Literature DB >> 25199996

Selecting cost-effective areas for restoration of ecosystem services.

M F Adame1, V Hermoso, K Perhans, C E Lovelock, J A Herrera-Silveira.   

Abstract

Selection of areas for restoration should be based on cost-effectiveness analysis to attain the maximum benefit with a limited budget and overcome the traditional ad hoc allocation of funds for restoration projects. Restoration projects need to be planned on the basis of ecological knowledge and economic and social constraints. We devised a novel approach for selecting cost-effective areas for restoration on the basis of biodiversity and potential provision of 3 ecosystem services: carbon storage, water depuration, and coastal protection. We used Marxan, a spatial prioritization tool, to balance the provision of ecosystem services against the cost of restoration. We tested this approach in a mangrove ecosystem in the Caribbean. Our approach efficiently selected restoration areas that at low cost were compatible with biodiversity targets and that maximized the provision of one or more ecosystem services. Choosing areas for restoration of mangroves on the basis carbon storage potential, largely guaranteed the restoration of biodiversity and other ecosystem services.
© 2014 Society for Conservation Biology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Marxan; bonos de carbono; calidad del agua; carbon stocks; humedales; huracanes; hurricanes; manglares; mangroves; rehabilitación; rehabilitation; water quality; wetlands

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25199996     DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12391

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  3 in total

1.  Toward sustainable environmental quality: Priority research questions for Europe.

Authors:  Paul J Van den Brink; Alistair B A Boxall; Lorraine Maltby; Bryan W Brooks; Murray A Rudd; Thomas Backhaus; David Spurgeon; Violaine Verougstraete; Charmaine Ajao; Gerald T Ankley; Sabine E Apitz; Kathryn Arnold; Tomas Brodin; Miguel Cañedo-Argüelles; Jennifer Chapman; Jone Corrales; Marie-Agnès Coutellec; Teresa F Fernandes; Jerker Fick; Alex T Ford; Gemma Giménez Papiol; Ksenia J Groh; Thomas H Hutchinson; Hank Kruger; Jussi V K Kukkonen; Stefania Loutseti; Stuart Marshall; Derek Muir; Manuel E Ortiz-Santaliestra; Kai B Paul; Andreu Rico; Ismael Rodea-Palomares; Jörg Römbke; Tomas Rydberg; Helmut Segner; Mathijs Smit; Cornelis A M van Gestel; Marco Vighi; Inge Werner; Elke I Zimmer; Joke van Wensem
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 3.742

2.  Analyzing ecological restoration strategies for water and soil conservation.

Authors:  Sandra Isay Saad; Jonathan Mota da Silva; Marx Leandro Naves Silva; João Luis Bittencourt Guimarães; Wilson Cabral Sousa Júnior; Ricardo de Oliveira Figueiredo; Humberto Ribeiro da Rocha
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Public support for restoration: Does including ecosystem services as a goal engage a different set of values and attitudes than biodiversity protection alone?

Authors:  Virginia Matzek; Kerrie A Wilson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.