OBJECTIVE: Recombinant human erythropoietin (rhuEpo) is used clinically to treat anaemia. However, rhuEpo-treated cancer patients show decreased survival rates and erythropoietin receptor (EpoR) expression has been found in patient tumour tissue. Thus, rhuEpo application might promote EpoR(+) tumour progression. We therefore developed the positron emission tomography (PET)-probe (68)Ga-DOTA-rhuEpo and evaluated its performance in EpoR(+) A549 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) xenografts. METHODS: (68)Ga-DOTA-rhuEpo was generated by coupling DOTA-hydrazide to carbohydrate side-chains of rhuEpo. Biodistribution was determined in tumour-bearing mice 0.5, 3, 6, and 9 h after probe injection. Competition experiments were performed by co-injecting (68)Ga-DOTA-rhuEpo and rhuEpo in five-fold excess. Probe specificity was further evaluated histologically using Epo-Cy5.5 stainings. RESULTS: The blood half-life of (68)Ga-DOTA-rhuEpo was 2.6 h and the unbound fraction was cleared by the liver and kidney. After 6 h, the highest tumour to muscle ratio was reached. The highest (68)Ga-DOTA-rhuEpo accumulation was found in liver (10.06 ± 6.26%ID/ml), followed by bone marrow (1.87 ± 0.53%ID/ml), kidney (1.58 ± 0.39%ID/ml), and tumour (0.99 ± 0.16%ID/ml). EpoR presence in these organs was histologically confirmed. Competition experiments showed significantly (p < 0.05) lower PET-signals in tumour and bone marrow at 3 and 6 h. CONCLUSION: (68)Ga-DOTA-rhuEpo shows favourable pharmacokinetic properties and detects EpoR specifically. Therefore, it might become a valuable radiotracer to monitor EpoR status in tumours and support decision-making in anaemia therapy. KEY POINTS: • PET-probe (68) Ga-DOTA-rhuEpo was administered to assess the EpoR status in vivo • (68) Ga-DOTA-rhuEpo binds specifically to EpoR positive organs in vivo • Tumour EpoR status determination might enable decision-making in anaemia therapy with rhuEpo.
OBJECTIVE: Recombinant humanerythropoietin (rhuEpo) is used clinically to treat anaemia. However, rhuEpo-treated cancerpatients show decreased survival rates and erythropoietin receptor (EpoR) expression has been found in patienttumour tissue. Thus, rhuEpo application might promote EpoR(+) tumour progression. We therefore developed the positron emission tomography (PET)-probe (68)Ga-DOTA-rhuEpo and evaluated its performance in EpoR(+) A549 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) xenografts. METHODS: (68)Ga-DOTA-rhuEpo was generated by coupling DOTA-hydrazide to carbohydrate side-chains of rhuEpo. Biodistribution was determined in tumour-bearing mice 0.5, 3, 6, and 9 h after probe injection. Competition experiments were performed by co-injecting (68)Ga-DOTA-rhuEpo and rhuEpo in five-fold excess. Probe specificity was further evaluated histologically using Epo-Cy5.5 stainings. RESULTS: The blood half-life of (68)Ga-DOTA-rhuEpo was 2.6 h and the unbound fraction was cleared by the liver and kidney. After 6 h, the highest tumour to muscle ratio was reached. The highest (68)Ga-DOTA-rhuEpo accumulation was found in liver (10.06 ± 6.26%ID/ml), followed by bone marrow (1.87 ± 0.53%ID/ml), kidney (1.58 ± 0.39%ID/ml), and tumour (0.99 ± 0.16%ID/ml). EpoR presence in these organs was histologically confirmed. Competition experiments showed significantly (p < 0.05) lower PET-signals in tumour and bone marrow at 3 and 6 h. CONCLUSION: (68)Ga-DOTA-rhuEpo shows favourable pharmacokinetic properties and detects EpoR specifically. Therefore, it might become a valuable radiotracer to monitor EpoR status in tumours and support decision-making in anaemia therapy. KEY POINTS: • PET-probe (68) Ga-DOTA-rhuEpo was administered to assess the EpoR status in vivo • (68) Ga-DOTA-rhuEpo binds specifically to EpoR positive organs in vivo • TumourEpoR status determination might enable decision-making in anaemia therapy with rhuEpo.
Authors: Elena Ranyuk; Réjean Lebel; Yves Bérubé-Lauzière; Klaus Klarskov; Roger Lecomte; Johan E van Lier; Brigitte Guérin Journal: Bioconjug Chem Date: 2013-08-26 Impact factor: 4.774
Authors: Peter A Knetsch; Milos Petrik; Christoph M Griessinger; Christine Rangger; Melpomeni Fani; Christian Kesenheimer; Elisabeth von Guggenberg; Bernd J Pichler; Irene Virgolini; Clemens Decristoforo; Roland Haubner Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2011-04-13 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: James R Wright; Yee C Ung; Jim A Julian; Kathleen I Pritchard; Timothy J Whelan; Column Smith; Barbara Szechtman; Wilson Roa; Liam Mulroy; Leona Rudinskas; Bruno Gagnon; Gord S Okawara; Mark N Levine Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-02-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Balaji Agoram; Ken Aoki; Sameer Doshi; Colin Gegg; Graham Jang; Graham Molineux; Linda Narhi; Steve Elliott Journal: J Pharm Sci Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 3.534
Authors: Yin Zhang; Hao Hong; Jonathan W Engle; Jero Bean; Yunan Yang; Bryan R Leigh; Todd E Barnhart; Weibo Cai Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-12-09 Impact factor: 3.240