Literature DB >> 25195816

Single Restorations in the Resorbed Posterior Mandible Supported by 6-mm Implants: A 1-Year Prospective Case Series Study.

Felix L Guljé1,2, Gerry M Raghoebar1, Arjan Vissink1, Henny J A Meijer1,3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this prospective case series study was to assess the clinical performance of single restorations in the posterior mandible supported by 6-mm implants.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-one consecutive patients with one or more missing premolars or molars in the posterior mandible and with an estimated bone height of 8 mm between the top of the ridge and alveolar nerve were included. Each patient was to receive one or more 6-mm implants (OsseoSpeed 4.0 S, Astra Tech Implant System, Dentsply Implants, Mölndal, Sweden) without any grafting. After a 3-month osseointegration period, the implants were restored with custom-made titanium abutments (Atlantis abutment, Dentsply Implants) and cemented zirconia-based porcelain crowns. Clinical and radiographic examinations were performed at placement of the restoration and 12 months thereafter. Next to this, patients' satisfaction was scored before treatment and after 12 months with the restoration in function.
RESULTS: Implant survival was 100%. From loading to the 12-month follow-up, mean marginal bone loss was 0.14 mm (SD: 0.4). Mean scores for plaque, calculus, gingiva, bleeding, and pocket probing depth were low. Patients' satisfaction was high.
CONCLUSION: One-year follow-up data revealed that 6-mm dental implants inserted in the resorbed posterior mandible provide a solid basis for single tooth restoration.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  posterior mandible; prospective study; short dental implants; single restorations

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25195816     DOI: 10.1111/cid.12272

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res        ISSN: 1523-0899            Impact factor:   3.932


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of implant versus tooth-supported zirconia-based single crowns in a split-mouth design: a 4-year clinical follow-up study.

Authors:  Mustafa Barış Güncü; Umut Cakan; Guliz Aktas; Güliz Nigar Güncü; Şenay Canay
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  Influence of implant location on the clinical outcomes of implant abutments: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Amr G ElHoussiney; He Zhang; Jinlin Song; Ping Ji; Lu Wang; Sheng Yang
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2018-02-26

3.  Single crown restorations supported by 6-mm implants in the resorbed posterior mandible: A five-year prospective case series.

Authors:  Felix L Guljé; Gerry M Raghoebar; Arjan Vissink; Henny J A Meijer
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2019-07-28       Impact factor: 3.932

4.  Monolithic zirconia single tooth implant-supported restorations with CAD/CAM titanium abutments in the posterior region: A 1-year prospective case series study.

Authors:  Vincent J J Donker; Gerry M Raghoebar; Charlotte Jensen-Louwerse; Arjan Vissink; Henny J A Meijer
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 4.259

5.  Full-zirconia single-tooth molar implant-supported restorations with angulated screw channel abutments: A 1-year prospective case series study.

Authors:  Christiaan W P Pol; Gerry M Raghoebar; Zakelina Maragkou; Marco S Cune; Henny J A Meijer
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 3.932

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.