Julie Woods1, Alex Bressan2, Corrina Langelaan3, Angela Mallon3, Claire Palermo2. 1. School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, Vic. 3125, Australia. 2. Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Monash University, Level 1, 264 Ferntree Gully Road, Notting Hill, Vic. 3168, Australia. 3. The Parents' Jury, 570 Elizabeth Street, Melbourne, Vic. 3000, Australia.
Abstract
ISSUE ADDRESSED: Since 2005, all states and territories across Australia have progressively introduced policy guidelines to promote nutritious food sales in school canteens. This study aimed to assess the compliance of school canteens with their state or territory canteen guidelines. METHODS: School canteen menus from a convenience sample of online government school websites were assessed for compliance with guidelines for the inclusion of foods meeting the criteria for 'red' ('not recommended' or 'only occasional - no more than twice per term'), 'amber' ('select carefully') and 'green' ('always on the menu', 'everyday', 'fill the menu' or 'plenty'). The costs of a salad and a regular pie were also collected where present. RESULTS: A total of 263 school menus were sourced and assessed (4% of government schools). Western Australia was the most compliant, with 62% of menus adhering to the state guidelines; compliance in other jurisdictions ranged from 5-35%. Compared with primary schools, a higher proportion of secondary schools offered 'red' items on the menu (P<0.05). The mean cost of a regular pie (A$3.17 ± 0.51) was significantly cheaper than the cost of a salad (A$4.2 5 ± 0.82) (P<0.001). A range of discretionary food items were present on a large proportion of menus. CONCLUSION: This study found that the majority of school canteens were not complying with relevant state or territory guidelines, particularly those schools in which no monitoring or enforcement of the guidelines was conducted. SO WHAT? Monitoring and enforcement by those responsible for the policy, together with efforts to build the capacity for schools and manufacturers to improve the food supply, may increase compliance.
ISSUE ADDRESSED: Since 2005, all states and territories across Australia have progressively introduced policy guidelines to promote nutritious food sales in school canteens. This study aimed to assess the compliance of school canteens with their state or territory canteen guidelines. METHODS: School canteen menus from a convenience sample of online government school websites were assessed for compliance with guidelines for the inclusion of foods meeting the criteria for 'red' ('not recommended' or 'only occasional - no more than twice per term'), 'amber' ('select carefully') and 'green' ('always on the menu', 'everyday', 'fill the menu' or 'plenty'). The costs of a salad and a regular pie were also collected where present. RESULTS: A total of 263 school menus were sourced and assessed (4% of government schools). Western Australia was the most compliant, with 62% of menus adhering to the state guidelines; compliance in other jurisdictions ranged from 5-35%. Compared with primary schools, a higher proportion of secondary schools offered 'red' items on the menu (P<0.05). The mean cost of a regular pie (A$3.17 ± 0.51) was significantly cheaper than the cost of a salad (A$4.2 5 ± 0.82) (P<0.001). A range of discretionary food items were present on a large proportion of menus. CONCLUSION: This study found that the majority of school canteens were not complying with relevant state or territory guidelines, particularly those schools in which no monitoring or enforcement of the guidelines was conducted. SO WHAT? Monitoring and enforcement by those responsible for the policy, together with efforts to build the capacity for schools and manufacturers to improve the food supply, may increase compliance.
Authors: Sze Lin Yoong; Nicole Nathan; Luke Wolfenden; John Wiggers; Kathryn Reilly; Christopher Oldmeadow; Rebecca Wyse; Rachel Sutherland; Tessa Delaney; Peter Butler; Lisa Janssen; Sarah Preece; Christopher M Williams Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2016-12-05 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Luke Wolfenden; Nicole Nathan; Lisa M Janssen; John Wiggers; Kathryn Reilly; Tessa Delaney; Christopher M Williams; Colin Bell; Rebecca Wyse; Rachel Sutherland; Libby Campbell; Christophe Lecathelinais; Chris Oldmeadow; Megan Freund; Sze Lin Yoong Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2017-01-11 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Erica Reeve; Anne Marie Thow; Colin Bell; Katrin Engelhardt; Ella Cecilia Gamolo-Naliponguit; John Juliard Go; Gary Sacks Journal: Global Health Date: 2018-01-23 Impact factor: 4.185
Authors: Patricia Jane Lucas; Emma Patterson; Gary Sacks; Natassja Billich; Charlotte Elizabeth Louise Evans Journal: Nutrients Date: 2017-07-11 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Emalie Rosewarne; Annet C Hoek; Gary Sacks; Luke Wolfenden; Jason Wu; Jenny Reimers; Kirstan Corben; Michael Moore; Cliona Ni Mhurchu; Jacqui Webster Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2020-06-30 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Kathryn L Reilly; Penny Reeves; Simon Deeming; Sze Lin Yoong; Luke Wolfenden; Nicole Nathan; John Wiggers Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2018-03-20 Impact factor: 3.295