Literature DB >> 25198265

Ondansetron compared with doxylamine and pyridoxine for treatment of nausea in pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial.

Lauren G Oliveira1, Shannon M Capp, Whitney B You, Robert H Riffenburgh, Shaun D Carstairs.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether ondansetron or the combination of doxylamine and pyridoxine was superior for the treatment of nausea and vomiting of pregnancy.
METHODS: This was a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial in which women with nausea and vomiting of pregnancy were assigned to 4 mg of ondansetron plus a placebo tablet or 25 mg pyridoxine plus 12.5 mg of doxylamine for 5 days. The primary outcome was an improvement in nausea as reported on a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes were a reduction in vomiting on the VAS and the proportion of patients reporting sedation or constipation while using either study regimen.
RESULTS: Thirty-six women (18 in each group) were randomized to either ondansetron or pyridoxine and doxylamine, of whom 13 (72%) and 17 (94%) completed follow-up, respectively. There were no differences among the groups with regard to demographic characteristics or baseline nausea. Patients randomized to ondansetron were more likely to have an improvement in their baseline nausea as compared with those using pyridoxine and doxylamine over the course of 5 days of treatment (median VAS score decreased 51 mm [interquartile range 37-64] compared with 20 mm [8-51]; P=.019). Furthermore, women using ondansetron reported less vomiting (median VAS decreased 41 [interquartile range 17-57] compared with 17 [-4 to 38]; P=.049). There was no significant difference between the groups regarding sedation or constipation.
CONCLUSION: Our investigation showed ondansetron to be superior to the combination of pyridoxine and doxylamine in the treatment of nausea and emesis in pregnancy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01668069. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: : I.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25198265     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000479

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  7 in total

Review 1.  Treatment options for hyperemesis gravidarum.

Authors:  Amy Abramowitz; Emily S Miller; Katherine L Wisner
Journal:  Arch Womens Ment Health       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 2.  Nausea and vomiting of pregnancy - What's new?

Authors:  Martha Bustos; Raman Venkataramanan; Steve Caritis
Journal:  Auton Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 3.145

3.  Demonstration of early efficacy results of the delayed-release combination of doxylamine-pyridoxine for the treatment of nausea and vomiting of pregnancy.

Authors:  Gideon Koren; Shannon Clark; Gary D V Hankins; Steve N Caritis; Jason G Umans; Menachem Miodovnik; Donald R Mattison; Ilan Matok
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 4.  Supportive medication in cancer during pregnancy.

Authors:  Flora Zagouri; Nikolaos Dedes; Alkistis Papatheodoridi; Michael Liontos; Meletios Athanasios Dimopoulos
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 5.  Emerging Progress in Nausea and Vomiting of Pregnancy and Hyperemesis Gravidarum: Challenges and Opportunities.

Authors:  Chuan Liu; Guo Zhao; Danni Qiao; Lintao Wang; Yeling He; Mingge Zhao; Yuanyuan Fan; Enshe Jiang
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-01-10

Review 6.  Interventions for nausea and vomiting in early pregnancy.

Authors:  Anne Matthews; David M Haas; Dónal P O'Mathúna; Therese Dowswell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-09-08

7.  Validating the effect of Ondansetron and Mirtazapine In Treating hyperemesis gravidarum (VOMIT): protocol for a randomised placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Anne Ostenfeld; Tonny Studsgaard Petersen; Tina Bergmann Futtrup; Jon Trærup Andersen; Andreas Kryger Jensen; Hanne Brix Westergaard; Lars Henning Pedersen; Ellen Christine Leth Løkkegaard
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.