BACKGROUND: We studied the incidence and dose-response relationship of radioepidermitis in parotid gland carcinoma patients treated with [(125)I] seed brachytherapy in the hopes of designing an optimized pre-implant treatment plan that would reduce the incidence and severity of radioepidermitis in patients receiving this therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2007 and May 2010, 100 parotid gland cancer patients were treated postoperatively with [(125)I] seed brachytherapy. The matched peripheral dose (MPD) was 80-140 Gy, and [(125)I] seed activity was 0.7-0.8 mCi. The mean dose delivered to the skin was calculated in the post-implant CT on day 0 following implantation. Grades of acute and late dermatitis were evaluated at 2, 6, 12, and 18 months post-implantation. RESULTS: Most patients experienced grade 0-2 acute and late skin side effects (86 and 97%, respectively), though a small subset developed severe complications. Most grade 1-3 effects resolved within 6 months of implantation, though some grade 1-3 effects and all grade 4 effects remained unchanged throughout the 18-month follow-up period. Grade 3 and 4 effects were most prominent (75 and 25%, respectively) with doses of 110-140 Gy; doses higher than 140 Gy produced only grade 4 effects. CONCLUSION: [(125)I] seed brachytherapy produced acceptable levels of acute and late radioepidermitis with a good clinical outcome. A mean dose under 100 Gy delivered to the skin was safe, though doses of 110-140 Gy should be given with caution and extra monitoring; doses greater than 140 Gy are dangerous and likely to produce grade 4-5 effects.
BACKGROUND: We studied the incidence and dose-response relationship of radioepidermitis in parotid gland carcinomapatients treated with [(125)I] seed brachytherapy in the hopes of designing an optimized pre-implant treatment plan that would reduce the incidence and severity of radioepidermitis in patients receiving this therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2007 and May 2010, 100 parotid gland cancerpatients were treated postoperatively with [(125)I] seed brachytherapy. The matched peripheral dose (MPD) was 80-140 Gy, and [(125)I] seed activity was 0.7-0.8 mCi. The mean dose delivered to the skin was calculated in the post-implant CT on day 0 following implantation. Grades of acute and late dermatitis were evaluated at 2, 6, 12, and 18 months post-implantation. RESULTS: Most patients experienced grade 0-2 acute and late skin side effects (86 and 97%, respectively), though a small subset developed severe complications. Most grade 1-3 effects resolved within 6 months of implantation, though some grade 1-3 effects and all grade 4 effects remained unchanged throughout the 18-month follow-up period. Grade 3 and 4 effects were most prominent (75 and 25%, respectively) with doses of 110-140 Gy; doses higher than 140 Gy produced only grade 4 effects. CONCLUSION: [(125)I] seed brachytherapy produced acceptable levels of acute and late radioepidermitis with a good clinical outcome. A mean dose under 100 Gy delivered to the skin was safe, though doses of 110-140 Gy should be given with caution and extra monitoring; doses greater than 140 Gy are dangerous and likely to produce grade 4-5 effects.
Authors: Volker Budach; Martin Stuschke; Wilfried Budach; Michael Baumann; Dirk Geismar; Gerhard Grabenbauer; Ingrid Lammert; Klaus Jahnke; Georg Stueben; Thomas Herrmann; Michael Bamberg; Peter Wust; Wolfgang Hinkelbein; Klaus-Dieter Wernecke Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-02-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: T G Wendt; G G Grabenbauer; C M Rödel; H J Thiel; H Aydin; R Rohloff; T P Wustrow; H Iro; C Popella; A Schalhorn Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1998-04 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jean Bourhis; Michel Lapeyre; Jacques Tortochaux; Michel Rives; Mehdi Aghili; Sylvain Bourdin; François Lesaunier; Toufik Benassi; Claire Lemanski; Lionel Geoffrois; Antoine Lusinchi; Pierre Verrelle; Etienne Bardet; Morbize Julieron; Pierre Wibault; Monique Luboinski; Ellen Benhamou Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-06-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: K K Fu; T F Pajak; A Trotti; C U Jones; S A Spencer; T L Phillips; A S Garden; J A Ridge; J S Cooper; K K Ang Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2000-08-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Yu L Jiang; Na Meng; Jun J Wang; Ping Jiang; Hui Sh Yuan; Chen Liu; Ang Qu; Rui J Yang Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2010-07-30 Impact factor: 3.481