Literature DB >> 25197142

Syringe label: A potential source of dosage error.

Savitri Velayudhan1, Vasudevan Arumugam1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 25197142      PMCID: PMC4155319          DOI: 10.4103/0019-5049.139036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Anaesth        ISSN: 0019-5049


× No keyword cloud information.
Sir, As anaesthesiologists we use a number of drugs every day. Drug labelling is a daily routine for us and errors in drug labelling could prove fatal. The Institute of Medicine report states that almost 44,000-98,000 patients die due to medical errors of which most are medication related.[1] A review of 896 case reports from the Australian Incident Monitoring Database collected between the year 1988 and December 2001 showed that 452 (50.4%) incidents are due to syringe and drug preparation errors.[2] Drug administration from pre-loaded syringes are supposed to increase safety. There are standards determined for drug labelling during anaesthetic practice by ISO 26825.[3] Pre-printed labels designed according to the guidelines can ensure better safety. Pre-filled syringes and bar code labels have found to reduce the incidence of errors by 41% and 58%, respectively.[4] However, the standards are not usually followed and hand written labels are a common occurrence. Drug labelling varies with different institutes. Drugs are loaded in syringes according to the dosing requirements. These dosages can vary from micrograms per cc to milligrams per cc They are not always mentioned clearly. Some labels have percentages, some have ratios and some others are written in milligram/microgram per cc [Figure 1]. Of these methods, milligram/microgram per cc is the most clear. Labelling in ratios may lead to confusion because it is not clear if it indicates the times of dilution or concentration present in 1 cc. Labelling in percentages on the other hand requires some amount of calculation for residents who are not used to it.
Figure 1

(a) Percentage, (b) Ratio, (c) Milligram per cubiccentimetre

(a) Percentage, (b) Ratio, (c) Milligram per cubiccentimetre Every institute has its own practice and the residents there are familiar with it. Confusion arises when a resident from one institute joins another institute where the labelling practices are different. This may lead to delay in drug administration in an emergency situation or administration of a wrong dosage and could prove dangerous. Drugs with narrow therapeutic index should be labelled in appropriate form, for even minor dosage errors in administering these drugs can be disastrous. Drug errors could result in patient death, increased hospital length of stay, health costs and increased morbidity. As previously mentioned, it is of utmost importance that errors due to wrong administration should be prevented. To achieve the same, it is prudent to follow a definite protocol for drug labelling. The best method would be to use pre-printed labels, which are designed according to the ISO 26825 guidelines for drug labels during anaesthetic practice. As it is not always possible to obtain the best in a country like ours where cost constraints are high, it is important that at least a clear labelling technique, which would minimise confusion and errors, should be followed uniformly. The reason behind this communication is that, this is an area where a minor modification could prevent a major mishap.
  3 in total

Review 1.  Evidence-based strategies for preventing drug administration errors during anaesthesia.

Authors:  L S Jensen; A F Merry; C S Webster; J Weller; L Larsson
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 6.955

2.  Drug error in anaesthetic practice: a review of 896 reports from the Australian Incident Monitoring Study database.

Authors:  A Abeysekera; I J Bergman; M T Kluger; T G Short
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 6.955

Review 3.  The contribution of labelling to safe medication administration in anaesthetic practice.

Authors:  Alan F Merry; Diana H Shipp; Jocelyn S Lowinger
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2011-06
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.