Literature DB >> 25199947

Defining perioperative risk after hepatectomy based on diagnosis and extent of resection.

Christopher R Shubert1, Elizabeth B Habermann, Mark J Truty, Kristine M Thomsen, Michael L Kendrick, David M Nagorney.   

Abstract

Outcomes after hepatectomy have been assessed incompletely and have not been stratified by both extent of resection and diagnosis. We hypothesized that operative risk is better assessed by stratifying diagnoses into low- and high-risk categories and extent of resection into major and minor resection categories to more accurately evaluate the outcomes after hepatectomy. ACS-NSQIP was reviewed for 30-day operative mortality and major morbidity after partial hepatectomy (PH), left hepatectomy (LH), right hepatectomy (RH), and trisectionectomy (TS). Mortality was reviewed per diagnosis. "High Risk" was defined as the diagnoses associated with the greatest mortality. Major and minor resections were defined by comparison of outcomes for extent of resection by univariate analysis. Chi-square tests, t tests, Fisher's exact tests, and multivariable logistic regression were utilized to compare the outcomes across groups. Among the 7,043 patients, the greatest mortality was observed with hepatocellular carcinoma (5.2%) and cholangiocarcinoma (8.2%), either intra- or extrahepatic, which were classified "High Risk". Metastatic disease, benign neoplasms, and gallbladder cancer had a mortality rate of 1.3, 0.5, and 1.0%, respectively, and were classified "Low Risk". PH and LH were similar statistically for operative mortality and major morbidity within respective diagnosis risk groups (Low Risk: PH vs. LH and High Risk: PH vs. LH; all p > 0.05) and were defined as "Minor Resections". Similarly, RH and TS had similar operative mortality and major morbidity within respective diagnosis risk groups (Low Risk: RH vs. TS and High Risk: RH vs. TS; all p > 0.05) and were defined as "Major Resections". Risks of major morbidity and mortality increased for both diagnoses and the extent of resection. With minor resections, mortality and major morbidity were 5 and 1.6 times greater respectively for high-risk diagnosis than for low-risk diagnosis. With major resections, mortality and major morbidity were 4 and 1.6 times greater, respectively, for high-risk diagnoses than low-risk diagnoses. With low-risk diagnoses, mortality and major morbidity were 2.9 and 1.7 times greater, respectively, for major resections than minor resections (p < 0.001). With high-risk diagnoses, mortality and major morbidity were 2.3 and 1.7 times greater, respectively, for major resections than minor resections (all p < 0.001). Regardless of the extent of resection, high-risk diagnoses were independently associated with mortality (OR = 3.2 and 3.1, respectively) and major morbidity (OR = 1.5 and 1.5, respectively). Risk of hepatectomy is better assessed when stratified by both the diagnostic risk and the extent of resection. Accurate assessment of these outcomes has significant implications for preoperative planning, informed consent, resource utilization, and inter-institutional comparisons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25199947     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-014-2634-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  41 in total

1.  Surgical management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: the Nagoya experience.

Authors:  Hideki Nishio; Masato Nagino; Yuji Nimura
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.647

2.  A new look on liver anatomy: needs and means to go beyond the Couinaud scheme.

Authors:  Henri Bismuth
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 25.083

Review 3.  Revisiting liver anatomy and terminology of hepatectomies.

Authors:  Henri Bismuth
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Liver hemangioma revisited: current surgical indications, technical aspects, results.

Authors:  I Popescu; S Ciurea; V Brasoveanu; D Hrehoret; P Boeti; S Georgescu; D Tulbure
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2001 May-Jun

5.  Survival after hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: trends in outcomes for 1,600 patients during two decades at a single institution.

Authors:  Michael G House; Hiromichi Ito; Mithat Gönen; Yuman Fong; Peter J Allen; Ronald P DeMatteo; Murray F Brennan; Leslie H Blumgart; William R Jarnagin; Michael I D'Angelica
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  Management of giant hemangioma of the liver: resection versus observation.

Authors:  Thomas Schnelldorfer; Adam L Ware; Rory Smoot; Cathy D Schleck; William S Harmsen; David M Nagorney
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Aggressive preoperative management and extended surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: Nagoya experience.

Authors:  Y Nimura; J Kamiya; S Kondo; M Nagino; K Uesaka; K Oda; T Sano; H Yamamoto; N Hayakawa
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2000

8.  Improved outcome of resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (Klatskin tumor).

Authors:  Sander Dinant; Michael F Gerhards; E A J Rauws; Olivier R C Busch; Dirk J Gouma; Thomas M van Gulik
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2006-04-14       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: prognostic factors after surgical resection.

Authors:  Alfredo Guglielmi; Andrea Ruzzenente; Tommaso Campagnaro; Silvia Pachera; Alessandro Valdegamberi; Paola Nicoli; Alessandro Cappellani; Giulio Malfermoni; Calogero Iacono
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Is hepatic resection justified after chemotherapy in patients with colorectal liver metastases and lymph node involvement?

Authors:  René Adam; Robbert J de Haas; Dennis A Wicherts; Thomas A Aloia; Valérie Delvart; Daniel Azoulay; Henri Bismuth; Denis Castaing
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  13 in total

1.  Contemporary practice and short-term outcomes after liver resections in a complete national cohort.

Authors:  Kristoffer Lassen; Linn Såve Nymo; Frank Olsen; Kristoffer Watten Brudvik; Åsmund Avdem Fretland; Kjetil Søreide
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  A NSQIP Review of Major Morbidity and Mortality of Synchronous Liver Resection for Colorectal Metastasis Stratified by Extent of Liver Resection and Type of Colorectal Resection.

Authors:  Christopher R Shubert; Elizabeth B Habermann; John R Bergquist; Cornelius A Thiels; Kristine M Thomsen; Walter K Kremers; Michael L Kendrick; Robert R Cima; David M Nagorney
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Elevated Lactate is Independently Associated with Adverse Outcomes Following Hepatectomy.

Authors:  Madeline Lemke; Paul J Karanicolas; Rogeh Habashi; Ramy Behman; Natalie G Coburn; Sherif S Hanna; Calvin H L Law; Julie Hallet
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Comparison of the Extent Classification and the New Complexity Classification of Hepatectomy for Prediction of Surgical Outcomes: a Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Xiao-Long Wu; Zhi-Yu Li; Yong Jiang; Xinyu Bi; Hong Zhao; Jian-Jun Zhao; Zhen Huang; Ye-Fan Zhang; Jian-Qiang Cai
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Outcomes after vascular resection during curative-intent resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a multi-institution study from the US extrahepatic biliary malignancy consortium.

Authors:  Gregory V Schimizzi; Linda X Jin; Jesse T Davidson; Bradley A Krasnick; Cecilia G Ethun; Timothy M Pawlik; George Poultsides; Thuy Tran; Kamran Idrees; Chelsea A Isom; Sharon M Weber; Ahmed Salem; William G Hawkins; Steven M Strasberg; Maria B Doyle; William C Chapman; Robert C G Martin; Charles Scoggins; Perry Shen; Harveshp D Mogal; Carl Schmidt; Eliza Beal; Ioannis Hatzaras; Rivfka Shenoy; Shishir K Maithel; Ryan C Fields
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 3.647

6.  Preoperative anemia and postoperative outcomes after hepatectomy.

Authors:  Samer Tohme; Patrick R Varley; Douglas P Landsittel; Alexis P Chidi; Allan Tsung
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 3.647

7.  Clinical Factors and Postoperative Impact of Bile Leak After Liver Resection.

Authors:  Allison N Martin; Sowmya Narayanan; Florence E Turrentine; Todd W Bauer; Reid B Adams; George J Stukenborg; Victor M Zaydfudim
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Completion of a Liver Surgery Complexity Score and Classification Based on an International Survey of Experts.

Authors:  Major K Lee; Feng Gao; Steven M Strasberg
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2016-04-09       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  Risk Factors for 30-Day Unplanned Readmission and Major Perioperative Complications After Spine Fusion Surgery in Adults: A Review of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.

Authors:  Alvin W Su; Elizabeth B Habermann; Kristine M Thomsen; Todd A Milbrandt; Ahmad Nassr; A Noelle Larson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 3.241

10.  Shaping the future of liver surgery: Implementation of experimental insights into liver regeneration.

Authors:  D Pereyra; P Starlinger
Journal:  Eur Surg       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 0.953

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.