Daniel Kaemmerer1, Maria Athelogou2, Amelie Lupp3, Isabell Lenhardt3, Stefan Schulz3, Peter Luisa1, Merten Hommann1, Vikas Prasad4, Gerd Binnig5, Richard Paul Baum2. 1. Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Zentralklinik Bad Berka Bad Berka, Germany. 2. Department of Molecular Radiotherapy and Molecular Imaging, Center for PET, Zentralklinik Bad Berka Bad Berka, Germany. 3. Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jena University Hospital Jena, Germany. 4. Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Charité Berlin Germany ; Department of Molecular Radiotherapy and Molecular Imaging, Center for PET, Zentralklinik Bad Berka Bad Berka, Germany. 5. Definiens AG Munich, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Manual evaluation of somatostatin receptor (SSTR) immunohistochemistry (IHC) is a time-consuming and cost-intensive procedure. Aim of the study was to compare manual evaluation of SSTR subtype IHC to an automated software-based analysis, and to in-vivo imaging by SSTR-based PET/CT. METHODS: We examined 25 gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (GEP-NET) patients and correlated their in-vivo SSTR-PET/CT data (determined by the standardized uptake values SUVmax,-mean) with the corresponding ex-vivo IHC data of SSTR subtype (1, 2A, 4, 5) expression. Exactly the same lesions were imaged by PET/CT, resected and analyzed by IHC in each patient. After manual evaluation, the IHC slides were digitized and automatically evaluated for SSTR expression by Definiens XD software. A virtual IHC score "BB1" was created for comparing the manual and automated analysis of SSTR expression. RESULTS: BB1 showed a significant correlation with the corresponding conventionally determined Her2/neu score of the SSTR-subtypes 2A (rs: 0.57), 4 (rs: 0.44) and 5 (rs: 0.43). BB1 of SSTR2A also significantly correlated with the SUVmax (rs: 0.41) and the SUVmean (rs: 0.50). Likewise, a significant correlation was seen between the conventionally evaluated SSTR2A status and the SUVmax (rs: 0.42) and SUVmean (rs: 0.62). CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate that the evaluation of the SSTR status by automated analysis (BB1 score), using digitized histopathology slides ("virtual microscopy"), corresponds well with the SSTR2A, 4 and 5 expression as determined by conventional manual histopathology. The BB1 score also exhibited a significant association to the SSTR-PET/CT data in accordance with the high affinity profile of the SSTR analogues used for imaging.
BACKGROUND: Manual evaluation of somatostatin receptor (SSTR) immunohistochemistry (IHC) is a time-consuming and cost-intensive procedure. Aim of the study was to compare manual evaluation of SSTR subtype IHC to an automated software-based analysis, and to in-vivo imaging by SSTR-based PET/CT. METHODS: We examined 25 gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (GEP-NET) patients and correlated their in-vivo SSTR-PET/CT data (determined by the standardized uptake values SUVmax,-mean) with the corresponding ex-vivo IHC data of SSTR subtype (1, 2A, 4, 5) expression. Exactly the same lesions were imaged by PET/CT, resected and analyzed by IHC in each patient. After manual evaluation, the IHC slides were digitized and automatically evaluated for SSTR expression by Definiens XD software. A virtual IHC score "BB1" was created for comparing the manual and automated analysis of SSTR expression. RESULTS:BB1 showed a significant correlation with the corresponding conventionally determined Her2/neu score of the SSTR-subtypes 2A (rs: 0.57), 4 (rs: 0.44) and 5 (rs: 0.43). BB1 of SSTR2A also significantly correlated with the SUVmax (rs: 0.41) and the SUVmean (rs: 0.50). Likewise, a significant correlation was seen between the conventionally evaluated SSTR2A status and the SUVmax (rs: 0.42) and SUVmean (rs: 0.62). CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate that the evaluation of the SSTR status by automated analysis (BB1 score), using digitized histopathology slides ("virtual microscopy"), corresponds well with the SSTR2A, 4 and 5 expression as determined by conventional manual histopathology. The BB1 score also exhibited a significant association to the SSTR-PET/CT data in accordance with the high affinity profile of the SSTR analogues used for imaging.
Authors: Benny K Abraham; Peter Fritz; Monika McClellan; Petra Hauptvogel; Maria Athelogou; Hiltrud Brauch Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2005-02-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Zhi Rong Qian; Tingting Li; Monica Ter-Minassian; Juhong Yang; Jennifer A Chan; Lauren K Brais; Yohei Masugi; Arunthathi Thiaglingam; Nichole Brooks; Reiko Nishihara; Mireille Bonnemarie; Atsuhiro Masuda; Kentaro Inamura; Sun A Kim; Kosuke Mima; Yasutaka Sukawa; Ruoxu Dou; Xihong Lin; David C Christiani; Fabien Schmidlin; Charles S Fuchs; Umar Mahmood; Shuji Ogino; Matthew H Kulke Journal: Pancreas Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 3.327
Authors: Ronald Walker; Stephen Deppen; Gary Smith; Chanjuan Shi; Jonathan Lehman; Jeff Clanton; Brandon Moore; Rena Burns; Eric L Grogan; Pierre P Massion Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-02-09 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Nina Ionovici; Mara Carsote; Dana Cristina Terzea; Anca Mihaela Predescu; Anne Marie Rauten; Mihaela Popescu Journal: Rom J Morphol Embryol Date: 2020 Apr-Jun Impact factor: 1.033
Authors: Marie Gerisch; Jan Smettan; Sabine Ebert; Maria Athelogou; Beate Brand-Saberi; Nick Spindler; Wolf C Mueller; Shibashish Giri; Augustinus Bader Journal: Front Genet Date: 2018-03-06 Impact factor: 4.599