Literature DB >> 25197001

Immediate postoperative imaging after uncomplicated endoscopic approach to the anterior skull base: is it necessary?

Sahar Nadimi1, Nadieska Caballero, Patrick Carpenter, Lauren Sowa, Ryan Cunningham, Kevin C Welch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Postoperative imaging is frequently performed to assess for intracranial complications following anterior skull base (ASB) surgery. However, there is little data to suggest that radiologic studies change the management of complications. In this study, the utility of postoperative imaging within 72 hours after uncomplicated ASB surgery was examined.
METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of 143 patients who underwent endoscopic ASB surgery between 2007 and 2013 at Loyola University Medical Center. The main outcomes measures included the ability of head computed tomography (CT) scan to identify postoperative complications and hallmark symptoms associated with complications.
RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients underwent postoperative imaging within 72 hours of the initial surgery. The most common finding was pneumocephalus (35/79; 44%). Expanding pneumocephalus requiring surgical intervention developed in 3 cases. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak was the most common complication, occurring in 22 of 143 (15%) of the patients. Of the 24 patients who developed a postoperative complication, all had clinical signs or symptoms indicative of the need for surgical or medical intervention. The positive predictive value for a head CT scan to detect a complication was 12%, negative predictive value was 92%, and sensitivity and specificity were 63% and 48%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Routine postoperative imaging may be unnecessary after uncomplicated endoscopic ASB surgery because (1) it may not alter patient management; (2) it may not detect the most common complication (CSF leak); and (3) when imaging is positive, the patient has clinical symptoms suggesting a need for intervention.
© 2014 ARS-AAOA, LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CSF rhinorrhea; anterior skull base; computed tomography; endoscopic skull-base surgery; imaging; postoperative

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25197001     DOI: 10.1002/alr.21405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol        ISSN: 2042-6976            Impact factor:   3.858


  5 in total

Review 1.  Routine postoperative computed tomography scan after craniotomy: systematic review and evidence-based recommendations.

Authors:  Lukas Blumrich; João Paulo Mota Telles; Saul Almeida da Silva; Ricardo Ferrareto Iglesio; Manoel Jacobsen Teixeira; Eberval Gadelha Figueiredo
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 2.  [Complications of anterior skull base surgery].

Authors:  M Wagenmann; K Scheckenbach; B Kraus; I Stenin
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Straws Don't Suck: Are Straws Dangerous after Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery?

Authors:  Erin K Reilly; Judd H Fastenberg; Mindy R Rabinowitz; Colin T Huntley; Maurits S Boon; Gregory A Epps; Swar Vimawala; Chandala Chitguppi; Jena Patel; Gurston G Nyquist; Marc R Rosen; James J Evans
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2020-08-05

Review 4.  Characterizing and quantifying low-value diagnostic imaging internationally: a scoping review.

Authors:  Elin Kjelle; Eivind Richter Andersen; Arne Magnus Krokeide; Lesley J J Soril; Leti van Bodegom-Vos; Fiona M Clement; Bjørn Morten Hofmann
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 2.795

Review 5.  The expanded endonasal approach in pediatric skull base surgery: A review.

Authors:  Nyall R London; Gustavo G Rangel; Patrick C Walz
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-03-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.