Literature DB >> 25195443

Effect of trap design, bait type, and age on captures of Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in berry crops.

Lindsy E Iglesias, Teresia W Nyoike, Oscar E Liburd.   

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted in commercial southern highbush blueberries and wild blackberries to evaluate the attractiveness of different trap designs, bait types, and bait age on captures of the spotted wing drosophila, Drosophila suzukii (Matsumura) (Diptera: Drosophilidae). During the 2012 trap design study, the five treatments evaluated were four 1-liter clear plastic cup traps (with and without a yellow visual stimulus or odorless dish detergent) and the fifth treatment was a Pherocon AM yellow sticky card trap. Cup traps were baited with 150 ml of apple cider vinegar (ACV) and the Pherocon AM trap had a 7.4-ml glass vial containing ACV. In 2013, the Pherocon AM yellow sticky card was omitted because of low spotted wing drosophila captures in 2012. The four treatments evaluated were four 1-liter cup traps with and without a yellow visual stimulus. One cup trap (with a yellow stimulus) was baited with yeast + sugar in place of ACV and the other cup traps were baited with ACV. In both years, there were no differences in spotted wing drosophila captures among cup traps baited with ACV with and without yellow visual stimulus. However, the cup trap baited with yeast + sugar and yellow visual stimulus captured more spotted wing drosophila than the ACV-baited cup traps irrespective of visual stimulus or detergent. In another study, four baits including 1) ACV, 2) yeast + sugar mixture, 3) yeast + flour mixture (yeast, sugar, water, whole wheat flour, and ACV), and 4) wine + vinegar mixture (rice vinegar and merlot wine) were evaluated in a commercial blueberry planting using 1-liter clear plastic cup traps (as described above). The experiment was repeated in wild blackberries but the yeast + flour bait was replaced with ACV + merlot wine + sugar. Results indicated that the two yeast baits captured significantly more spotted wing drosophila and more nontarget organisms than the vinegar baits. In the final study, although we found that the attraction of ACV and yeast + sugar to spotted wing drosophila did not change with bait age, the attraction to other Drosophilidae flies decreased with age. The ease of implementing a trap-and-lure system for spotted wing drosophila is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25195443     DOI: 10.1603/ec13538

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Econ Entomol        ISSN: 0022-0493            Impact factor:   2.381


  12 in total

Review 1.  Advances in the Chemical Ecology of the Spotted Wing Drosophila (Drosophila suzukii) and its Applications.

Authors:  Kevin R Cloonan; John Abraham; Sergio Angeli; Zainulabeuddin Syed; Cesar Rodriguez-Saona
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Improved capture of Drosophila suzukii by a trap baited with two attractants in the same device.

Authors:  Rodrigo Lasa; Eduardo Tadeo; Ricardo A Toledo-Hérnandez; Lino Carmona; Itzel Lima; Trevor Williams
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Economic Impact of the Introduction and Establishment of Drosophila suzukii on Sweet Cherry Production in Switzerland.

Authors:  Dominique Mazzi; Esther Bravin; Manuela Meraner; Robert Finger; Stefan Kuske
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 2.769

4.  Nutritional geometry and fitness consequences in Drosophila suzukii, the Spotted-Wing Drosophila.

Authors:  Yvonne Young; Natasha Buckiewicz; Tristan A F Long
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-02-11       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Survey on Drosophila suzukii Natural Short-Term Dispersal Capacities Using the Mark-Release-Recapture Technique.

Authors:  Sandra Vacas; Jaime Primo; Juan J Manclús; Ángel Montoya; Vicente Navarro-Llopis
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2019-08-24       Impact factor: 2.769

6.  Evaluation of Monitoring Traps and Lures for Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in Berry Plantings in Florida.

Authors:  Dasia S Harmon; Muhammad Haseeb; Lambert H B Kanga; Oscar E Liburd
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 2.769

7.  Detection and monitoring of Drosophila suzukii in raspberry and cherry orchards with volatile organic compounds in the USA and Europe.

Authors:  Nicholas R Larson; Jaime Strickland; Vonnie D Shields; Antonio Biondi; Lucia Zappalà; Carmelo Cavallaro; Stefano Colazza; Lucía-Adriana Escudero-Colomar; Felix Briem; Heidrun Vogt; François Debias; Patricia Gibert; Emmanuel Desouhant; Aijun Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 4.996

8.  Ingestion of genetically modified yeast symbiont reduces fitness of an insect pest via RNA interference.

Authors:  Katherine A Murphy; Christine A Tabuloc; Kevin R Cervantes; Joanna C Chiu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Identification of attractive blend for spotted wing drosophila, Drosophila suzukii, from apple juice.

Authors:  Yan Feng; Robert Bruton; Alexis Park; Aijun Zhang
Journal:  J Pest Sci (2004)       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 5.918

10.  The use of light spectrum blocking films to reduce populations of Drosophila suzukii Matsumura in fruit crops.

Authors:  Michelle T Fountain; Amir Badiee; Sebastian Hemer; Alvaro Delgado; Michael Mangan; Colin Dowding; Frederick Davis; Simon Pearson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.