Literature DB >> 25194996

Does closure of the buccal mucosal graft bed matter? Results from a randomized controlled trial.

Eddy Wong1, Ashani Fernando2, Ammar Alhasso2, Laurence Stewart2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the effects of closure vs nonclosure of buccal mucosal graft harvest site.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized to either primary closure or nonclosure of buccal mucosal harvest site during urethroplasty. Graft widths were standardized to 2 cm. Prospective data were collected via patient visual analog scales (0-10) of 5 domains examining pain, numbness, tightness, drinking, and eating at postoperative day 1 and 3 and then at 3 weeks and 3 months until 1 year.
RESULTS: There were 34 patients who underwent randomization and completed the study. The preoperative demographics between both groups were comparable with no significant differences. The median age is 44 years. There were 16 patients in the closure group and 18 patients in the nonclosure group. The results show an improvement in the domains of pain (P = .08), drinking (P = .06), and eating (P = .03) in favor of the closure group at postoperative day 1 and 3. There are no significant differences in all 5 domains between both groups after 3 weeks postoperatively
CONCLUSION: This study shows that primary closure of buccal mucosal graft bed improves pain as well as oral intake in the immediate postoperative period. There are no long-term differences.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25194996     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.06.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  7 in total

1.  Fasciocutaneous flap reinforcement of ventral onlay buccal mucosa grafts enables neophallus revision urethroplasty.

Authors:  Stelios C Wilson; John T Stranix; Kiranpreet Khurana; Shane D Morrison; Jamie P Levine; Lee C Zhao
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2016-10-17

2.  Primary dorsal buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty for anterior urethral strictures in patients with lichen sclerosus.

Authors:  Miodrag Acimovic; Bogomir Milojevic; Marko Milosavljevic; Marta Skrodzka; Milan Radovanovic; Dragutin Rafailovic; Zoran Dzamic; Jovan Hadzi Djokic; Rados Djinovic
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Healing of Donor-site Buccal Mucosa Urethroplasty.

Authors:  Amjad Alwaal; Catherine R Harris; Anthony Enriquez; Jack W McAninch; Benjamin N Breyer
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2015-07-04       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Outpatient buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty outcomes are comparable to inpatient procedures.

Authors:  Maxim J McKibben; Michael T Davenport; Partho Mukherjee; Nabeel A Shakir; Mary L West; Joceline S Fuchs; Ellen E Ward; Rachel L Bergeson; Jeremy M Scott; Allen F Morey
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-02

5.  Buccal Mucosa Graft Harvest in Children and Young Adults: Case Series and Harvest Technique.

Authors:  Clarice M Brown; Linnea C Fechtner; Philomena M Behar
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-03-14

6.  Impact of Short-Stay Urethroplasty on Health-Related Quality of Life and Patient's Perception of Timing of Discharge.

Authors:  Henry Okafor; Dmitriy Nikolavsky
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2015-10-01

7.  A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Buccal Mucosal Graft Harvest Site Non-Closure versus Closure in Patients Undergoing Urethral Reconstruction.

Authors:  Eu Chang Hwang; Adam de Fazio; Kallie Hamilton; Caitlin Bakker; Joseph J Pariser; Philipp Dahm
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 5.400

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.