Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) were first described by Clark and Mazur in 1983 for smooth muscle neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract differentiating them from leiomyoma, leiomyosarcomas and neurogenic tumors. GISTs can arise from the bowel, peritoneum, omentum or retroperitoneum. This article reviews the computed tomography imaging features of primary GISTs, response to treatment and highlights data on predicting the outcome to chemotherapeutic drugs on imaging.
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) were first described by Clark and Mazur in 1983 for smooth muscle neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract differentiating them from leiomyoma, leiomyosarcomas and neurogenic tumors. GISTs can arise from the bowel, peritoneum, omentum or retroperitoneum. This article reviews the computed tomography imaging features of primary GISTs, response to treatment and highlights data on predicting the outcome to chemotherapeutic drugs on imaging.
Entities:
Keywords:
Bowel; exophytic; gastrointestinal stromal tumor; mass
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are special group of tumors arising from interstitial cells of Cajal, that express a tyrosine kinase growth factor receptor, also called KIT protein-CD117 and CD34 found in chromosome 4. The expression of this unique protein allows unchecked growth of tumor, which is also resistance to apoptosis. These tumors are different from leiomyoma, leiomyoblastoma and leiomyosarcomas. Before 1983, GISTs were misdiagnosed as smooth muscle tumors because on light microscopy these tumors share many features.
DISCUSSION
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors most affects people of age group 40-70 years old. Male to female incidence is now considered to be equal. Statistically, between 5000 and 10,000 people develop this tumor worldwide with nearly 1000-2000 new cases/year in the United States. GISTs accounts for 1-3% of all gastrointestinal tumors. GISTs can involve the gastrointestinal tract anywhere from esophagus to anus — stomach (37-70%), small bowel (20-33%), duodenum (9%), anorectum (5-7%), colon (4%) and esophagus (<2%) [Figures 1-5].[1] Other atypical locations are omentum, mesentery and retroperitoneum [Figures 6-8].[2] The histologic classification is based on the predominant cell type — spindle cell, epithelioid cell or mixed cell type. The spindle cell type accounts for about 75% of GISTs and is also the most common type of GIST at other sites.
Figure 1
Malignant stomach gastrointestinal stromal tumors in a 27-year-old female — axial contrast-enhanced computed tomography image showing large predominantly exophytic mass lesion arising from stomach (arrowhead) with multiple hypodense liver metastasis (arrows)
Figure 5
Rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors in a 49-year-old male — (a) barium enema spot image lateral view showing extrinsic impression on rectal wall (arrowhead) (b) axial contrast-enhanced computed tomography image showing heterogenously enhancing necrotic mass in pelvis (black arrowhead) displacing the urinary bladder (arrow) anteriorly
Figure 6
Omental gastrointestinal stromal tumors in a 44-year-old male — axial contrast-enhanced computed tomography image showing well-defined homogenously enhancing mass (arrow) in the omentum displacing the bowel loops
Figure 8
Retroperitoneal gastrointestinal stromal tumors in 40-year-old male — axial contrast-enhanced computed tomography image showing large heterogeneously enhancing necrotic mass lesion (arrowhead) in the retroperitoneum with peritoneal deposits (arrow)
Malignant stomach gastrointestinal stromal tumors in a 27-year-old female — axial contrast-enhanced computed tomography image showing large predominantly exophytic mass lesion arising from stomach (arrowhead) with multiple hypodense liver metastasis (arrows)Ileal gastrointestinal stromal tumor in a 45-year-old male — axial contrast-enhanced computed tomography image showing heterogeneously enhancing exophytic mass lesion (black arrowhead) arising from ileal loop causing mild aneurysmal dilatation (white arrowhead)Duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors in a 45-year-old male — (a) barium meal follow through spot image showing widening of C-loop of duodenum with mucosal irregularity (arrowhead) and ulcerations (b) coronal contrast-enhanced computed tomography image showing heterogeneously enhancing mass lesion in second part of duodenum (white arrowhead) having intraluminal as well as subserosal component without proximal obstructionRectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors in a 50-year-old female contrast-enhanced computed tomography showing heterogeneously enhancing exophytic mass lesion arising from the rectal wall (arrowhead)Rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors in a 49-year-old male — (a) barium enema spot image lateral view showing extrinsic impression on rectal wall (arrowhead) (b) axial contrast-enhanced computed tomography image showing heterogenously enhancing necrotic mass in pelvis (black arrowhead) displacing the urinary bladder (arrow) anteriorlyOmental gastrointestinal stromal tumors in a 44-year-old male — axial contrast-enhanced computed tomography image showing well-defined homogenously enhancing mass (arrow) in the omentum displacing the bowel loopsPeritoneal gastrointestinal stromal tumors in a 40-yearold male — axial contrast-enhanced computed tomography image showing large heterogeneously enhancing mass lesion (arrowhead) with necrosis in the peritoneal cavityRetroperitoneal gastrointestinal stromal tumors in 40-year-old male — axial contrast-enhanced computed tomography image showing large heterogeneously enhancing necrotic mass lesion (arrowhead) in the retroperitoneum with peritoneal deposits (arrow)On imaging, GISTs may be submucosal, intramural or subserosal. Findings on barium studies are often subtle than seen on computed tomography (CT) as majority of them are exophytic in nature. On CT, small GISTs are usually well-defined, solid mass showing homogenous enhancement [Figure 9]. Calcifications may occasionally be present. Large tumors show areas of hemorrhage, cystic/necrotic areas and heterogeneous enhancement. Neovascularity may be seen within the tumor after contrast administration [Figure 10]. Thrombosis of mesenteric vessels is uncommon. Rarely, these tumors may be entirely cystic [Figure 11]. Cavitory nature with air and contrast within the mass is suggestive of mucosal ulceration with fistulous communication of necrotic cavity with the bowel lumen [Figure 12].[34] Collection of air in the nondependent aspect of larger cavitating tumors with necrosis is known as the “Toricelli-Bernouilli” crescentic necrosis sign [Figure 13].[5] Uncommon features with GIST are presence of ascites, lymphadenopathy, intestinal obstruction and metastases in lungs [Figure 14]. Crucial role lies in differentiation of benign versus malignant GISTs. Features associated with poor prognosis include distal location, size and high mitotic activity with the exception of esophageal GISTs.[6] Benign lesions are usually <2 cm, whereas malignant lesions are >5 cm.[7] Smaller tumors should be classified as at lower risk for malignancy rather than as benign. Tumor necrosis, cystic change, nuclear atypia, tumor vascularity, and degree of staining for CD117 are unreliable predictors of malignancy.[8] Metastases are most common in the liver, mesentery, and peritoneum [Figure 15].[910] Calcification is usually seen in metastases after specific chemotherapy.
Figure 9
Pyloric gastrointestinal stromal tumors in a 47-year-old male — axial contrast-enhanced computed tomography image showing relatively homogenously enhancing mass (arrow) in pylorus of stomach with necrotic center having submucosal as well as intramural component
Figure 10
Rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors in 68-year-old male — axial contrast-enhanced computed tomography image showing exophytic heterogeneously enhancing mass lesion arising from rectal wall (arrow) with areas of necrosis
Figure 11
Cystic gastrointestinal stromal tumors in a 51-yearold male — (a) barium meal follow through spot image showing displacement of terminal ileal loops (arrow) with extrinsic impression and obtuse angles (b) coronal contrast-enhanced computed tomography image showing cystic mass (arrow) arising from the ileal loop (arrowhead)
Figure 12
Malignant small bowel gastrointestinal stromal tumors with lymphadenopathy — axial contrast-enhanced computed tomography image showing large cavitating exophytic mass lesion arising from small bowel (white arrowhead) with right iliac lymph node (black arrowhead)
Figure 13
Small bowel gastrointestinal stromal tumors in a 70-yearold female — axial contrast-enhanced computed tomography image showing exophytic mass arising from jejunal loop with necrosis and air within the tumor (arrow) — “Toricelli-Bernouilli” sign
Figure 14
Peritoneal gastrointestinal stromal tumors with mild ascites in 52-year-old male — coronal contrast-enhanced computed tomography image showing heterogenously enhancing peritoneal mass (arrowhead) with minimal ascites (arrow)
Figure 15
Malignant small bowel gastrointestinal stromal tumors in 45-year-old male — (a) contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) showing multiple liver metastases (arrows) (b) axial CECT image showing heterogenous mass lesion with exophytic component (arrowhead) arising from jejunal loop (c) CECT bone window showing bony metastases (arrows)
Pyloric gastrointestinal stromal tumors in a 47-year-old male — axial contrast-enhanced computed tomography image showing relatively homogenously enhancing mass (arrow) in pylorus of stomach with necrotic center having submucosal as well as intramural componentRectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors in 68-year-old male — axial contrast-enhanced computed tomography image showing exophytic heterogeneously enhancing mass lesion arising from rectal wall (arrow) with areas of necrosisCystic gastrointestinal stromal tumors in a 51-yearold male — (a) barium meal follow through spot image showing displacement of terminal ileal loops (arrow) with extrinsic impression and obtuse angles (b) coronal contrast-enhanced computed tomography image showing cystic mass (arrow) arising from the ileal loop (arrowhead)Malignant small bowel gastrointestinal stromal tumors with lymphadenopathy — axial contrast-enhanced computed tomography image showing large cavitating exophytic mass lesion arising from small bowel (white arrowhead) with right iliac lymph node (black arrowhead)Small bowel gastrointestinal stromal tumors in a 70-yearold female — axial contrast-enhanced computed tomography image showing exophytic mass arising from jejunal loop with necrosis and air within the tumor (arrow) — “Toricelli-Bernouilli” signPeritoneal gastrointestinal stromal tumors with mild ascites in 52-year-old male — coronal contrast-enhanced computed tomography image showing heterogenously enhancing peritoneal mass (arrowhead) with minimal ascites (arrow)Malignant small bowel gastrointestinal stromal tumors in 45-year-old male — (a) contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) showing multiple liver metastases (arrows) (b) axial CECT image showing heterogenous mass lesion with exophytic component (arrowhead) arising from jejunal loop (c) CECT bone window showing bony metastases (arrows)Complete surgical excision is the treatment of choice. Unlike carcinomas, resection of GISTs does not require wide bowel excision or lymphadenectomy as these tumors usually do not show lymph node metastases.[8] However, despite apparently complete resection with clear margins, the recurrence rate is high. Chemotherapy with imatinib mesylate, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor has been found to be highly effective in treatment of metastatic GIST. Imatinib mesylate has revolutionized the management of GIST. Now it is often used as the first-line treatment for unresectable, metastatic, or recurrent GIST. Although complete responses are rare, a large majority of patients with metastatic or inoperable GIST have either a partial response or disease stabilization after starting imatinib. Median survival rates have gone from <2 years to >5 years since the advent of imatinib therapy.[11] Role of imaging also lies in response evaluation of patients treated with imatinib. Response to imatinib is characterized by decreased enhancement, resolution of the enhancing tumor nodules and a decrease in tumor neovascularity [Figures 16-20]. These changes are usually seen within 1-month of initiation of chemotherapy. Initially, tumors may enlarge during treatment due to intratumoral hemorrhage and myxoid degeneration. Enlargement with an overall decrease in tumor enhancement suggests a favorable response. Presence of new enhancing nodules within the tumor is consistent with recurrence.[12]
Figure 16
Malignant metastatic stomach gastrointestinal stromal tumors posttreatment — (a) Axial noncontrast computed tomography scan showing heterogeneous mass arising from stomach and abutting the liver (b) posttreatment the mass shows heterogeneous enhancement with significant decrease in size
Figure 20
Stomach gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) postsurgery — (a) axial contrast-enhanced computed tomography showing heterogenously enhancing (arrow) stomach GIST (b) postsurgery, there is significant decrease in size with residual tumor showing minimal enhancement (arrow)
Malignant metastatic stomach gastrointestinal stromal tumors posttreatment — (a) Axial noncontrast computed tomography scan showing heterogeneous mass arising from stomach and abutting the liver (b) posttreatment the mass shows heterogeneous enhancement with significant decrease in sizeMetastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors posttreatment — (a) axial noncontrast computed tomography scan showing multiple metastasis in liver (b) Posttreatment calcification is seen within the metastatic lesions with reduction in sizeSubmucosal stomach gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) postsurgery — (a) axial contrast-enhanced computed tomography showing homogenously enhancing (arrow) stomach GIST (b) postsurgery, there is complete resection of the tumor with no evidence of recurrence (arrow)Submucosal stomach gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) postsurgery — (a) axial contrast-enhanced computed tomography showing homogenously enhancing stomach GIST (b) Postsurgery, there is complete resection of the tumor with no evidence of recurrenceStomach gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) postsurgery — (a) axial contrast-enhanced computed tomography showing heterogenously enhancing (arrow) stomach GIST (b) postsurgery, there is significant decrease in size with residual tumor showing minimal enhancement (arrow)Choi et al. have demonstrated that a decrease in tumor size of >10% or a decrease in tumor density of >15% had a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 100% in detecting patients with good response to treatment with imatinib evaluated by positron emission tomography (PET)-CT in metastatic GIST.[13] A short-term follow-up by CT scan can be done at 1-month if PET is not available. GISTs are associated with Carney's triad, adrenocortical adenoma, ulcerative colitis, esophageal leiomyoma, and neurofibromatosis.[10]
CONCLUSION
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors are a unique and special group of mesenchymal tumors that predominantly exhibit an altered oncogene — kit (CD117). With the availability of specific molecular therapy, radiologists can often timely predict the correct diagnosis of a large exophytic bowel mass, which may show necrosis or hemorrhage. Radiologic appearances can change drastically after therapy and knowledge of such imaging features is beneficial to oncologists in managing these patients.
Authors: Kumaresan Sandrasegaran; Arumugam Rajesh; Jonas Rydberg; Daniel A Rushing; Fatih M Akisik; John D Henley Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Angela D Levy; Helen E Remotti; William M Thompson; Leslie H Sobin; Markku Miettinen Journal: Radiographics Date: 2003 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 5.333
Authors: Charles D Blanke; George D Demetri; Margaret von Mehren; Michael C Heinrich; Burton Eisenberg; Jonathan A Fletcher; Christopher L Corless; Christopher D M Fletcher; Peter J Roberts; Daniela Heinz; Elisabeth Wehre; Zariana Nikolova; Heikki Joensuu Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-02-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Xie Hong; Haesun Choi; Evelyne M Loyer; Robert S Benjamin; Jonathan C Trent; Chusilp Charnsangavej Journal: Radiographics Date: 2006 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 5.333