STUDY OBJECTIVES AND DESIGN: Rapid eye movement sleep without atonia (RWA) is the polysomnographic hallmark of REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD). To partially overcome the disadvantages of manual RWA scoring, which is time consuming but essential for the accurate diagnosis of RBD, we aimed to validate software specifically developed and integrated with polysomnography for RWA detection against the gold standard of manual RWA quantification. SETTING: Academic referral center sleep laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Polysomnographic recordings of 20 patients with RBD and 60 healthy volunteers were analyzed. INTERVENTIONS: N/A. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Motor activity during REM sleep was quantified manually and computer assisted (with and without artifact detection) according to Sleep Innsbruck Barcelona (SINBAR) criteria for the mentalis ("any," phasic, tonic electromyographic [EMG] activity) and the flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) muscle (phasic EMG activity). Computer-derived indices (with and without artifact correction) for "any," phasic, tonic mentalis EMG activity, phasic FDS EMG activity, and the SINBAR index ("any" mentalis + phasic FDS) correlated well with the manually derived indices (all Spearman rhos 0.66-0.98). In contrast with computerized scoring alone, computerized scoring plus manual artifact correction (median duration 5.4 min) led to a significant reduction of false positives for "any" mentalis (40%), phasic mentalis (40.6%), and the SINBAR index (41.2%). Quantification of tonic mentalis and phasic FDS EMG activity was not influenced by artifact correction. CONCLUSION: The computer algorithm used here appears to be a promising tool for REM sleep behavior disorder detection in both research and clinical routine. A short check for plausibility of automatic detection should be a basic prerequisite for this and all other available computer algorithms.
STUDY OBJECTIVES AND DESIGN: Rapid eye movement sleep without atonia (RWA) is the polysomnographic hallmark of REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD). To partially overcome the disadvantages of manual RWA scoring, which is time consuming but essential for the accurate diagnosis of RBD, we aimed to validate software specifically developed and integrated with polysomnography for RWA detection against the gold standard of manual RWA quantification. SETTING: Academic referral center sleep laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Polysomnographic recordings of 20 patients with RBD and 60 healthy volunteers were analyzed. INTERVENTIONS: N/A. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Motor activity during REM sleep was quantified manually and computer assisted (with and without artifact detection) according to Sleep Innsbruck Barcelona (SINBAR) criteria for the mentalis ("any," phasic, tonic electromyographic [EMG] activity) and the flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) muscle (phasic EMG activity). Computer-derived indices (with and without artifact correction) for "any," phasic, tonic mentalis EMG activity, phasic FDS EMG activity, and the SINBAR index ("any" mentalis + phasic FDS) correlated well with the manually derived indices (all Spearman rhos 0.66-0.98). In contrast with computerized scoring alone, computerized scoring plus manual artifact correction (median duration 5.4 min) led to a significant reduction of false positives for "any" mentalis (40%), phasic mentalis (40.6%), and the SINBAR index (41.2%). Quantification of tonic mentalis and phasic FDS EMG activity was not influenced by artifact correction. CONCLUSION: The computer algorithm used here appears to be a promising tool for REM sleep behavior disorder detection in both research and clinical routine. A short check for plausibility of automatic detection should be a basic prerequisite for this and all other available computer algorithms.
Authors: Jacob Kempfner; Gertrud Sorensen; Marielle Zoetmulder; Poul Jennum; Helge B D Sorensen Journal: Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc Date: 2010
Authors: Raffaele Ferri; Francesco Rundo; Mauro Manconi; Giuseppe Plazzi; Oliviero Bruni; Alessandro Oldani; Luigi Ferini-Strambi; Marco Zucconi Journal: Sleep Med Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 3.492
Authors: Jacques Montplaisir; Jean-Francois Gagnon; Maria Livia Fantini; Ronald B Postuma; Yves Dauvilliers; Alex Desautels; Sylvie Rompré; Jean Paquet Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2010-10-15 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: R B Postuma; J F Gagnon; M Vendette; M L Fantini; J Massicotte-Marquez; J Montplaisir Journal: Neurology Date: 2008-12-24 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Geert Mayer; Karl Kesper; Thomas Ploch; Sebastian Canisius; Thomas Penzel; Wolfgang Oertel; Karin Stiasny-Kolster Journal: J Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 2.177
Authors: Stuart J McCarter; Erik K St Louis; David J Sandness; Ethan J Duwell; Paul C Timm; Bradley F Boeve; Michael H Silber Journal: Sleep Med Date: 2016-05-11 Impact factor: 3.492
Authors: Iva Milerska; Vaclav Kremen; Vaclav Gerla; Erik K St Louis; Lenka Lhotska Journal: Biomed Signal Process Control Date: 2019-03-07 Impact factor: 3.880
Authors: Cathy A Goldstein; Richard B Berry; David T Kent; David A Kristo; Azizi A Seixas; Susan Redline; M Brandon Westover Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2020-04-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: John C Feemster; Youngsin Jung; Paul C Timm; Sarah M Westerland; Thomas R Gossard; Luke N Teigen; Lauren A Buchal; Elena F D Cattaneo; Charlotte A Imlach; Stuart J Mccarter; Kevin L Smith; Bradley F Boeve; Michael H Silber; Erik K St Louis Journal: Sleep Date: 2019-10-09 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Yves Dauvilliers; Carlos H Schenck; Ronald B Postuma; Alex Iranzo; Pierre-Herve Luppi; Giuseppe Plazzi; Jacques Montplaisir; Bradley Boeve Journal: Nat Rev Dis Primers Date: 2018-08-30 Impact factor: 52.329
Authors: Mitchell G Miglis; Charles H Adler; Elena Antelmi; Dario Arnaldi; Luca Baldelli; Bradley F Boeve; Matteo Cesari; Irene Dall'Antonia; Nico J Diederich; Kathrin Doppler; Petr Dušek; Raffaele Ferri; Jean-François Gagnon; Ziv Gan-Or; Wiebke Hermann; Birgit Högl; Michele T Hu; Alex Iranzo; Annette Janzen; Anastasia Kuzkina; Jee-Young Lee; Klaus L Leenders; Simon J G Lewis; Claudio Liguori; Jun Liu; Christine Lo; Kaylena A Ehgoetz Martens; Jiri Nepozitek; Giuseppe Plazzi; Federica Provini; Monica Puligheddu; Michal Rolinski; Jan Rusz; Ambra Stefani; Rebekah L S Summers; Dallah Yoo; Jennifer Zitser; Wolfgang H Oertel Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2021-08 Impact factor: 44.182