Literature DB >> 25197442

Genome sequence of the acid-tolerant Burkholderia sp. strain WSM2232 from Karijini National Park, Australia.

Robert Walker1, Elizabeth Watkin1, Rui Tian2, Lambert Bräu3, Graham O'Hara2, Lynne Goodwin4, James Han5, Tatiparthi Reddy5, Marcel Huntemann5, Amrita Pati5, Tanja Woyke5, Konstantinos Mavromatis5, Victor Markowitz6, Natalia Ivanova5, Nikos Kyrpides5, Wayne Reeve2.   

Abstract

Burkholderia sp. strain WSM2232 is an aerobic, motile, Gram-negative, non-spore-forming acid-tolerant rod that was trapped in 2001 from acidic soil collected from Karijini National Park (Australia) using Gastrolobium capitatum as a host. WSM2232 was effective in nitrogen fixation with G. capitatum but subsequently lost symbiotic competence during long-term storage. Here we describe the features of Burkholderia sp. strain WSM2232, together with genome sequence information and its annotation. The 7,208,311 bp standard-draft genome is arranged into 72 scaffolds of 72 contigs containing 6,322 protein-coding genes and 61 RNA-only encoding genes. The loss of symbiotic capability can now be attributed to the loss of nodulation and nitrogen fixation genes from the genome. This rhizobial genome is one of 100 sequenced as part of the DOE Joint Genome Institute 2010 Genomic Encyclopedia for Bacteria and Archaea-Root Nodule Bacteria (GEBA-RNB) project.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Betaproteobacteria; nitrogen fixation; rhizobia; root-nodule bacteria

Year:  2013        PMID: 25197442      PMCID: PMC4148988          DOI: 10.4056/sigs.5018795

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

spp. are a diverse group of organisms capable of thriving in diverse environments with many forming mutualistic associations with organisms such as fungi and plants [1]. The development in the 1960s and 1970s of a rational classification system for species resulted in proposals to give different generic names to taxonomically distinct groups. The organisms previously classified within rRNA similarity Group II were transferred into the new genus [2]. All described species at that time were phytopathogenic, or opportunistic mammalian pathogens with the type species becoming a growing community health concern in immunocompromised and cystic fibrosis patients [3-5]. With the isolation of more spp., it has become apparent that the genus is a far more complex mix, with the isolation of numerous soil-inhabiting species capable of degrading heavy metals and environmental contaminants [6,7]. Further reports identified plant growth promoting (PGP) species and legume microsymbionts. This led to a paradigm shift in rhizobiology and resulted in numerous new novel spp. descriptions [8-10]. Most PGP, or legume microsymbiont species of have been isolated in South America from Mimosa spp. or South Africa from Papilionoideae legumes and until recently, was the only described PGP bacterial species isolated from Australia in the maize rhizosphere [11]. Australian have been isolated as nodule occupants from some Acacia spp., [12] however none have been authenticated or tested for the nodulation of other legumes. There is little data regarding the symbiosis between and legumes in Australia compared to South Africa and South America. WSM2232 was trapped from acidic soil (pHCaCl2 4.8) collected from Karijini National Park (Western Australia) using Gastrolobium capitatum as a host. Sites where the soil pH was higher (pHCaCl2 >7) did not contain any symbionts but did contain numerous and spp. (Watkin, unpublished). Soil pH is an edaphic variable that controls microbial biogeography [13] and the acid tolerance of has been shown to account for the biogeographical distribution of this genus [14]. The symbiotic capacity of WSM2232 was authenticated in axenic glasshouse trials using inoculation of G. capitatum grown in nitrogen free conditions. Inoculated plants nodulated by WSM2232 produced significantly greater mass than uninoculated controls. WSM2232 was subcultured and placed in long-term storage in frozen laboratory glycerol stocks. Isolate revival and inoculation onto endemic Australian legumes failed to elicit a symbiotic response. The reason for the loss of the symbiotic phenotype has, until now, not been identified. The genome of strain WSM2232 is one of two Australian genomes (the other being that of WSM2230 (GOLD ID Gi08831)) that have now been sequenced through the Genomic Encyclopedia for Bacteria and Archaea-Root Nodule Bacteria (GEBA-RNB) program. Here we present a preliminary description of the general features of WSM2232 together with its genome sequence and annotation. The absence of nodulation genes within this genome explains the nodulation minus symbiotic phenotype of the laboratory cultured strain. The genomes of WSM2232 and WSM2230 will be an important resource to identify the processes enabling such isolates to adapt to the infertile, highly acidic soils that dominate the Australian landscape.

Classification and features

strain WSM2232 is a motile, non-sporulating, non-encapsulated, Gram-negative rod in the order of the class . The rod-shaped form varies in size with dimensions of 0.25-0.5 μm for width and 0.5-2.0 μm for length (Figure 1A and 1B).
Figure 1

Images of strain WSM2232using scanning (A) and transmission (B) electron microscopy.

Images of strain WSM2232using scanning (A) and transmission (B) electron microscopy. It is fast growing, forming colonies within 1-2 days when grown on LB agar [15] devoid of NaCl and within 3-4 days when grown on half strength Lupin Agar (½LA) [16], tryptone-yeast extract agar (TY) [17] or a modified yeast-mannitol agar (YMA) [18] at 28°C. Colonies on ½LA are opaque, slightly domed and moderately mucoid with smooth margins. WSM2232 falls into a large clade containing PGP, bioremediation and legume microsymbiont species, and WSM2232 demonstrates PGP phenotypes including phosphate solubilization and hydroxamate-like siderophore production and is acid tolerant with growth in the pH range of 4.5-9.0 (Walker, unpublished). Minimum Information about the Genome Sequence (MIGS) is provided in Table 1. Figure 2 shows the phylogenetic neighborhood of strain WSM2232 in a 16S rRNA sequence based tree. This strain shares 99% (1352/1364 bp) sequence identity to the 16S rRNA gene of the sequenced strain WSM2230 (Gi08831).
Table 1

Classification and general features of strain WSM2232 according to the MIGS recommendations [19]

MIGS IDProperty   Term    Evidence code
Current classification   Domain Bacteria    TAS [20]
   Phylum Proteobacteria    TAS [21]
   Class Betaproteobacteria    TAS [22,23]
   Order Burkholderiales    TAS [23,24]
   Family Burkholderiaceae    TAS [23,25]
   Genus Burkholderia    TAS [2,26,27]
   Species Burkholderia sp.    IDA
   Strain WSM2232    IDA
Gram stain   Negative    IDA
Cell shape   Rod    IDA
Motility   Motile    IDA
Sporulation   Non-sporulating    NAS
Temperature range   Mesophile    IDA
Optimum temperature   30°C    IDA
Salinity   Non-halophile    IDA
MIGS-22Oxygen requirement   Aerobic    IDA
Carbon source   Varied    IDA
Energy source   Chemoorganotroph    NAS
MIGS-6Habitat   Soil, root nodule, on host    IDA
MIGS-15Biotic relationship   Free living, symbiotic    IDA
MIGS-14Pathogenicity   Non-pathogenic    IDA
Biosafety level   1    TAS
Isolation   Root nodule of Gastrolobium capitatum    IDA
MIGS-4Geographic location   Karijini National Park, Australia    IDA
MIGS-5Soil collection date   September, 2001    IDA
MIGS-4.1MIGS-4.2LatitudeLongitude   117.99   -22.45    IDA    IDA
MIGS-4.3Depth   0-10 cm    IDA
MIGS-4.4Altitude   Not recorded    IDA

Evidence codes – IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay; TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [28].

Figure 2

Phylogenetic tree showing the relationship of strain WSM2232 (shown in bold print) to other members of the order based on aligned sequences of the 16S rRNA gene (1,242 bp internal region). All sites were informative and there were no gap-containing sites. Phylogenetic analyses were performed using MEGA [29], version 5. The tree was built using the Maximum-Likelihood method with the General Time Reversible model [30]. Bootstrap analysis [31] with 500 replicates was performed to assess the support for the clusters. Type strains are indicated with a superscript T. Brackets after the strain name contain a DNA database accession number and/or a GOLD ID (beginning with the prefix G) for a sequencing project registered in GOLD [32]. Published genomes are indicated with an asterisk.

Evidence codes – IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay; TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [28]. Phylogenetic tree showing the relationship of strain WSM2232 (shown in bold print) to other members of the order based on aligned sequences of the 16S rRNA gene (1,242 bp internal region). All sites were informative and there were no gap-containing sites. Phylogenetic analyses were performed using MEGA [29], version 5. The tree was built using the Maximum-Likelihood method with the General Time Reversible model [30]. Bootstrap analysis [31] with 500 replicates was performed to assess the support for the clusters. Type strains are indicated with a superscript T. Brackets after the strain name contain a DNA database accession number and/or a GOLD ID (beginning with the prefix G) for a sequencing project registered in GOLD [32]. Published genomes are indicated with an asterisk.

Symbiotaxonomy

WSM2232 formed nodules (Nod+) and fixed N2 (Fix+) with G. capitatum when first isolated and was Nod- on various other Australian legumes and Mimosa pudica (Table 2). However, after long-term storage and subsequent culture, it failed to effectively nodulate G. capitatum.
Table 2

Compatibility of WSM2232 with nine legume species for nodulation (Nod) and N2-Fixation (Fix).

Species Name  Common Name   Growth TypeNodFix  Reference
Gastrolobium capitatum  Bitter Pea   Perennial+1+1  IDA
-2-2  IDA
Kennedia coccinea  Coral Vine   Perennial--  IDA
Swainsona formosa  Sturts Desert Pea   Annual--  IDA
Indigofera trita  -   Annual--  IDA
Oxylobium robustum  Shaggy Pea   Perennial--  IDA
Acacia acuminata  Jam Wattle   Perennial--  IDA
Acacia paraneura  Weeping Mulga   Perennial--  IDA
Acacia stenophylla  -   Perennial--  IDA
Mimosa pudica  Sensitive Plant   Perennial--  IDA

1 result obtained from trapping experiment

2 authentication result following long-term storage

IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay from http://www.geneontology.org/GO.evidence.shtml of the Gene Ontology project [28].

1 result obtained from trapping experiment 2 authentication result following long-term storage IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay from http://www.geneontology.org/GO.evidence.shtml of the Gene Ontology project [28].

Phenotype Microarray

Strain WSM2232 was assayed using the Biolog Phenotype Microarray® plates (PM1 to 3) system testing 190 carbon and 95 nitrogen compounds. Plates were purchased from Biolog and tests were carried out per manufacturer’s instructions. The irreversible reduction of tetrazolium dye to formazan is used in this system to report on active metabolism [33]. The results obtained from the colorimetric assay are shown in Table 3.
Table 3

Reduction of tetrazolium dye by NADH produced by respiring cells of WSM2232 in the Biolog Phenotype Microarray

PM1 plateCompound  PM2 plate  Compound   PM3 plate   Compound
L-Arabinose+  Chondroitin Sulfate C-   Ammonia+
N-Acetyl-D Glucosamine+  α-Cyclodextrin-   Nitrite+
D-Saccharic Acid+  β-Cyclodextrin-   Nitrate+
Succinic Acid+  γ-Cyclodextrin-   Urea+
D-Galactose+  Dextrin+   Biuret-
L-Aspartic Acid+  Gelatin-   L-Alanine+
L-Proline+  Glycogen-   L-Arginine+
D-Alanine+  Inulin-   L-Asparagine+
D-Trehalose+  Laminarin-   L-Aspartic Acid+
D-Mannose+  Mannan-   L-Cysteine+
Dulcitol+  Pectin-   L-Glutamic Acid+
D-Serine-  N-Acetyl-D-Galactosamine+   L-Glutamine+
D-Sorbitol+  N-Acetyl-Neuraminic Acid-   Glycine+
Glycerol+  β-D-Allose-   L-Histidine+
L-Fucose+  Amygdalin-   L-Isoleucine+
D-Glucuronic Acid+  D-Arabinose+   L-Leucine+
D-Gluconic Acid+  D-Arabitol+   L-Lysine+
D,L-α-Glycerol-Phosphate+  L-Arabitol+   L-Methionine+
D-Xylose+  Arbutin-   L-Phenylalanine+
L-Lactic Acid+  2-Deoxy-D-Ribose+   L-Proline+
Formic Acid+  I-Erythritol-   L-Serine+
D-Mannitol+  D-Fucose+   L-Threonine+
L-Glutamic Acid+  3-0-β-D-Galacto-pyranosyl-DArabinose-   L-Tryptophan+
D-Glucose-6-Phosphate+  Gentiobiose-   L-Tyrosine+
D-Galactonic Acid-γ-Lactone+  L-Glucose-   L-Valine+
D,L-Malic Acid+  Lactitol-   D-Alanine+
D-Ribose+  D-Melezitose-   D-Asparagine+
Tween 20+  Maltitol-   D-Aspartic Acid+
L-Rhamnose+  α-Methyl-D-Glucoside-   D-Glutamic Acid+
D-Fructose+  β-Methyl-D-Galactoside+   D-Lysine+
Acetic Acid+  3-Methyl Glucose-   D-Serine+
α-D-Glucose+  β-Methyl-D-Glucuronic Acid-   D-Valine+
Maltose-  α-Methyl-D-Mannoside-   L-Citrulline+
D-Melibiose-  β-Methyl-D-Xyloside-   L-Homoserine+
Thymidine-  Palatinose-   L-Ornithine+
L-Asparagine+  D-Raffinose-   N-Acetyl-D,L-Glutamic Acid+
D-Aspartic Acid-  Salicin-   N-Phthaloyl-L-Glutamic Acid-
D-Glucosaminic Acid+  Sedoheptulosan-   L-Pyroglutamic Acid+
1,2-Propanediol-  L-Sorbose-   Hydroxylamine+
Tween 40+  Stachyose-   Methylamine+
α-Keto-Glutaric Acid+  D-Tagatose+   N-Amylamine+
α-Keto-Butyric Acid+  Turanose+   N-Butylamine+
α-Methyl-D-Galactoside-  Xylitol+   Ethylamine-
α-D-Lactose-  N-Acetyl-D-Glucosaminitol+   Ethanolamine+
Lactulose+  γ-Amino Butyric Acid+   Ethylenediamine-
Sucrose-  δ-Amino Valeric Acid+   Putrescine+
Uridine+  Butyric Acid+   Agmatine-
L-Glutamine+  Capric Acid-   Histamine-
M-Tartaric Acid+  Caproic Acid+   β-Phenylethylamine+
D-Glucose-1-Phosphate+  Citraconic Acid+   Tyramine-
D-Fructose-6-Phosphate+  Citramalic Acid+   Acetamide+
Tween 80+  D-Glucosamine+   Formamide+
α-Hydroxy Glutaric Acid-γ-Lactone-  2-Hydroxy Benzoic Acid-   Glucuronamide+
α-Hydroxy Butyric Acid+  4-Hydroxy Benzoic Acid+   D,L-Lactamide+
β-Methyl-D-Glucoside-  β-Hydroxy Butyric Acid+   D-Glucosamine+
Adonitol+  γ-Hydroxy Butyric Acid+   DGalactosamine+
Maltotriose-  α-Keto Valeric Acid-   DMannosamine+
2-Deoxy Adenosine-  Itaconic Acid-   N-Acetyl-D-Glucosamine+
Adenosine+  5-Keto-D-Gluconic Acid-   N-Acetyl-D-Galactosamine-
Glycy-L-Aspartic Acid+  D-Lactic Acid Methyl Ester+   N-Acetyl-D-Mannosamine-
Citric Acid+  Malonic Acid+   Adenine+
M-Inositol+  Melibionic Acid+   Adenosine+
D-Threonine-  Oxalic Acid+   Cytidine+
Fumaric Acid+  Oxalomalic Acid+   Cytosine+
Bromo Succinic Acid+  Quinic Acid+   Guanine-
Propionic Acid+  D-Ribono-1,4-Lactone-   Guanosine+
Mucic Acid+  Sebacic Acid+   Thymine+
Glycolic Acid-  Sorbic Acid+   Thymidine-
Glyoxylic Acid+  Succinamic Acid+   Uracil+
D-Cellobiose-  D-Tartaric Acid+   Uridine+
Inosine+  L-Tartari c Acid+   Inosine+
Glycyl-L-Glutamic Acid+  Acetamide-   Xanthine+
Tricarballylic Acid+  L-Alaninamide+   Xanthosine+
L-Serine+  N-Acetyl-L-Glutamic Acid+   Uric Acid+
L-Threonine+  L-Arginine+   Alloxan+
L-Alanine+  Glycine-   Allantoin+
L-Allnyl-Glycine+  L-Histidine+   Parabanic Acid+
Acetoacetic Acid+  L-Homoserine+   D,L-α-Amino-N-Butyric Acid+
N-Acetyl-β-D-Mannosamine-  Hydroxy-L-Proline+   γ-Amino-N-Butyric Acid+
Mono Methyl Succinate+  L-Isoleucine+   ε-Amino-N-Caproic Acid-
Methyl Pyruvate+  L-Leucine+   D,L-α-Amino-Caprylic Acid-
D-Malic Acid+  L-Lysine+   δ-Amino-N-Valeric Acid+
L-Malic Acid+  L-Methionine-   α-Amino-N-Valeric Acid+
Glycyl-L-Proline+  L-Ornithine+   Ala-Asp+
p-Hydroxy Phenyl Acetic Acid+  L-Phenylalanine+   Ala-Gln+
m-Hydroxy Phenyl Acetic Acid-  L-Pyroglutamic Acid+   Ala-Glu+
Tyramine-  L-Valine+   Ala-Gly+
D-Psicose-  D,L-Carnitine+   Ala-His+
L-Lyxose+  Sec-Butylamine-   Ala-Leu+
Glucuronamide-  D,L-Octopamine-   Ala-Thr+
Pyruvic Acid+  Putrescine-   Gly-Asn+
L-Galactonic Acid-γ-Lactone+  Dihydroxy Acetone-   Gly-Gln+
D-Galacturonic Acid+  2,3-Butanediol+   Gly-Glu+
Phenylethylamine+  2,3-Butanone+   Gly-Met+
2-Aminoethanol+  3-Hydrox y-2-Butanone-   Met-Ala+

Genome sequencing and annotation information

Genome project history

This organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of its environmental and agricultural relevance to issues in global carbon cycling, alternative energy production, and biogeochemical importance, and is part of the Community Sequencing Program at the U.S. Department of Energy, Joint Genome Institute (JGI) for projects of relevance to agency missions. The genome project is deposited in the Genomes OnLine Database [32] and a standard-draft genome sequence in IMG. Sequencing, finishing and annotation were performed by the JGI. A summary of the project information is shown in Table 4.
Table 4

Genome sequencing project information for WSM2232.

MIGS ID   Property   Term
MIGS-31   Finishing quality   Standard draft
MIGS-28   Libraries used   One Illumina fragment library
MIGS-29   Sequencing platforms   Illumina HiSeq 2000
MIGS-31.2   Sequencing coverage   Illumina: 255×
MIGS-30   Assemblers   Velvet version 1.1.04; Allpaths-LG version r37348
MIGS-32   Gene calling methods   Prodigal 1.4
   GOLD ID   Gi08832a
   NCBI project ID   182741
   Database: IMG   2508501125b
   Project relevance   Symbiotic N2 fixation, agriculture

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

strain WSM2232 was cultured to mid logarithmic phase in 60 ml of TY rich medium on a gyratory shaker at 28°C [34]. DNA was isolated from the cells using a CTAB (Cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide) bacterial genomic DNA isolation method (http://my.jgi.doe.gov/general/index.html).

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome of strain WSM2232 was sequenced at the Joint Genome Institute (JGI) using Illumina technology [35]. An Illumina standard shotgun library was constructed and sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform, which generated 12,244,888, reads totaling 1,837 Mbp. All general aspects of library construction and sequencing performed at the JGI can be found at http://my.jgi.doe.gov/general/index.html. All raw Illumina sequence data was passed through DUK, a filtering program developed at JGI, which removes known Illumina sequencing and library preparation artifacts (Mingkun, L., Copeland, A. and Han, J., unpublished). The following steps were then performed for assembly: Filtered Illumina reads were assembled using Velvet [36] (version 1.1.04) 1–3 Kbp simulated paired end reads were created from Velvet contigs using wgsim (https://github.com/lh3/wgsim) Illumina reads were assembled with simulated read pairs using Allpaths–LG [37] (version r37348). Parameters for assembly steps were: Velvet --v --s 51 --e 71 --i 2 --t 1 --f "-shortPaired -fastq $FASTQ" --o "-ins_length 250 -min_contig_lgth 500") wgsim (-e 0 -1 76 -2 76 -r 0 -R 0 -X 0) Allpaths–LG (STD_1,project,assembly,fragment,1,200,35,,,inward,0,0 SIMREADS,project,assembly,jumping,1,,,3000,300,inward,0,0). The final draft assembly contained 72 contigs in 72 scaffolds. The total size of the genome is 7.2 Mbp and the final assembly is based on 1,837 Mbp of Illumina data, which provides an average 255× coverage of the genome.

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using Prodigal [38] as part of the DOE-JGI annotation pipeline [39], followed by a round of manual curation using the JGI GenePrimp pipeline [40]. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nonredundant database, UniProt, TIGRFam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. The tRNAScanSE tool [41] was used to find tRNA genes, whereas ribosomal RNA genes were found by searches against models of the ribosomal RNA genes built from SILVA [42]. Other non–coding RNAs such as the RNA components of the protein secretion complex and the RNase P were identified by searching the genome for the corresponding Rfam profiles using INFERNAL (http://infernal.janelia.org). Additional gene prediction analysis and manual functional annotation was performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes (IMG-ER) platform (http://img.jgi.doe.gov/er) [43].

Genome properties

The genome is 7,208,311 nucleotides 63.11% GC content (Table 5) and comprised of 72 scaffolds (Figure 3) of 72 contigs. From a total of 6,383 genes, 6,322 were protein encoding and 61 RNA only encoding genes. The majority of genes (80.90%) were assigned a putative function whilst the remaining genes were annotated as hypothetical. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 6.
Table 5

Genome Statistics for strain WSM2232

Attribute   Value   % of Total
Genome size (bp)   7,208,311   100.00
DNA coding region (bp)   6,203,174   86.06
DNA G+C content (bp)   4,548,885   63.11
Number of scaffolds   72
Number of contigs   72
Total gene   6,383   100.00
RNA genes   61   0.96
rRNA operons*   1   0.02
Protein-coding genes   6,322   99.04
Genes with function prediction   5,164   80.90
Genes assigned to COGs   5,151   80.70
Genes assigned Pfam domains   5,425   84.99
Genes with signal peptides   645   10.10
Genes with transmembrane helices   1,497   23.45
CRISPR repeats   1

*4 copies of 5S, 2 copies of 16S and 1 copy of 23S rRNA.

Figure 3

Graphical map of the four largest scaffolds genome for the genome of strain WSM2232. From bottom to the top of each scaffold: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories as denoted by the IMG platform), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, sRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Table 6

Number of protein coding genes of strain WSM2232 associated with the general COG functional categories.

CodeValue%age  Description
J4748.15  Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
A30.05  RNA processing and modification
K1512.60  Replication, recombination and repair
L5599.61  Transcription
B10.0  Chromatin structure and dynamics
D420.72  Cell cycle control, cell division and chromosome partioning
Y00.0  Nuclear structure
V00.0  Defense mechcanism
T3185.47  Signal transduction mechanisms
M3716.38  Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis
N1252.15  Cell motility
Z00.00  Cytoskeleton
W20.03  Extracellular structures
U1542.65  Intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport
O1833.15  Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C3846.60  Energy production conversion
G1943.34  Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
E5699.79  Amino acid transport and metabolism
F1001.72  Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H2133.66  Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I2774.76  Lipid transport and metabolism
P2694.63  Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q1993.42  Secondary metabolite biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R67311.58  General function prediction only
S5008.60  Function unknown
-1,23219.30  Not in COGs
*4 copies of 5S, 2 copies of 16S and 1 copy of 23S rRNA. Graphical map of the four largest scaffolds genome for the genome of strain WSM2232. From bottom to the top of each scaffold: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories as denoted by the IMG platform), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, sRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew. Acknowledgements
  32 in total

1.  GenePRIMP: a gene prediction improvement pipeline for prokaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Amrita Pati; Natalia N Ivanova; Natalia Mikhailova; Galina Ovchinnikova; Sean D Hooper; Athanasios Lykidis; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-05-02       Impact factor: 28.547

2.  Burkholderia caribensis sp. nov., an exopolysaccharide-producing bacterium isolated from vertisol microaggregates in Martinique.

Authors:  W Achouak; R Christen; M Barakat; M H Martel; T Heulin
Journal:  Int J Syst Bacteriol       Date:  1999-04

3.  List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.747

4.  Phenotype microarrays for high-throughput phenotypic testing and assay of gene function.

Authors:  B R Bochner; P Gadzinski; E Panomitros
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Insights into the history of the legume-betaproteobacterial symbiosis.

Authors:  Annette A Angus; Ann M Hirsch
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 6.185

6.  MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods.

Authors:  Koichiro Tamura; Daniel Peterson; Nicholas Peterson; Glen Stecher; Masatoshi Nei; Sudhir Kumar
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence.

Authors:  T M Lowe; S R Eddy
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1997-03-01       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Constructs for insertional mutagenesis, transcriptional signal localization and gene regulation studies in root nodule and other bacteria.

Authors:  Wayne G Reeve; Ravi P Tiwari; Penelope S Worsley; Michael J Dilworth; Andrew R Glenn; John G Howieson
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.777

9.  Proof that Burkholderia strains form effective symbioses with legumes: a study of novel Mimosa-nodulating strains from South America.

Authors:  Wen-Ming Chen; Sergio M de Faria; Rosângela Straliotto; Rosa M Pitard; Jean L Simões-Araùjo; Jui-Hsing Chou; Yi-Ju Chou; Edmundo Barrios; Alan R Prescott; Geoffrey N Elliott; Janet I Sprent; J Peter W Young; Euan K James
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Occurrence of multiple genomovars of Burkholderia cepacia in cystic fibrosis patients and proposal of Burkholderia multivorans sp. nov.

Authors:  P Vandamme; B Holmes; M Vancanneyt; T Coenye; B Hoste; R Coopman; H Revets; S Lauwers; M Gillis; K Kersters; J R Govan
Journal:  Int J Syst Bacteriol       Date:  1997-10
View more
  1 in total

1.  Draft genome of Paraburkholderia caballeronis TNe-841T, a free-living, nitrogen-fixing, tomato plant-associated bacterium.

Authors:  Fernando Uriel Rojas-Rojas; Erika Yanet Tapia-García; Maskit Maymon; Ethan Humm; Marcel Huntemann; Alicia Clum; Manoj Pillay; Krishnaveni Palaniappan; Neha Varghese; Natalia Mikhailova; Dimitrios Stamatis; T B K Reddy; Victor Markowitz; Natalia Ivanova; Nikos Kyrpides; Tanja Woyke; Nicole Shapiro; Ann M Hirsch; Paulina Estrada-de Los Santos
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2017-12-16
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.