Hiromitsu Kumada1, Ken Sato2, Tetsuo Takehara3, Makoto Nakamuta4, Masatoshi Ishigami5, Kazuaki Chayama6, Joji Toyota7, Fumitaka Suzuki1, Yoshiyuki Nakayasu8, Miyoko Ochi8, Ichimaro Yamada8, Takeshi Okanoue9. 1. Department of Hepatology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. 2. Department of Medicine and Molecular Science, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan. 3. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan. 4. Department of Gastroenterology, Kyushu Medical Center, National Hospital Organization, Fukuoka, Japan. 5. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan. 6. Department of Medical and Molecular Science, Division of Frontier Medical Science, Programs for Biomedical Research, Graduate School of Biomedical Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan. 7. Department of Gastroenterology, Sapporo Kosei General Hospital, Hokkaido, Japan. 8. Development Division, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Tokyo, Japan. 9. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Saiseikai Suita Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Abstract
AIM: This study assessed the efficacy and safety of telaprevir in combination with peginterferon-α-2b (PEG IFN) and ribavirin (RBV), for Japanese difficult-to-treat patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 2 who had not achieved sustained virological response (SVR) during prior treatment. METHODS: In total, 108 relapsed (median age, 59.0 years) and 10 non-responding (median age, 59.0 years) patients with genotype 2 HCV participated. Patients received telaprevir (750 mg, every 8 h) for 12 weeks and PEG IFN/RBV for 24 weeks. RESULTS: The SVR rates for relapsers and non-responders were 88.0% (95/108) and 50.0% (5/10), respectively. The SVR rates did not differ significantly between patients with rs8099917 TT and non-TT. The SVR rates for relapsers and non-responders with extended rapid viral response (eRVR) were 97.6% (82/84) and 100% (5/5), respectively. On the other hand, the SVR rates for relapsers and non-responders completing the treatment protocol were 98.4% (61/62) and 100% (5/5), respectively. The overall safety profiles of telaprevir-based regimens were similar for Japanese patients with genotype 1 and 2 HCV infection who experienced treatment failure. CONCLUSION: Telaprevir, in combination with PEG IFN/RBV, provided a high SVR rate for genotype 2 HCV, difficult-to-treat patients who had not achieved SVR during prior IFN-based treatment. The eRVR had a strong influence on the cure rate of telaprevir-based therapy. In addition, the continuation of telaprevir-based treatment for up to 24 weeks was a significant predictor of SVR.
AIM: This study assessed the efficacy and safety of telaprevir in combination with peginterferon-α-2b (PEG IFN) and ribavirin (RBV), for Japanese difficult-to-treat patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 2 who had not achieved sustained virological response (SVR) during prior treatment. METHODS: In total, 108 relapsed (median age, 59.0 years) and 10 non-responding (median age, 59.0 years) patients with genotype 2 HCV participated. Patients received telaprevir (750 mg, every 8 h) for 12 weeks and PEG IFN/RBV for 24 weeks. RESULTS: The SVR rates for relapsers and non-responders were 88.0% (95/108) and 50.0% (5/10), respectively. The SVR rates did not differ significantly between patients with rs8099917 TT and non-TT. The SVR rates for relapsers and non-responders with extended rapid viral response (eRVR) were 97.6% (82/84) and 100% (5/5), respectively. On the other hand, the SVR rates for relapsers and non-responders completing the treatment protocol were 98.4% (61/62) and 100% (5/5), respectively. The overall safety profiles of telaprevir-based regimens were similar for Japanese patients with genotype 1 and 2 HCV infection who experienced treatment failure. CONCLUSION:Telaprevir, in combination with PEG IFN/RBV, provided a high SVR rate for genotype 2 HCV, difficult-to-treat patients who had not achieved SVR during prior IFN-based treatment. The eRVR had a strong influence on the cure rate of telaprevir-based therapy. In addition, the continuation of telaprevir-based treatment for up to 24 weeks was a significant predictor of SVR.