jane D Nacion; Youn Young Park; Nam Kyu Kim
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 5.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.