Literature DB >> 25194474

Analysis of endpoints used in marketing authorisations versus value assessments of oncology medicines in Germany.

Jörg Ruof1, Dietrich Knoerzer2, Anja-Alexandra Dünne2, Charalabos-Markos Dintsios3, Thomas Staab2, Friedrich Wilhelm Schwartz4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In Germany, a mandatory early benefit assessment (EBA) by the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) is required for reimbursement of new marketing-authorised medicines. Additional benefit is based on patient-relevant endpoints in mortality, morbidity and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). We aimed to compare endpoints and related benefit categories used in marketing authorisation to those considered by G-BA in the field of oncology.
METHODS: We evaluated EBAs in oncology commencing prior to 31 December 2013. Endpoints for the appropriate medicines, derived from European Medicines Agency's (EMA) Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC), manufacturers' value dossiers and G-BA decisions, were grouped into the three benefit categories.
RESULTS: Of 23 oncology medicines evaluated, primary clinical trial endpoints were included in only 12 G-BA value decisions. Mortality endpoints were generally accepted by EMA and G-BA. However, G-BA excluded 80% of (co-)primary morbidity endpoints. Only 5 SPCs reported HRQoL instruments. G-BA accepted applied instruments in 15 medicines, but the manufacturers' analyses only in 5 medicines, of which 2 indicated an additional benefit.
CONCLUSIONS: Mortality endpoints are accepted by EMA and G-BA. EMA accepted well established and clinically relevant morbidity endpoints (e.g. progression-free survival and response rate), which were mostly excluded by G-BA from their value decisions. The applicability of methods used for benefit assessments to HRQoL differs from the mortality and morbidity categories, and requires further clarification.
Copyright © 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  (Early) benefit assessment; Health-related quality of life; Morbidity; Mortality; Oncology; Patient-relevant endpoints

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25194474     DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.08.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  6 in total

1.  Validity of Surrogate Endpoints and Their Impact on Coverage Recommendations: A Retrospective Analysis across International Health Technology Assessment Agencies.

Authors:  Oriana Ciani; Bogdan Grigore; Hedwig Blommestein; Saskia de Groot; Meilin Möllenkamp; Stefan Rabbe; Rita Daubner-Bendes; Rod S Taylor
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 2.583

2.  Benefit assessment in Germany: implications for price discounts.

Authors:  Ulrike Theidel; J-Matthias Graf von der Schulenburg
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2016-08-02

3.  Inconsistent approaches of the G-BA regarding acceptance of primary study endpoints as being relevant to patients - an analysis of three disease areas: oncological, metabolic, and infectious diseases.

Authors:  Thomas Staab; Georg Isbary; Volker E Amelung; Jörg Ruof
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Early Benefit Assessments in Oncology in Germany: How Can a Clinically Relevant Endpoint Not Be Relevant to Patients?

Authors:  Jörg Ruof; Olivier Flückiger; Niko Andre
Journal:  Drugs R D       Date:  2015-09

5.  Comparison of post-authorisation measures from regulatory authorities with additional evidence requirements from the HTA body in Germany - are additional data requirements by the Federal Joint Committee justified?

Authors:  Jörg Ruof; Thomas Staab; Charalabos-Markos Dintsios; Jakob Schröter; Friedrich Wilhelm Schwartz
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2016-09-29

6.  Current models, challenges and best practices for work conducted between European academic cooperative groups and industry.

Authors:  Rolf A Stahel; Denis Lacombe; Fatima Cardoso; Paolo G Casali; Anastassia Negrouk; Richard Marais; Anita Hiltbrunner; Malvika Vyas
Journal:  ESMO Open       Date:  2020-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.