Literature DB >> 25197493

Genomic analysis of Skermanella stibiiresistens type strain SB22 (T.).

Wentao Zhu1, Jing Huang1, Mingshun Li1, Xiangyang Li1, Gejiao Wang1.   

Abstract

Members of genus Skermanella were described as Gram-negative, motile, aerobic, rod-shaped, obligate-heterotrophic bacteria and unable to fix nitrogen. In this study, the genome sequence of Skermanella stibiiresistens SB22(T) is reported. Phylogenetic analysis using core proteins confirmed the phylogenetic assignment based on 16S rRNA gene sequences. Strain SB22(T) has all the proteins for complete glycolysis, tricarboxylic acid cycle and pentose phosphate pathway. The RuBisCO encoding genes cbbL1S1 and nitrogenase delta subunit gene anfG are absent, consistent with its inability to fix carbon and nitrogen, respectively. In addition, the genome possesses a series of flagellar assembly and chemotaxis genes to ensure its motility.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Skermanella stibiiresistens; chemotaxis; flagella; genome sequence; metabolism

Year:  2014        PMID: 25197493      PMCID: PMC4149033          DOI: 10.4056/sigs.5751047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

The type species for the genus is ACM 2042T, which was originally proposed as by Skerman et al. in 1983 [1]. Later, it was transferred to the genus (family ) on the basis of phylogenetic evidence and phenotypic characteristics, especially the inability to fix nitrogen [2,3]. At present, this genus comprises four validly published species, [3], [4], [5] and [6], which were isolated from fresh water, air, sandy soil and a coal mine, respectively. was characterized as a Gram-negative, non-spore-forming bacterium with unicellular and multicellular phases of growth, an obligate chemo-organotroph and facultative anaerobe, unable to fix nitrogen, and with a high DNA G+C content. To the best of our knowledge, genome information for members is still not available. In this study, we present the draft genome sequence of a type strain SB22T and compare it with the members of the related genera and .

Classification and features

SB22T is Gram-negative, motile, rod-shaped with single polar flagella and non-sporulating (Figure 1). Ten related strains with complete genome sequences belong to (3 strains), (3 strains), (2 strains), (1 strain) and (1 strain). A total of 515 conserved proteins were identified among them using cluster algorithm tool MCL (http://micans.org/mcl/) with default values and a neighbor joining (NJ) tree was built based on this set. The phylogenetic tree showed that strain SB22T was closely related to the genera and , which was consistent with the taxonomy previously determined by 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis [6]. Classification and general features of SB22T are shown in Table 1. Figure 2 shows the phylogenetic neighborhood of SB22T in a core-protein based tree.
Figure 1

A transmission micrograph of SB22T, made using a Hitachi H-7000FA transmission electron microscope operating at 100 kV. The scale bar represents 2 μm.

Table 1

Classification and general features of SB22T according to the MIGS recommendations [7].

MIGS IDPropertyTermEvidence code
Current classificationDomain BacteriaTAS [8]
Phylum ProteobacteriaTAS [9]
Class AlphaproteobacteriaTAS [10,11]
Order RhodospirillalesTAS [12,13]
Family RhodospirillaceaeTAS [12,13]
Genus SkermanellaTAS [3,4,6]
Species Skermanella stibiiresistensTAS [6]
Type strain SB22TTAS [6]
Gram stainNegativeTAS [6]
Cell shapeRod-shapedTAS [6]
MotilityMotileTAS [6]
SporulationNon-sporulatingTAS [6]
Optimum temperature4-37ºCTAS [6]
Carbon sourceD-glucose, D-ribose, rhamnose, L-proline, salicin, inositol, DL-lactate, L-alanine, malic acid, potassium 2-ketogluconate and 3-hydroxybutyric acidTAS [6]
Energy sourceChemoorganotrophTAS [6]
Terminal electron receptorMolecular oxygenTAS [6]
MIGS-6.2pH5-9TAS [6]
MIGS-22OxygenAerobicTAS [6]
MIGS-15Biotic relationshipFree-livingNAS
MIGS-14PathogenicityNon-pathogenicNAS
MIGS-4Geographic locationJixi coal mine of Jixi City, Heilongjiang Province, northeast ChinaTAS [6]
MIGS-5Sample collection time2011TAS [6]
MIGS-4.1MIGS-4.2LatitudeLongitudeN45°18'E130°57'TAS [6]TAS [6]
MIGS-4.3DepthSurface sandy soilTAS [6]
MIGS-4.4AltitudeNot reported

Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay; TAS: Traceable Author Statement; NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement. These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [14]. If the evidence is IDA, then the property was directly observed for a live isolate by one of the authors or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements.

Figure 2

A NJ phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of SB22T with other completely sequenced strains that belong to the same family (). All protein FASTA files were obtained from NCBI. The corresponding GenBank accession numbers are displayed in parentheses. A total of 515 conserved proteins were identified using cluster algorithm tool MCL. The 515 amino acid sequences were aligned using Clustal W [15] and the NJ tree was built using MEGA 5.05 [16] with boot strap value of 1,000.

A transmission micrograph of SB22T, made using a Hitachi H-7000FA transmission electron microscope operating at 100 kV. The scale bar represents 2 μm. Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay; TAS: Traceable Author Statement; NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement. These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [14]. If the evidence is IDA, then the property was directly observed for a live isolate by one of the authors or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements. A NJ phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of SB22T with other completely sequenced strains that belong to the same family (). All protein FASTA files were obtained from NCBI. The corresponding GenBank accession numbers are displayed in parentheses. A total of 515 conserved proteins were identified using cluster algorithm tool MCL. The 515 amino acid sequences were aligned using Clustal W [15] and the NJ tree was built using MEGA 5.05 [16] with boot strap value of 1,000.

Genome sequencing information

Genome project history

SB22T was sequenced by Majorbio Bio-pharm Technology Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China. The draft genome sequence was deposited in NCBI with contigs less than 200 bp cut off. The GenBank accession number is AVFL00000000. A summary of the genome sequencing project information is shown in Table 2.
Table 2

Genome sequencing project information of SB22T

MIGS IDPropertyTerm
MIGS-31Finishing qualityHigh-quality draft
MIGS-28Libraries usedIllumina Paired-End library (300 bp insert size)
MIGS-29Sequencing platformIllumina Hiseq2000
MIGS-31.2Sequencing coverage184.5 ×
MIGS-30AssemblersSOAPdenovo v1.05
MIGS-32Gene calling methodGeneMarkS+
GenBank date of releaseFebruary 23, 2014
NCBI project IDAVFL00000000
MIGS-13Source material identifierSB22T
Project relevanceGenome comparison

Growth condition and DNA isolation

SB22T was grown aerobically in R2A medium at 28°C for 2 days. It can also grow on LB medium under the same conditions. The strain was apricot-colored after incubated 72 h at 28°C on R2A agar. The DNA was isolated using the QiAamp kit according to the manufacturer’s instruction (Qiagen, German).

Genome sequencing and assembly

The Illumina Hiseq2000 technology with Paired-End (PE) library strategy was used to determine the sequence of SB22T. A total of 7,588,874 x 2 high quality reads totaling 1,454,191,294 bp data with an average coverage 184.5 x was generated. Illumina sequencing data was assembled with SOAPdenovo, version 1.05 (http://soap.genomics.org.cn/). The initial draft assembly contained 7,879,677 bp in 257 contigs. Then the draft genome sequence was deposited to the NCBI with contigs less than 200 bp nucleotides cut off.

Genome annotation

The draft genome sequence was deposited to NCBI and was annotated though the Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP), using the Best-placed reference protein set and the gene caller GeneMarkS+. Signal peptides and transmembrane helices were predicted by SignalP [17] and SOSUI [18], respectively. The WebMGA-server [19] was used to identify the Clusters of Orthologs Groups (COG).

Genome properties

The final whole genome of SB22T was 7,868,338 bp long in 190 contigs (with PEGs) with an average GC content of 65.88%. Of the total 7,378 predicted genes, 7,269 were protein-coding genes and 63 were RNA genes. A total of 5,176 protein-coding genes (71%) were assigned with putative functions with the remaining was annotated as hypothetical proteins. The property and the statistics of this genome are summarized in Table 3. We reordered the contigs using MAUVE, version 2.3 [20] with the complete genome sequence of …( ) as a reference and a graphical circular map of SB22T is shown in Figure 3. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is shown in Table 4.
Table 3

Nucleotide content and gene count level in genome of SB22T

AttributeValue% of Totala
Genome size (bp)7,868,388 bp100
Number of contigs190
Contig N50214,710 bp
Total genes7,378100
Protein-coding genes7,26998.52
Pseudo genes460.62
RNA genes630.86
Frame shifted genes13
DNA coding region (bp)6,849,86187.06
Protein-coding genes with function prediction5,17671.21
Protein-coding genes assigned to COGs5,87780.85
Protein-coding genes with transmembrane helices1,67323.02
Protein-coding genes with signal peptides5237.19
CRISPR repeats2

a The total is based on either the size of the genome in base pairs or the total number of protein coding genes in the annotated genome.

Figure 3

A graphical circular map of SB22T. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand, Genes on reverse strand, tRNA genes, GC content and GC skew.

Table 4

Number of protein-coding genes associated with the 25 general COG functional categories in SB22T genome.

CodeValue%ageaCOG Category
J1882.59Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
A10.01RNA processing and modification
K4786.58Transcription
L2403.30Replication, recombination and repair
B60.08Chromatin structure and dynamics
D500.69Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning
Y00.00Nuclear structure
V731.00Defense mechanisms
T6518.96Signal transduction mechanisms
M3895.35Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis
N1472.02Cell motility
Z00.00Cytoskeleton
W00.00Extracellular structures
U761.05Intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport
O1952.68Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C4055.57Energy production and conversion
G5086.99Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E6789.33Amino acid transport and metabolism
F1011.39Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H2303.16Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I2673.67Lipid transport and metabolism
P3835.27Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q2263.11Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R78710.83General function prediction only
S5737.88Function unknown
-6178.49Not in COGS

a The total is based on the total number of protein coding genes in the annotated genome.

a The total is based on either the size of the genome in base pairs or the total number of protein coding genes in the annotated genome. A graphical circular map of SB22T. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand, Genes on reverse strand, tRNA genes, GC content and GC skew. a The total is based on the total number of protein coding genes in the annotated genome.

Profiles of metabolic networks and pathways

The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) [21] was used to reconstruct the pathways of SB22T [Figure 4]. The metabolic pathways suggest that strain SB22T possess necessary encoding genes for central carbohydrate metabolism, such as glycolysis, the TCA cycle and the pentose phosphate pathway, to support basic growth. But it has relatively few lipid metabolism pathways. Only one integrated pathway that could synthesize tetracosanoyl-CoA from acyl-CoA is found in cytoplasm. This result indicates that strain SB22T might have certain limitations in some lipid utilization.
Figure 4

Metabolic pathways of SB22T as predicted using KEGG. Green lines indicate pathways that are possessed by this strain.

Metabolic pathways of SB22T as predicted using KEGG. Green lines indicate pathways that are possessed by this strain.

Genes involved in carbon fixation

Genus belongs to family , but species cannot fix carbon as [22] and [23] do. Genomic analysis of SB22T, shows that the RuBisCO encoding genes cbbL1S1 [24,25] are not present, which is in agreement with the strain’s inability to fix carbon.

Genes involved in nitrogen metabolism

Strain SB22T is closely related to some species of genera and [6]. Genus is described as a photosynthetic non-sulfur purple bacterium that favors growth in an anoxygenic, photosynthetic, nitrogen-fixing environment [26]. Some aerobic nitrogen fixing strains of have significant effects on crop plants [27]. But genus is unable to fix nitrogen under microaerophilic conditions [3,4,6]. Even though nitrogenase genes nifDKH are present in the genome of SB22T, we found that the nitrogenase delta subunit gene anfG is absent.

Flagella and chemotaxis

Many flagella genes were identified in SB22T genome. A KEGG map demonstrates that this strain possesses a series of genes belonging to the families flg, fli and flh in flagellar assembly (Figure 5). These genes enable strain SB22T to move to a more suitable environment. In the same region of the genome as the flagella genes, we also identified genes encoding the central signal transduction pathway for chemotaxis (che), such as the conserved cheAWYBR genes and a group of transmembrane chemoreceptors (known as MCPs or methyl-accepting proteins), which are present in nearly all motile bacteria [23]. The MCPs may sense environment signals and transfer them to the signal transduction histidine kinase CheA, whose activity is positively regulated by CheW. CheA in turn phosphorylates a response regulator CheYVB, which controls the rotational direction of the flagella motor [28].
Figure 5

The KEGG flagellar assembly map. Green labels represent the flagella proteins that are encoded on the SB22T genome.

The KEGG flagellar assembly map. Green labels represent the flagella proteins that are encoded on the SB22T genome.
  20 in total

1.  List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.747

2.  SOSUI: classification and secondary structure prediction system for membrane proteins.

Authors:  T Hirokawa; S Boon-Chieng; S Mitaku
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods.

Authors:  Koichiro Tamura; Daniel Peterson; Nicholas Peterson; Glen Stecher; Masatoshi Nei; Sudhir Kumar
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 4.  The two-component signaling pathway of bacterial chemotaxis: a molecular view of signal transduction by receptors, kinases, and adaptation enzymes.

Authors:  J J Falke; R B Bass; S L Butler; S A Chervitz; M A Danielson
Journal:  Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 13.827

Review 5.  Azospirillum, a free-living nitrogen-fixing bacterium closely associated with grasses: genetic, biochemical and ecological aspects.

Authors:  O Steenhoudt; J Vanderleyden
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 16.408

6.  Skermanella stibiiresistens sp. nov., a highly antimony-resistant bacterium isolated from coal-mining soil, and emended description of the genus Skermanella.

Authors:  Guosheng Luo; Zunji Shi; Hui Wang; Gejiao Wang
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 2.747

7.  Skermanella xinjiangensis sp. nov., isolated from the desert of Xinjiang, China.

Authors:  Hongli An; Lei Zhang; Yali Tang; Xuesong Luo; Tongjun Sun; Yaowei Li; Yang Wang; Jun Dai; Chengxiang Fang
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.747

Review 8.  Multiple Rubisco forms in proteobacteria: their functional significance in relation to CO2 acquisition by the CBB cycle.

Authors:  Murray Ronald Badger; Emily Jane Bek
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2008-02-02       Impact factor: 6.992

9.  The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification.

Authors:  Dawn Field; George Garrity; Tanya Gray; Norman Morrison; Jeremy Selengut; Peter Sterk; Tatiana Tatusova; Nicholas Thomson; Michael J Allen; Samuel V Angiuoli; Michael Ashburner; Nelson Axelrod; Sandra Baldauf; Stuart Ballard; Jeffrey Boore; Guy Cochrane; James Cole; Peter Dawyndt; Paul De Vos; Claude DePamphilis; Robert Edwards; Nadeem Faruque; Robert Feldman; Jack Gilbert; Paul Gilna; Frank Oliver Glöckner; Philip Goldstein; Robert Guralnick; Dan Haft; David Hancock; Henning Hermjakob; Christiane Hertz-Fowler; Phil Hugenholtz; Ian Joint; Leonid Kagan; Matthew Kane; Jessie Kennedy; George Kowalchuk; Renzo Kottmann; Eugene Kolker; Saul Kravitz; Nikos Kyrpides; Jim Leebens-Mack; Suzanna E Lewis; Kelvin Li; Allyson L Lister; Phillip Lord; Natalia Maltsev; Victor Markowitz; Jennifer Martiny; Barbara Methe; Ilene Mizrachi; Richard Moxon; Karen Nelson; Julian Parkhill; Lita Proctor; Owen White; Susanna-Assunta Sansone; Andrew Spiers; Robert Stevens; Paul Swift; Chris Taylor; Yoshio Tateno; Adrian Tett; Sarah Turner; David Ussery; Bob Vaughan; Naomi Ward; Trish Whetzel; Ingio San Gil; Gareth Wilson; Anil Wipat
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 54.908

10.  Genomic insights into the versatility of the plant growth-promoting bacterium Azospirillum amazonense.

Authors:  Fernando H Sant'Anna; Luiz G P Almeida; Ricardo Cecagno; Luciano A Reolon; Franciele M Siqueira; Maicon R S Machado; Ana T R Vasconcelos; Irene S Schrank
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 3.969

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Microbial Antimony Biogeochemistry: Enzymes, Regulation, and Related Metabolic Pathways.

Authors:  Jingxin Li; Qian Wang; Ronald S Oremland; Thomas R Kulp; Christopher Rensing; Gejiao Wang
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Impact of Intercropping on the Diazotrophic Community in the Soils of Continuous Cucumber Cropping Systems.

Authors:  Huan Gao; Sen Li; Fengzhi Wu
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 5.640

3.  First isolation of Skermanella aerolata from a human sample.

Authors:  R Onori; M Marín; B Rodríguez-Sánchez; C Oliver; P Muñoz; E Bouza; L Alcalá
Journal:  Rev Esp Quimioter       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 1.553

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.