INTRODUCTION: Women increasingly occupy manual labor jobs. However, research examining women working under hot-humid conditions is lacking. Therefore, the purpose of our study was to assess how increasing relative humidity (RH) affects women's thermoregulation during low-intensity exercise characteristic of 8 h self-paced manual labor. METHODS: There were 10 women (age: 23 ± 2 yr; body-surface area: 1.68 ± 0.13 m²; Vo2max: 46 ± 6 ml · kg⁻¹ · min⁻¹) who walked 90 min at 35% Vo2max in 35°C at 55% RH (55RH), 70% RH (70RH), and 85% RH (85RH). Investigators obtained: 1) rectal temperature (Tre), mean-weighted skin temperature (Tsk), and heart rate every 5 min; and 2) respiratory measures every 30 min. RESULTS: Heat production (H) and required rate of evaporative cooling (Ereq) remained constant among trials; each RH increment significantly decreased evaporative heat loss (E), but increased heart rate and sweat rate. All other calorimetric and thermometric variables were similar between 55RH and 70RH, but significantly greater in 85RH. Tre only exceeded 38°C in 85RH after walking ∼80 min. Combined, dry and respiratory heat losses only compensated for <30% of the decreases in E. CONCLUSION: Women exercising at low intensities in 35°C experienced most statistically significant physiological changes after 70RH. As H and Ereq remained constant across trials, heat storage increased with each 15% rise in RH because dry and respiratory heat losses minimally offset decreased E. Higher Tre, Tsk, and resultantly higher sweat rates reflected heat storage increases as E decreased in each trial. Overall, at 35°C Ta, we found women exercising for 90 min at low intensities remained at safe rectal temperatures up to 70% RH.
INTRODUCTION:Women increasingly occupy manual labor jobs. However, research examining women working under hot-humid conditions is lacking. Therefore, the purpose of our study was to assess how increasing relative humidity (RH) affects women's thermoregulation during low-intensity exercise characteristic of 8 h self-paced manual labor. METHODS: There were 10 women (age: 23 ± 2 yr; body-surface area: 1.68 ± 0.13 m²; Vo2max: 46 ± 6 ml · kg⁻¹ · min⁻¹) who walked 90 min at 35% Vo2max in 35°C at 55% RH (55RH), 70% RH (70RH), and 85% RH (85RH). Investigators obtained: 1) rectal temperature (Tre), mean-weighted skin temperature (Tsk), and heart rate every 5 min; and 2) respiratory measures every 30 min. RESULTS: Heat production (H) and required rate of evaporative cooling (Ereq) remained constant among trials; each RH increment significantly decreased evaporative heat loss (E), but increased heart rate and sweat rate. All other calorimetric and thermometric variables were similar between 55RH and 70RH, but significantly greater in 85RH. Tre only exceeded 38°C in 85RH after walking ∼80 min. Combined, dry and respiratory heat losses only compensated for <30% of the decreases in E. CONCLUSION:Women exercising at low intensities in 35°C experienced most statistically significant physiological changes after 70RH. As H and Ereq remained constant across trials, heat storage increased with each 15% rise in RH because dry and respiratory heat losses minimally offset decreased E. Higher Tre, Tsk, and resultantly higher sweat rates reflected heat storage increases as E decreased in each trial. Overall, at 35°C Ta, we found women exercising for 90 min at low intensities remained at safe rectal temperatures up to 70% RH.
Authors: Zachary J Schlader; Blair D Johnson; Riana R Pryor; Jocelyn Stooks; Brian M Clemency; David Hostler Journal: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol Date: 2020-04-01 Impact factor: 3.619
Authors: Brendon P McDermott; Scott A Anderson; Lawrence E Armstrong; Douglas J Casa; Samuel N Cheuvront; Larry Cooper; W Larry Kenney; Francis G O'Connor; William O Roberts Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Margarita Cernych; Neringa Baranauskiene; Nerijus Eimantas; Sigitas Kamandulis; Laura Daniuseviciute; Marius Brazaitis Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2017-08-07
Authors: Timothy Gustavo Cavazzotto; Enio Ricardo Vaz Ronque; Edgar Ramos Vieira; Marcos Roberto Queiroga; Helio Serassuelo Junior Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-05-21 Impact factor: 3.390