Literature DB >> 25196091

Attitudes towards implementation of surveillance-based parasite control on Kentucky Thoroughbred farms - Current strategies, awareness and willingness-to-pay.

M Robert1, W Hu1,2, M K Nielsen3, C J Stowe1.   

Abstract

REASONS FOR PERFORMING STUDY: Traditionally, equine parasite control has relied heavily on frequent routine anthelmintic treatments applied at regular intervals all year round. However, current recommendations aim to employ a more surveillance-based approach and it remains unknown to what extent these recommendations are being implemented on US horse farms.
OBJECTIVES: To describe equine parasite control on Kentucky Thoroughbred farms and evaluate respondents' willingness to pay for various attributes of surveillance-based parasite control strategies. STUDY
DESIGN: Questionnaire survey performed among the membership of the Kentucky Thoroughbred Farm Managers' Club.
METHODS: The survey collected demographic data and information about current parasite control strategies. Further, respondents were asked to choose between hypothetical parasite control strategies described with a combination of different attributes: costs, time and effort needed, hypothetical disease-risk levels and hypothetical risks of anthelmintic resistance. Data were analysed with multivariable logistic analysis.
RESULTS: About 26% responded to the survey (n = 112). Most respondents were concerned about anthelmintic resistance and incorporated veterinary advice in defining their deworming programme. However, almost 70% were following a traditional rotational deworming programme with little or no faecal surveillance. Respondents were willing to pay a premium for a product for which there is no known anthelmintic resistance and provided the highest possible decrease in health risks. The number of young horses on the farm, utilisation of veterinarian advice in developing a deworming programme, expressed concern about drug resistance in parasites and having documented drug resistance on the farm all associated significantly with the type of parasite control programme used.
CONCLUSIONS: Traditional approaches for equine parasite control are still widely used in the Kentucky Thoroughbred industry. The data suggest that respondents were only willing to make these changes if they could be given assurance that the surveillance-based approach would prevent anthelmintic resistance and decrease health risks significantly for the horses.
© 2014 EVJ Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Kentucky Thoroughbred farms; conjoint analysis; horse; parasite control; willingness-to-pay

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25196091     DOI: 10.1111/evj.12344

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Equine Vet J        ISSN: 0425-1644            Impact factor:   2.888


  8 in total

1.  The importance of anthelmintic efficacy monitoring: results of an outreach effort.

Authors:  Jennifer L Cain; Donna Foulk; Edward Jedrzejewski; Heather Stofanak; Martin K Nielsen
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2019-08-17       Impact factor: 2.289

Review 2.  Anthelmintic resistance in equine nematodes.

Authors:  Jacqueline B Matthews
Journal:  Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist       Date:  2014-10-25       Impact factor: 4.077

3.  Text Mining Analysis to Evaluate Stakeholders' Perception Regarding Welfare of Equines, Small Ruminants, and Turkeys.

Authors:  Emanuela Dalla Costa; Vito Tranquillo; Francesca Dai; Michela Minero; Monica Battini; Silvana Mattiello; Sara Barbieri; Valentina Ferrante; Lorenzo Ferrari; Adroaldo Zanella; Elisabetta Canali
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Parasite Occurrence and Parasite Management in Swedish Horses Presenting with Gastrointestinal Disease-A Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Ylva Hedberg-Alm; Johanna Penell; Miia Riihimäki; Eva Osterman-Lind; Martin K Nielsen; Eva Tydén
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Parascaris spp. eggs in horses of Italy: a large-scale epidemiological analysis of the egg excretion and conditioning factors.

Authors:  Antonio Scala; Claudia Tamponi; Giuliana Sanna; Giulio Predieri; Luisa Meloni; Stephane Knoll; Giampietro Sedda; Giorgia Dessì; Maria Grazia Cappai; Antonio Varcasia
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 3.876

Review 6.  The equine ascarids: resuscitating historic model organisms for modern purposes.

Authors:  Jennifer L Cain; Martin K Nielsen
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2022-08-20       Impact factor: 2.383

7.  Managing anthelmintic resistance in cyathostomin parasites: Investigating the benefits of refugia-based strategies.

Authors:  Dave M Leathwick; Christian W Sauermann; Martin K Nielsen
Journal:  Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 4.077

8.  Dealing with double trouble: Combination deworming against double-drug resistant cyathostomins.

Authors:  J A Scare; D M Leathwick; C W Sauermann; E T Lyons; A E Steuer; B A Jones; M Clark; M K Nielsen
Journal:  Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 4.077

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.