Literature DB >> 25195923

Increasing participation in colorectal cancer screening: results from a cluster randomized trial of directly mailed gFOBT kits to previous nonresponders.

Jill Tinmouth1, Jigisha Patel, Peter C Austin, Nancy N Baxter, Melissa C Brouwers, Craig Earle, Cheryl Levitt, Yan Lu, Marnie Mackinnon, Lawrence Paszat, Linda Rabeneck.   

Abstract

Regular screening using guaiac fecal occult blood test (gFOBT) reduces mortality from colorectal cancer (CRC). The objective of this study was to determine whether the addition of a gFOBT kit to a second mailed invitation compared to a second mailed invitation alone increases CRC screening among eligible persons who did not respond to an initial mailed invitation. We conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial, with the physician as the unit of randomization. Participants were persons who had been invited but who had not responded to an invitation for CRC screening in an earlier pilot project. The intervention group received a mailed gFOBT kit and second mailed CRC screening invitation (n = 2,008) while the control group received a second mailed CRC screening invitation alone (n = 1,586). The primary outcome was the uptake of gFOBT within 6 months of the second mailing. We found that the uptake of gFOBT was more than twice as high in the intervention group (20.1%) compared to the control group (9.6%). The absolute difference between the two groups was 10.5% (95% CI: 7.5-13.4%, p ≤ 0.0001). In a subsequent adjusted analysis, participants in the intervention group were twice as likely to complete the test as those in the control group (OR = 2.1; 95% CI: 1.6-2.6). These findings suggest that directly mailed gFOBT kits increase CRC screening participation among previous nonresponders to a mailed invitation and that approximately 10 gFOBT kits would have to be sent by mail in order to screen 1 additional person. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01629004).
© 2014 UICC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  colorectal cancer; fecal occult blood test; randomized controlled trial; screening

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25195923     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.29191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  11 in total

1.  Directly Mailing gFOBT Kits to Previous Responders Being Recalled for Colorectal Cancer Screening Increases Participation.

Authors:  Jill Tinmouth; Jigisha Patel; Peter C Austin; Nancy N Baxter; Melissa C Brouwers; Craig C Earle; Cheryl Levitt; Yan Lu; Marnie MacKinnon; Lawrence Paszat; Linda Rabeneck
Journal:  J Can Assoc Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-10-18

2.  Effectiveness of reminder strategies on cancer screening adherence: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Martin Cs Wong; Jessica Yl Ching; Junjie Huang; John Ct Wong; Thomas Yt Lam; Victor Cw Chan; Simpson Kc Ng; Zero Hui; Arthur Kc Luk; Justin Cy Wu; Francis Kl Chan
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Factors of Never Screened with Faecal Occult Blood Test in Public Primary Care Facilities.

Authors:  Mohd Fazeli Sazali; Syed Sharizman Syed Abdul Rahim; Richard Avoi; Mohd Rohaizat Hassan; Firdaus Hayati; Zahir Izuan Azhar; Mohammad Saffree Jeffree; Khamisah Awang Lukman; Naing Oo Tha; Helmy Sajali; Azman Atil; Muhammad Aklil Abd Rahim
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2021-01-01

4.  Text Messaging and Opt-out Mailed Outreach in Colorectal Cancer Screening: a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Sarah W Huf; David A Asch; Kevin G Volpp; Catherine Reitz; Shivan J Mehta
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 6.473

5.  Observational study to evaluate the impact of internet reminders for GPs on colorectal cancer screening uptake in Northern Italy in 2013.

Authors:  E Gabrielli; A J Bastiampillai; M Pontello; G Beghi; P Ceresa; M E Pirola; D Cereda
Journal:  J Prev Med Hyg       Date:  2016-12

6.  Adherence to colorectal cancer screening: four rounds of faecal immunochemical test-based screening.

Authors:  Manon van der Vlugt; Esmée J Grobbee; Patrick Mm Bossuyt; Evelien Bongers; Wolfert Spijker; Ernst J Kuipers; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Marie-Louise Essink-Bot; Manon C W Spaander; Evelien Dekker
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Improving proteinuria screening with mailed smartphone urinalysis testing in previously unscreened patients with hypertension: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Julia Leddy; Jamie A Green; Christina Yule; Juliann Molecavage; Josef Coresh; Alex R Chang
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 2.388

8.  Decreased Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Incidence-Based Mortality in the Screening-Age Population of Ontario.

Authors:  Lawrence F Paszat; Rinku Sutradhar; Elyse Corn; Jill Tinmouth; Nancy N Baxter; Linda Rabeneck
Journal:  J Can Assoc Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-10-15

9.  Rapid review of evaluation of interventions to improve participation in cancer screening services.

Authors:  Stephen W Duffy; Jonathan P Myles; Roberta Maroni; Abeera Mohammad
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 2.136

10.  Colorectal cancer and potential predictors of never screened for faecal occult blood test: a narrative review.

Authors:  Mohd Fazeli Sazali; Syed Sharizman Syed Abdul Rahim; Firdaus Hayati; Mohd Nazri Mohd Daud; Richard Avoi; Azizan Omar; Azman Atil; Muhammad Aklil Abd Rahim; Mohd Faizal Madrim; Khalid Mokti; Abdul Rahman Ramdzan; Zulkhairul Naim Sidek Ahmad; Andee Dzulkarnaen Zakaria; Mohd Firdaus Che Ani; Aini Fahriza Ibrahim; Zahir Izuan Azhar; Mohammad Saffree Jeffree; Mohd Rohaizat Hassan
Journal:  J Public Health Res       Date:  2021-08-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.