Literature DB >> 25197447

Genome sequence of the Medicago-nodulating Ensifer meliloti commercial inoculant strain RRI128.

Wayne Reeve1, Ross Ballard2, Elizabeth Drew2, Rui Tian1, Lambert Bräu3, Lynne Goodwin4, Marcel Huntemann5, James Han5, Reddy Tatiparthi5, Amy Chen6, Konstantinos Mavrommatis6, Victor Markowitz6, Krishna Palaniappan6, Natalia Ivanova5, Amrita Pati5, Tanja Woyke5, Nikos Kyrpides5.   

Abstract

Ensifer meliloti strain RRI128 is an aerobic, motile, Gram-negative, non-spore-forming rod. RRI128 was isolated from a nodule recovered from the roots of barrel medic (Medicago truncatula) grown in the greenhouse and inoculated with soil collected from Victoria, Australia. The strain is used in commercial inoculants in Australia. RRI128 nodulates and forms an effective symbiosis with a diverse range of lucerne cultivars (Medicago sativa) and several species of annual medic (M. truncatula, Medicago littoralis and Medicago tornata), but forms an ineffective symbiosis with Medicago polymorpha. Here we describe the features of E. meliloti strain RRI128, together with genome sequence information and annotation. The 6,900,273 bp draft genome is arranged into 156 scaffolds of 157 contigs, contains 6,683 protein-coding genes and 87 RNA-only encoding genes, and is one of 100 rhizobial genomes sequenced as part of the DOE Joint Genome Institute 2010 Genomic Encyclopedia for Bacteria and Archaea-Root Nodule Bacteria (GEBA-RNB) project.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alphaproteobacteria; nitrogen fixation; rhizobia; root-nodule bacteria

Year:  2014        PMID: 25197447      PMCID: PMC4149011          DOI: 10.4056/sigs.4929626

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

strain RRI128 is used in Australia to produce commercial peat cultures (referred to as Group AL inoculants) mainly for the inoculation of lucerne (Medicago sativa L.). Lucerne is sown on about 600, 000 ha annually (A. Humphries pers. com.) and is nearly always inoculated prior to sowing. RRI128 is also used for the inoculation of strand medic (Medicago littoralis Loisel) and disc medic (Medicago tornata (L.) Miller), a hybrid of the two former species, and bokhara clover (Melilotus albus Medik). RRI128 has been used commercially since 2000 when it replaced strain WSM826 [1]. Strain RRI128 was isolated from a nodule from the roots of barrel medic (Medicago truncatula Gaertn) growing in the greenhouse and inoculated with an alkaline sandy soil (pHCaCl2 7.6) collected by J. Slattery, near Tempy, Victoria. The strain was selected for use in commercial inoculants following assessment of its nitrogen fixation capacity (effectiveness), growth on acidified agar and saprophytic competence in an in-situ soil study [2], with supporting data of satisfactory performance at ten field sites. Additional testing has shown RRI128 to be effective on 28 cultivars of lucerne (Ballard unpub. data). It also forms effective symbiosis with a range of strand and disc medics [2] which show symbiotic affinity with lucerne [3,4]. Soil acidity has long been recognized as a constraint to lucerne nodulation [5] with some evidence that strains of have less acidity tolerance than , possibly due to their association with Medicago species that favor neutral to alkaline soils [6]. With RRI128, constraints to lucerne nodulation are observed around pH 5. Nodulation of lucerne seedlings inoculated with RRI128 was 42% at pH 5.0 in solution culture experiments [7] and observed to decline rapidly at field sites where pHCaCl2 was below 4.7 (Ballard, unpub. data). Other strains (e.g. SRDI672) have increased lucerne nodulation in solution culture at pH 4.8 (61% cf. 12% of lucerne seedlings with nodules) but are probably approaching the limit of acidity tolerance for [8]. Stable colony morphology and cell survival on seed make RRI128 amenable to commercial use. RRI128 produces colonies of consistent appearance and with moderate polysaccharide when grown on yeast mannitol agar, enabling easy visual assessment of culture purity. It differs in this regard from the strain it replaced (WSM826) which produced ‘dry’ and ‘mucoid’ colony variants, in common with many of the strains that nodulate lucerne and medic [9]. When applied correctly RRI128 has been shown to survive at more than 10,000 cells per lucerne seed at six weeks after inoculation [10]. Good survival may well be characteristic of since former inoculant strain WSM826 is equally competent in this regard [11,12]. Here we present a preliminary description of the general features of strain RRI128 together with its genome sequence and annotation.

Classification and general features

strain RRI128 is a motile, non-sporulating, non-encapsulated, Gram-negative rod in the order of the class . The rod-shaped form varies in size with dimensions of approximately 0.5 μm in width and 1.0-2.0 μm in length (Figure 1A). It is fast growing, forming colonies within 3-4 days when grown on TY [13] or half strength Lupin Agar (½LA) [14] at 28°C. Colonies on ½LA are opaque, slightly domed and moderately mucoid with smooth margins (Figure 1B).
Figure 1

Images of strain RRI128 using (A) scanning electron microscopy and (B) light microscopy to show the colony morphology on TY plates.

Images of strain RRI128 using (A) scanning electron microscopy and (B) light microscopy to show the colony morphology on TY plates. Minimum Information about the Genome Sequence (MIGS) is provided in Table 1. Figure 2 shows the phylogenetic neighborhood of strain RRI128 in a 16S rRNA gene sequence based tree. This strain has 100% sequence identity (1366/1366 bp) at the 16S rRNA sequence level to the fully sequenced Sm1021 [30] and 99% 16S rRNA sequence (1362/1366 bp) identity to the fully sequenced strain WSM419 [31].
Table 1

Classification and general features of 15,16]

MIGS ID     Property       Term       Evidence code
     Current classification       Domain Bacteria       TAS [15,16]
       Phylum Proteobacteria       TAS [17]
       Class Alphaproteobacteria       TAS [18]
       Order Rhizobiales       TAS [19]
       Family Rhizobiaceae       TAS [20]
       Genus Ensifer       TAS [21,22]
       Species Ensifer meliloti       TAS [23,24]
       Strain RRI128
     Gram stain       Negative       IDA
     Cell shape       Rod       IDA
     Motility       Motile       IDA
     Sporulation       Non-sporulating       NAS
     Temperature range       Mesophile       NAS
     Optimum temperature       28°C       NAS
     Salinity       Non-halophile       NAS
MIGS-22     Oxygen requirement       Aerobic       IDA
     Carbon source       Varied       NAS
     Energy source       Chemoorganotroph       NAS
MIGS-6     Habitat       Soil, root nodule, on host       IDA
MIGS-15     Biotic relationship       Free living, symbiotic       IDA
MIGS-14     Pathogenicity       Non-pathogenic       NAS
     Biosafety level       1       TAS [25]
     Isolation       Root nodule       IDA
MIGS-4     Geographic location       Tempy, Vict., Australia       IDA
MIGS-5     Soil collection date       Circa 1995       IDA
MIGS-4.1MIGS-4.2     Latitude     Longitude       -35.1833       142.3833       IDA       IDA
MIGS-4.3     Depth       0-10 cm       IDA
MIGS-4.4     Altitude       Not reported

Evidence codes – IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay; TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [26].

Figure 2

Phylogenetic tree showing the relationship of strain RRI128 (shown in bold) with some of the root nodule bacteria in the order based on aligned sequences of the 16S rRNA gene (1,307 bp internal region). All sites were informative and there were no gap-containing sites. Phylogenetic analyses were performed using MEGA [27], version 5.05. The tree was built using the maximum likelihood method with the General Time Reversible model. Bootstrap analysis [28] with 500 replicates was performed to assess the support of the clusters. Type strains are indicated with a superscript T. Brackets after the strain name contain a DNA database accession number and/or a GOLD ID (beginning with the prefix G) for a sequencing project registered in GOLD [29]. Published genomes are indicated with an asterisk.

Evidence codes – IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay; TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [26]. Phylogenetic tree showing the relationship of strain RRI128 (shown in bold) with some of the root nodule bacteria in the order based on aligned sequences of the 16S rRNA gene (1,307 bp internal region). All sites were informative and there were no gap-containing sites. Phylogenetic analyses were performed using MEGA [27], version 5.05. The tree was built using the maximum likelihood method with the General Time Reversible model. Bootstrap analysis [28] with 500 replicates was performed to assess the support of the clusters. Type strains are indicated with a superscript T. Brackets after the strain name contain a DNA database accession number and/or a GOLD ID (beginning with the prefix G) for a sequencing project registered in GOLD [29]. Published genomes are indicated with an asterisk.

Symbiotaxonomy

strain RRI128 forms nodules on (Nod+) and fixes N2 (Fix+) with Medicago sativa, Melillotus albus and Trigonella balansae (Boiss. and Reuter). It also forms effective symbiosis with several species of annual medic (M. truncatula, M. littoralis and M. tornata) that happen to be closely related to each other based on their ability to be hybridized [5] and morphological and nucleotide sequence analyses of their relatedness [32]. RRI128 forms ineffective (white) nodules with Medicago polymorpha, a species that is generally recognized to have a more specific rhizobial requirement for effective symbiosis than Medicago sativa and Medicago littoralis [4,33] (Table 2).
Table 2

Compatibility of RRI128 with various Medicago and allied genera for nodulation (Nod) and N2-fixation (Fix).

Species Name     Cultivar or line      Common Name      Growth Type     Nod      Fix       Reference
Medicago sativa     *28 cultivars      Lucerne, Alfalfa      Perennial     +      +        [2]
M. littoralis     Harbinger, Herald, Angel      Strand medic      Annual     +      +        [2]
M. tornata     Tornafield, Rivoli      Disc medic      Annual     +      +        [2]
M. tornata×littoralis     Toreador      Hybrid disc medic      Annual     +      +        [2]
M. truncatula     Jester      Barrel medic      Annual     +      +       IDA
M. polymorpha     Scimitar      Burr medic      Annual     +(w)      -       IDA
Trigonella balansae     SA5045, SA32999, SA33025      Sickle fruited fenugreek      Annual     +      +        [34]
Melilotus albus     SA19917, SA35627, SA34665      Bokhara clover      Biennial     +      +       IDA

* 28 cultivars tested: Aquarius, Aurora, Cropper 9, Cuff 101, Eureka, Genesis, Hallmark, Hunterfield, Hunter River, Jinderra, ML 99, PL 55, PL 60, PL 69, Prime, SARDI Five, SARDI Seven, SARDI Ten, Sceptre, Sequel, Sequel-HR, Siriver, Trifecta, UQL1, Venus, WL525HQ, 54Q53 and 57Q75.

(w) indicates white nodules.

IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay; evidence code from the Gene Ontology project [26]

* 28 cultivars tested: Aquarius, Aurora, Cropper 9, Cuff 101, Eureka, Genesis, Hallmark, Hunterfield, Hunter River, Jinderra, ML 99, PL 55, PL 60, PL 69, Prime, SARDI Five, SARDI Seven, SARDI Ten, Sceptre, Sequel, Sequel-HR, Siriver, Trifecta, UQL1, Venus, WL525HQ, 54Q53 and 57Q75. (w) indicates white nodules. IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay; evidence code from the Gene Ontology project [26]

Genome sequencing and annotation

Genome project history

This organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of its environmental and agricultural relevance to issues in global carbon cycling, alternative energy production, and biogeochemical importance, and is part of the Community Sequencing Program at the U.S. Department of Energy, Joint Genome Institute (JGI) for projects of relevance to agency missions. The genome project is deposited in the Genomes OnLine Database [29] and an improved-high-quality-draft genome sequence in IMG/GEBA. Sequencing, finishing and annotation were performed by the JGI. A summary of the project information is shown in Table 3.
Table 3

Genome sequencing project information for strain RRI128

MIGS ID     Property       Term
MIGS-31     Finishing quality       High-Quality-Draft
MIGS-28     Libraries used       1× Illumina Std library
MIGS-29     Sequencing platforms       Illumina HiSeq 2000
MIGS-31.2     Sequencing coverage       285× Illumina
MIGS-30     Assemblers       with Allpaths, version r39750, Velvet 1.1.04
MIGS-32     Gene calling methods       Prodigal 1.4
     Genbank ID       ATYP00000000
     Genbank Date of Release       September 5, 2013
     GOLD ID       Gi08915
     GenBank ID       X67222
     Database: IMG-GEBA       2513237091
     Project relevance       Symbiotic N2 fixation, agriculture

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

strain RRI128 was cultured to mid logarithmic phase in 60 ml of TY rich medium on a gyratory shaker at 28°C [35]. DNA was isolated from the cells using a CTAB (Cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide) bacterial genomic DNA isolation method [36].

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome of strain RRI128 was sequenced at the Joint Genome Institute (JGI) using Illumina [37] technology. An Illumina standard shotgun library was constructed and sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform, which generated 13,085,546 reads totaling 1,962 Mb of Illumina data. All general aspects of library construction and sequencing performed at the JGI can be found at the JGI user home [36]. All raw Illumina sequence data was passed through DUK, a filtering program developed at JGI, which removes known Illumina sequencing and library preparation artifacts (Mingkun, L., Copeland, A. and Han, J., unpublished). The following steps were then performed for assembly: (1) filtered Illumina reads were assembled using Velvet [38], version 1.1.04, (2) 1–3 Kb simulated paired end reads were created from Velvet contigs using wgsim [39], (3) Illumina reads were assembled with simulated read pairs using Allpaths–LG [40] (version r39750). Velvet (Velvet optimizer params: --v --s 51 --e 71 --i 2 --t 1 --f "-shortPaired -fastq $FASTQ" --o "-ins_length 250 -min_contig_lgth 500") wgsim (-e 0 -1 76 -2 76 -r 0 -R 0 -X 0,) (3) Allpaths–LG (PrepareAllpathsInputs:PHRED64=1 PLOIDY=1 FRAGCOVERAGE=125 JUMPCOVERAGE=25 LONGJUMPCOV=50, RunAllpath-sLG: THREADS=8 RUN=stdshredpairs TARGETS=standard VAPIWARNONLY=True OVERWRITE=True). The final draft assembly contained 157 contigs in 156 scaffolds. The total size of the genome is 6.9 Mb and the final assembly is based on 1,962 Mb of Illumina data, which provides an average 285× coverage of the genome.

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using Prodigal [41] as part of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory genome annotation pipeline. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) non-redundant database, UniProt, TIGRFam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. These data sources were combined to assert a product description for each predicted protein. Non-coding genes and miscellaneous features were predicted using tRNAscan-SE [42] RNAMMer [43], Rfam [44], TMHMM [45], and SignalP [46]. Additional gene prediction analyses and functional annotation were performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes (IMG-ER) platform [47].

Genome properties

The genome is 6,900,273 nucleotides with 61.98% GC content (Table 4) and comprised of 156 scaffolds (Figures 3a,3b,3c,3d,3e). From a total of 6,770 genes, 6,683 were protein encoding and 87 RNA only encoding genes. The majority of genes (78.79%) were assigned a putative function whilst the remaining genes were annotated as hypothetical. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 5.
Table 4

Genome Statistics for strain RRI128

Attribute      Value     % of Total
Genome size (bp)      6,900,273     100.00
DNA coding region (bp)      5,931,611     85.96
DNA G+C content (bp)      4,276,906     61.98
Number of scaffolds      156
Number of contigs      157
Total gene      6,770     100.00
RNA genes      87     1.29
rRNA operons      1*
Protein-coding genes      6,683     98.71
Genes with function prediction      5,334     78.79
Genes assigned to COGs      5,314     78.49
Genes assigned Pfam domains      5,505     81.31
Genes with signal peptides      569     8.40
Genes with transmembrane helices      1,483     21.91
CRISPR repeats      0

*2 copies of 5S, 1 copy of 16S and 1 copy of 23S rRNA

Figure 3a

Graphical map of YU7DRAFT_scaffold_0.1 of the genome of strain RRI128. From bottom to the top of each scaffold: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories as denoted by the IMG platform), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, sRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Figure 3b

Graphical map of YU7DRAFT_scaffold_1.2 of the genome of strain RRI128. From bottom to the top of each scaffold: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories as denoted by the IMG platform), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, sRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Figure 3c

Graphical map of YU7DRAFT_scaffold_2.3 of the genome of strain RRI128. From bottom to the top of each scaffold: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories as denoted by the IMG platform), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, sRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Figure 3d

Graphical map of YU7DRAFT_scaffold_3.4 of the genome of strain RRI128. From bottom to the top of each scaffold: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories as denoted by the IMG platform), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, sRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Figure 3e

Graphical map of YU7DRAFT_scaffold_4.5 of the genome of strain RRI128. From bottom to the top of each scaffold: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories as denoted by the IMG platform), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, sRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Table 5

Number of protein coding genes of strain RRI128 associated with the general COG functional categories

Code    Value    %age    COG Category
J    202    3.41    Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
A    0    0.00    RNA processing and modification
K    520    8.78    Transcription
L    272    4.59    Replication, recombination and repair
B    2    0.03    Chromatin structure and dynamics
D    47    0.79    Cell cycle control, mitosis and meiosis
Y    0    0.00    Nuclear structure
V    61    1.03    Defense mechanisms
T    237    4.00    Signal transduction mechanisms
M    294    4.97    Cell wall/membrane biogenesis
N    75    1.27    Cell motility
Z    0    0.00    Cytoskeleton
W    1    0.02    Extracellular structures
U    116    1.96    Intracellular trafficking and secretion
O    186    3.14    Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C    355    6.00    Energy production conversion
G    594    10.03    Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E    673    11.37    Amino acid transport metabolism
F    108    1.82    Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H    197    3.33    Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I    216    3.65    Lipid transport and metabolism
P    306    5.17    Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q    168    2.84    Secondary metabolite biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R    705    11.91    General function prediction only
S    585    9.88    Function unknown
-    1,456    21.51    Not in COGS
*2 copies of 5S, 1 copy of 16S and 1 copy of 23S rRNA Graphical map of YU7DRAFT_scaffold_0.1 of the genome of strain RRI128. From bottom to the top of each scaffold: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories as denoted by the IMG platform), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, sRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew. Graphical map of YU7DRAFT_scaffold_1.2 of the genome of strain RRI128. From bottom to the top of each scaffold: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories as denoted by the IMG platform), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, sRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew. Graphical map of YU7DRAFT_scaffold_2.3 of the genome of strain RRI128. From bottom to the top of each scaffold: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories as denoted by the IMG platform), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, sRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew. Graphical map of YU7DRAFT_scaffold_3.4 of the genome of strain RRI128. From bottom to the top of each scaffold: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories as denoted by the IMG platform), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, sRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew. Graphical map of YU7DRAFT_scaffold_4.5 of the genome of strain RRI128. From bottom to the top of each scaffold: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories as denoted by the IMG platform), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, sRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.
  23 in total

1.  Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes.

Authors:  A Krogh; B Larsson; G von Heijne; E L Sonnhammer
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-01-19       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Rfam: an RNA family database.

Authors:  Sam Griffiths-Jones; Alex Bateman; Mhairi Marshall; Ajay Khanna; Sean R Eddy
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Solexa Ltd.

Authors:  Simon Bennett
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.533

4.  Improved prediction of signal peptides: SignalP 3.0.

Authors:  Jannick Dyrløv Bendtsen; Henrik Nielsen; Gunnar von Heijne; Søren Brunak
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2004-07-16       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  High-quality draft assemblies of mammalian genomes from massively parallel sequence data.

Authors:  Sante Gnerre; Iain Maccallum; Dariusz Przybylski; Filipe J Ribeiro; Joshua N Burton; Bruce J Walker; Ted Sharpe; Giles Hall; Terrance P Shea; Sean Sykes; Aaron M Berlin; Daniel Aird; Maura Costello; Riza Daza; Louise Williams; Robert Nicol; Andreas Gnirke; Chad Nusbaum; Eric S Lander; David B Jaffe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-12-27       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods.

Authors:  Koichiro Tamura; Daniel Peterson; Nicholas Peterson; Glen Stecher; Masatoshi Nei; Sudhir Kumar
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence.

Authors:  T M Lowe; S R Eddy
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1997-03-01       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Constructs for insertional mutagenesis, transcriptional signal localization and gene regulation studies in root nodule and other bacteria.

Authors:  Wayne G Reeve; Ravi P Tiwari; Penelope S Worsley; Michael J Dilworth; Andrew R Glenn; John G Howieson
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.777

9.  Rapid identification of Medicago nodulating strains by using two oligonucleotide probes complementary to 16S rDNA sequences.

Authors:  S Rome; J C Cleyet-Marel; L A Materon; P Normand; B Brunel
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.419

10.  The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification.

Authors:  Dawn Field; George Garrity; Tanya Gray; Norman Morrison; Jeremy Selengut; Peter Sterk; Tatiana Tatusova; Nicholas Thomson; Michael J Allen; Samuel V Angiuoli; Michael Ashburner; Nelson Axelrod; Sandra Baldauf; Stuart Ballard; Jeffrey Boore; Guy Cochrane; James Cole; Peter Dawyndt; Paul De Vos; Claude DePamphilis; Robert Edwards; Nadeem Faruque; Robert Feldman; Jack Gilbert; Paul Gilna; Frank Oliver Glöckner; Philip Goldstein; Robert Guralnick; Dan Haft; David Hancock; Henning Hermjakob; Christiane Hertz-Fowler; Phil Hugenholtz; Ian Joint; Leonid Kagan; Matthew Kane; Jessie Kennedy; George Kowalchuk; Renzo Kottmann; Eugene Kolker; Saul Kravitz; Nikos Kyrpides; Jim Leebens-Mack; Suzanna E Lewis; Kelvin Li; Allyson L Lister; Phillip Lord; Natalia Maltsev; Victor Markowitz; Jennifer Martiny; Barbara Methe; Ilene Mizrachi; Richard Moxon; Karen Nelson; Julian Parkhill; Lita Proctor; Owen White; Susanna-Assunta Sansone; Andrew Spiers; Robert Stevens; Paul Swift; Chris Taylor; Yoshio Tateno; Adrian Tett; Sarah Turner; David Ussery; Bob Vaughan; Naomi Ward; Trish Whetzel; Ingio San Gil; Gareth Wilson; Anil Wipat
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 54.908

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.